We've been banging our heads against the wall for the last couple days trying to solve the issue with our Zebra scanners and roaming between APs. Support advised us to disable Mandatory DHCP and it worked, the first thing we said after that is that that setting needs an 'i' info bubble!  I found this in the documentation today, and it's exactly what needs to be in that info bubble. "Enabled: Wireless clients associated to an AP (either new associations or clients that roamed from another AP) that have not requested a DHCP address are placed in a blocked state and are not able to send any traffic on LAN and WAN." ... View more

No problem 😉  I believe this feature is about a year old now. ... View more

Just popping in as a datapoint on this topic. Meraki is pushing to get more IoT devices into the market.. having this option even with licensing would make it easier to accomplish this. If an admin needs to monitor a room or space apply one of the IoT licences to the AP, or if a space that needs to be monitored that doesn't have an AP then install a standalone unit. ... View more

I may have found out something about the 1:1 NAT.  Apparently the 1:1 NAT will not even try to work if the destination is not in the ARP table of the Meraki.  And, in my case the destination device didn't seem to fill the ARP table in my short testing window.  After trying another destination device, it started working about 24 hours where it did not initially upon setup.  Very strange it takes so long to update the ARP table. ... View more

Hi guys,   I tried the above but we're still experiencing this. To note it's only for new users trying to join Wi-Fi. The hops are still dropping at 10.128.128.128.   Any more ideas where to check? ... View more

It definitely works on an RMA, I had a 65 replaced by a 68 and the license was converted, but it did take several emails to the Meraki licensing team as support couldn't do it themselves... ... View more

Other is patches and it is considered the latest stable patch.  If you check the firmware updates forum you will see it labelled as such.  We are running it on multiple MX84s and HA pairs of MX84s with the enterprise feature set. ... View more

Now we just need ALL the same features on CS17 .... And I dont know anything about whats going on in the CS software train. ... View more

Oh god I hope someone with product responsibility sees this. Seemingly small clicks of the front , kinda exposed, button == restart.... uh oh ...   ... View more

This needs to be an option at some point. ... View more

Yeah and I think this is what confused me. Also ... its almost impossible to work around from other equipment. I cant wait until someday where Meraki also supports MST (with more then one instance) or another per vlan STP version where you can control things a bit more. ... View more

I experienced issues on N70 a few weeks ago with summary page and switch port client info not loading and basically timing out. Support said there were no issues and to try different browsers and connections all which made no difference.    I have a feeling the new UI updates are causing some issues that they aren't aware of yet.    My issue came right after 4-5 days. ... View more

You can say this one out loud, it's been around for way too long. ... View more

I see from the below image that they are the same ...  Thanks everyone. ... View more

Hi Thomas, Thank you for mentioning the ease of use features which you'd like to see implemented on the Catalyst switch (CS) platform. However, at this time, no further information is available regarding development of SecurePort or Switch Port Profiles on the CS platform.    SecurePort is currently supported on Catalyst wireless CW916x access points and the MS switch and MR access point models found in the SecurePort KB article here.   Switch Port Profiles are currently supported on the the MS120, MS125, MS130, MS130R, MS210, MS225, MS250, MS350, MS355, MS410, MS425 and MS450. * Please feel free to keep a watch on the Switch Port Profiles KB article regarding updates on supported models, as the MS130 and MS130R were recently added to the list.   Though these features are not currently supported on the CS platform, I highly encourage you to submit a request directly to the Meraki development team for future considerations. Your feedback is greatly appreciated and can be submitted via the “Give your feedback” button which is located at the bottom right corner of each dashboard page. Best, Feli ... View more

Hi there,  If we are observing that the APs are not obeying the configured RF profile settings and there are no manual overrides specified then I would encourage you to engage Meraki support and open a case. Based upon the date of the initial post if APs have not lowered their power transmission in about 24-48 hours then there could be a greater issue.    I have observed scenarios where APs will not transmit at a forced maximum power due to regulatory domain restrictions, but I have not come across the opposite where they will not lower their maximum power transmission.  ... View more

I also wonder what the "with all security features enabled" numbers will be 🙂 ... View more

New Unit. ... View more

One request. Could you upload the pcap file here, just so I can have a look at it ? 🙂 ... View more

I see that the documentation for this has been updated (Last updatedApr 13, 2023). Now it does not mention any special , ehhh, "conditions" for different models. Will it now work, across all switches regardless of port density ? - do anyone know ?   ... View more

Definitely! Maybe there are some thoughts on how to avoid those device usages in future. (Compared to other vendors, which do offer a NFR program, but the do this intentionally, as you won't get support there aswell (VMWare, Mikrotik etc.)) ... View more

After upgrade third party vpn stopped working. Appears as up but there are no traffic between peers. ... View more

Just to close the loop with the community I spoke with @Brennan_Martin offline so we could clearly workout what each of us was attempting to say. At this point we are on the same page and I want to thank him for the time he spent with me today. ... View more

Well the though was that when you utilize Guest VLAN, then the client would be put into that VLAN on an access-reject. And I would just like to return some more config to that Guest access.   https://documentation.meraki.com/@api/deki/files/3974/MS_802.1X_auth_flow_chart.png?revision=1&size=bestfit&width=436&height=599 ... View more

Did a support ticket ever get opened on this? ... View more