Cisco is actively preparing a response to the whitepaper, "AirSnitch: Demystifying and Breaking Client Isolation in Wi-Fi Networks." We anticipate sharing our response within the next week.   At this time, there is no security advisory planned because AirSnitch does not represent a protocol-level vulnerability, such as KRACK or Dragonblood. Additionally, the referenced paper does not introduce new or original findings. This research indicates that the attack leverages fundamental Wi-Fi architectural behaviors that have been part of the standard for a considerable period.   Customers that already adhere to ZTA principals would not be affected. ... View more

This is being worked on and should be available by the end of this Q3FY26. ... View more

Hi, so the email admin@splashaccess.co.uk does not work but +44 (0)845 617 1499 still works?   ... View more

@thomasthomsen please open a support case because we need to clearly distinguish between known PoE issues with CW9172 and dashboard connectivity issues for other models you mentioned. There could be potentially a few know cloud connectivity issues you are hitting and Support should be able to identify the symptoms.  ... View more

@thomasthomsen I'm a little confused because what you are describing sound like cloud connectivity issues, not necessary PoE issues, is that correct?  ... View more

@thomasthomsen could you please let me know the exact combinations of switches + APs and corresponding firmware? ... View more

@Niraj_C the above is correct assuming these are real DFS events. If you believe there should be no other wireless devices, such as airport radars, that can cause these DFS events in your area and that these DFS events are false positives, please open a case with Support. ... View more

Hi @Marwa ,   You can order Wi-Fi 7 APs intended to be managed by Meraki dashboard with either the traditional "co-term" licensing or a new subscription model.   https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/wireless/wi-fi-7-products-licensing-faq.html#Modelsoverviewandavailability       ... View more

@Joem1 have you opened a support case? If you have not, please do. If you have, please DM me the case number. Thank you! ... View more

Yes, we have sent a targeted communication to customers that actually have these APs in their networks. A public documentation is also available.  ... View more

MR36 is Wi-Fi 6 AP is there have no been even end-of-sale announcement yet for this SKU.   Edit: there is nothing in the linked thread about end of life/support for MR36.  ... View more

Yes, I'm confused about the model as well.   There is one big upcoming change that will cause really old APs to be truly disconnected from Meraki Cloud for the first time.   https://documentation.meraki.com/Platform_Management/Product_Information/Compatibility_and_Firmware/Firmware_Upgrades/Overview_and_FAQ%3A_TLS_1.0_and_1.1_Deprecation   We have to do this because TLS 1.0/1.1 protocols used by these APs to talk to Meraki dashboard have been long obsolete. Firmware mitigation is available for some APs that are capable of running MR 26.X or newer firmware. ... View more

Actually, you are right. There should be not dependency between Named VLANs/VLAN profiles and IPv6.   However, I'm a bit confused about this part "In my setup I can't get an IPv6 address via DHCP". Did you mean SLAAC and not DHCP(v6)? There are not many clients that support DHCPv6 and SLAAC is a preferred method of IPv6 assignment. There was a known issue with W-Fi 7 APs but it was resolved in MR 32.1.4:     It would be helpful to take a packet capture on both wired and wireless interfaces to ensure that the AP passes traffic back and forth between an DHCPv6 (if this is indeed in use) and a client. ... View more

@MK2 are you referring to https://documentation.meraki.com/Switching/MS_-_Switches/Design_and_Configure/Configuration_Guides/Port_and_VLAN_Configuration/Named_VLANs_in_MS_Configurations on MS switches?   At least on the wireless side I'm fairly certain that we don't have IPv6 support for named VLANs. ... View more

This is not a supported use case, so please do not use Campus Gateway in this way. If you need a remote SSID termination, please use VPN tunnel data to concentrator MX appliance or another appropriate option. ... View more

There is special firmware release for Campus Gateway and APs in the same network. Please refer to https://documentation.meraki.com/Wireless/Design_and_Configure/Deployment_Guides/Campus_Gateway_Deployment_Guide#Deploying_Campus_Gateway ... View more

Yes, WPN requires bridge mode, obviously.  ... View more

But, in any case, MR52 cannot be upgraded to MR 31.X. Only Wi-Fi 6 and newer APs can be upgraded to MR 31.X. ... View more

Correct, MR52 is limited to MR 30.X branch -   https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Firmware_Upgrades/Product_Firmware_Version_Restrictions    We have another MR 30.X release upcoming with critical fixes for Wave 2 APs. What issues are you trying to resolve? ... View more

I'm assuming you meant CW9162I-MR, Yes, as long as this is a cloud-managed APs running Meraki firmware the Meraki mesh will work. ... View more

Meraki mesh is proprietary and only works between Meraki APs, yes. ... View more