Meraki

ww

Because its one network and the dashboard collects all logging from the AP's. The dashboard knows what happenend and presents that in a smart way/view to us.

ww

There is a summary report page at organization or network wide. There you can select a network and custom date

ww

You have to disable "mandatory dhcp" on the mx dhcp settings https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Configuring_DHCP_Services_on_the_MX_and_MS#.22Run_a_DHCP_Server.22_Options

ww

So u configure this, and then you lose connectivity? .2 is not in use already?

ww

Are you assinging a ip in a switch L3 vlan? Its recommended to have a switch management ip in the vlan on the mx. So that the switch doesnt need to route its own management traffic. Does the mx have routes to the switch vlans?

ww

First step would be to ask the person who manages the radius server for the logging why it send the reject.

ww

Not between lan - wan But on the lan ports its possible https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Networks_and_Routing/MX_Layer_2_Functionality#Spanning_Tree_Protocol_(STP) If the MX received BPDUs on the LAN, these BPDUs will be re-forwarded within the broadcast domain that they were received on

ww

I think its normal,it get 17 on lower and 23 on higher channels here in EU. it has to do with antenna gain and beamforming that you have to add up. Look at te last post here https://community.meraki.com/t5/Wireless/Why-does-the-Target-Power-not-equal-the-Transmit-Power/m-p/156916 Documentation https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Radio_Settings/EU_Compliance_Information

ww

What speed do you see using mx tools > dashboard throughput ? Do you get 500Mb when you connect the client on the isp router ? You using autovpn with a default route? Any shaping configured? is IDS/IPS enabled?

ww

It still doesnt work. Can we still get a 5y lic? And how?

ww

There is. You just assign any vlan to the port(s). You dont need to create or name vlans like catalyst

ww

Organization >early accces. The enable vlan profiles

ww

This doc should cover nat exceptions https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Networks_and_Routing/NAT_Exceptions-No_NAT_on_MX_Security_Appliances#Publicly_routable_LAN_subnets_and_DMZs

ww

Saml users dont have api keys. So that would not be an option

ww

Make a transit vlan/ subnet between the two devices. Then create all static routes with tracking with next hop the other mx ip https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Networks_and_Routing/MX_Routing_Behavior#Static_Route_Tracking This describes it better but instead of mpls you use the fiber https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MPLS_Failover_to_Meraki_Auto_VPN

ww

You would need to use bridge mode on the ssid. Or a syslog server that collects all mr flows to find it.

ww

Did you test that from your lan side? Or from another public ip or public port scan tool? From the outside everything should be denied. Unless you maybe enabled no nat

ww

And all switch-switch connections have native vlan 1? Switch 3 and 4 are also meraki? Who is the root switch in your network?

ww

https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/Port-Forwarding-and-Firewall-Rules/m-p/133567#M33440

ww

All mx and switch trunk ports use the same native vlan? All switch-switch ports have stp enabled? ----- is not a real physical link ?

ww · ‎Dec 16 2024

Get https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/update-network-appliance-traffic-shaping-vpn-exclusions/

ww · ‎Dec 15 2024

That could work. You must connect mg to wan1. Build-in cellular will be used as wan2. https://documentation.meraki.com/Architectures_and_Best_Practices/Cisco_Meraki_Best_Practice_Design/Best_Practice_Design_-_MX_Security_and_SD-WAN/Meraki_SD-WAN#SD-WAN_over_Cellular_Active_Uplink

ww · ‎Dec 15 2024

In case you have client balancing enabled in the wifi profile. Try turning it off

ww · ‎Dec 13 2024

The device didn't receive vrrp packets from the the master. So it moved to active. Then it starts receiving vrrp packets again and moves to backup. Master Down Timer: Time the backup router waits for the IP address owner router advertisements before assuming the role of IP address owner router. Looks like the layer2 connection between the devices is not stable

ww · ‎Dec 11 2024

It is a event of the port going down and up. I assume this is not good when there is a AP connected to that port. This should only happen at firmware upgrades or port/power schedules. Check if the cable is good. and the switch has enough poe power (in case you have many PoE devices)

About ww

ww

Community Record

Badges