Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About thomasthomsen
thomasthomsen
Head in the Cloud
Member since Aug 1, 2018
yesterday
Thomas Obbekær Thomsen
Denmark
Computer and network geek :-)
Community Record
339
Posts
180
Kudos
5
Solutions
Badges
2 weeks ago
Well the though was that when you utilize Guest VLAN, then the client would be put into that VLAN on an access-reject. And I would just like to return some more config to that Guest access. https://documentation.meraki.com/@api/deki/files/3974/MS_802.1X_auth_flow_chart.png?revision=1&size=bestfit&width=436&height=599
... View more
2 weeks ago
Behind the subject is the thought: If I return a group policy (filter-id) in the access-reject message from my radius server will the switch honor this, and apply the GP to the client ? The thought is to apply a GP, with additional ACLs, to clients being placed in the guest network for an access-policy. Thanks /Thomas
... View more
2 weeks ago
1 Kudo
100% correct. Meraki has made a big "gab" in their switch portfolio here and now. The MS130 takes the low end (with mGig, but no SecurePort , and thats really too bad 🙂 ) - And the Merakified Cat9300 takes the highend from MS300 and the MS400 series. But where does that leave the MS200 series. No mGig and the , as far as I remember, longest living current switch. Will there be a Merakified Cat9200 with mGig and secureport that can take over ?
... View more
3 weeks ago
Do anyone have some numbers on those : "Significant performance improvements for MX250, MX450, and MX75 appliances." ? Because the numbers for the MX250 and MX450 with all security features enabled, are lower on the current Sizing guide then the one before that.
... View more
3 weeks ago
Sorry for the late reply. No - we kinda abandoned the troubleshooting on this point, because the prime problem was low signal strength for the current posistion of the MG. I do not have one in my lab, so I had no way of doing additional testing.
... View more
11-06-2023
12:06 PM
2 Kudos
Perhaps we will get lucky at Enterprise Networking PVT in Amsterdam next week ? 🙂 (I still remember when everyone got a 3560CX wayyyy back .. fun times at security check-in in Schiphol that last day 🙂 )
... View more
10-25-2023
03:20 PM
Yeah. I might open a case. I just want to be sure everything is connected correctly first (also a damm shame that there is no interface counters on the MX, its on my wishlist 🙂 )
... View more
10-25-2023
12:20 PM
MG 3.100 MX 17.10.9 - MX68
... View more
10-25-2023
12:12 PM
I would completely agree. But Im just wondering why they seem to match up with the : "Primary uplink status change" of the MG also. This seems strange to me. Why would the cellular interface change when the ethernet link goes down on an MG (not PoE powered of course).
... View more
10-25-2023
11:58 AM
This is the MX log for ethernet port carrier change: Oct 25 14:19:06 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:19:02 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 14:17:49 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:17:23 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 14:08:25 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:08:20 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 14:03:37 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:03:34 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 12:02:25 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 12:02:22 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 12:01:03 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 12:00:28 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 11:57:32 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 11:57:30 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:35:24 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:35:21 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:34:08 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:34:03 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:33:59 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:33:42 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:32:21 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:32:18 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 07:34:31 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 07:34:27 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 07:33:16 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 07:32:22 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 07:30:35 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 07:30:32 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false
... View more
10-25-2023
11:54 AM
Im trying to figure out whats going on here in this eventlog (see below). The MG actually have to sims from different providers. Auto failover is enabled. SIM1 (as you can see) is TeliaDK SIM2 is TDC MG is getting power from PSU, not PoE In Denmark we have a very good idea of what ISP is where (mastedatabasen.dk will tell you) When we look at this customers site, they are sitting, "more or less", in the middle of 3 different TeliaDK cells. Only 1 TDC cell is nearby This site looses connection throughout the day, and it matches pretty well with the below log. So I was wondering, does the below log show roaming between these cells ? Because it never fails over to the secondary SIM. But why does the ethernet connection go up and down ? This is very strange behaviour I think. Oct 25 14:22:28 Cellular Cellular connection up local: 100.83.124.240, remote: 100.83.124.241, provider: TeliaDk, connection: AUTO Oct 25 14:18:46 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 14:18:29 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: false Oct 25 14:18:27 Appliance status Primary uplink status change is_cellular: 2 Oct 25 14:17:51 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 12:05:18 Cellular Cellular connection up local: 100.83.162.83, remote: 100.83.162.84, provider: TeliaDk, connection: AUTO Oct 25 12:02:37 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 12:02:20 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: false Oct 25 12:02:18 Appliance status Primary uplink status change is_cellular: 2 Oct 25 12:01:43 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 09:38:17 Cellular Cellular connection up local: 100.83.217.186, remote: 100.83.217.185, provider: TeliaDk, connection: AUTO Oct 25 09:35:41 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 09:35:19 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: false Oct 25 09:35:17 Appliance status Primary uplink status change is_cellular: 2 Oct 25 09:34:41 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 07:37:24 Cellular Cellular connection up local: 100.67.153.179, remote: 100.67.153.180, provider: TeliaDk, connection: AUTO Oct 25 07:34:48 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true Oct 25 07:34:26 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: false Oct 25 07:34:24 Appliance status Primary uplink status change is_cellular: 2 Oct 25 07:33:49 Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port1, carrier: true
... View more
10-24-2023
12:54 AM
I would say "yes" based on their docs : https://jumpcloud.com/support/authenticate-to-radius-with-azure-ad
... View more
10-23-2023
04:44 AM
1 Kudo
Its here 🙂 Or ... something like it 🙂
... View more
10-17-2023
07:35 AM
1 Kudo
So far ... nothing broken ... BUUUUTT .. on the other hand ... a lot of (some) stuff seems to be missing.
... View more
10-17-2023
12:17 AM
1 Kudo
MX250 remains the same from the previous Sizing guide. And MX450 actually drops from 4 to 2,5 ... Strange.
... View more
10-17-2023
12:16 AM
1 Kudo
For example the previous number for the new boxes was MX105 : 1.5 Gbps MX95 : 1 Gbps MX85 / MX75 : 500 Mbps
... View more
10-17-2023
12:13 AM
They are have been in the Meraki Sizing guide for some time (a couple of months). https://meraki.cisco.com/product-collateral/mx-sizing-guide/?file I always look at the : "Max throughput with all security features enabled", and they have more or less doubled for some of the new MX compared to the old version of sizing guide. I was told that these numbers where taken from 18.2 and have just been patiently waiting for that to be released.
... View more
10-16-2023
11:58 PM
3 Kudos
Yep had that too.
... View more
10-16-2023
11:57 PM
4 Kudos
PS: And RIP : "MX64(W), MX65(W), MX84, MX100, and vMX100 devices will run MX 18.107.5." Sure I understand MX100, it was the oldest of the lot, but MX84 really ? (I know it was a "slow box" in comparison but still).
... View more
10-16-2023
11:56 PM
4 Kudos
And lets not forget 🙂 -
... View more
10-13-2023
03:31 AM
Yeah thats a good question ... Where did that switch go ?
... View more
10-09-2023
01:30 AM
2 Kudos
I had the same thoughts, MR44 and CW9162 more or less have the same price. The question, for us, (form a tech perspective, not looking at possible EOS / EOL times) is do you like 2x2 / 4x4 radio config more then a 2x2 / 2x2 / 2x2 ? 🙂
... View more
09-27-2023
03:30 AM
Did you find a solution ? Did you ever get it to work ?
... View more
09-27-2023
03:27 AM
Did anyone ever get a Cisco AP in WGB mode to connect (and forward traffic) to the equipment behind it ?
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 258 | 08-15-2023 06:00 AM | |
| 1501 | 07-25-2022 02:54 AM | |
| 1109 | 06-23-2022 02:06 PM | |
| 2448 | 09-24-2021 05:46 AM | |
| 1565 | 08-31-2021 06:39 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | 31038 | |
| 6 | 258 | |
| 5 | 308 | |
| 5 | 470 | |
| 5 | 30959 |
