Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join now- About MK2
About MK2
MK2
A model citizen
Member since Jul 2, 2021
Monday
Community Record
168
Posts
104
Kudos
4
Solutions
Badges
After more testing it seems the AP uses somtimes both interfaces.....red marked is the MGMT and green marked is the AMI interface. What the hell I'am doing wrong? 😞
... View more
After massive testing and tickets it seems this feature to be broken. Followed the advice to use DHCP at the AMI instead of static. Did factory resets but at the end, a wireshark of the attached switch port still shows the RADIUS packets to flow with the Mgmt-IP instead of the AMI-IP. I'm really at the end of my tether, I can't update the customer's APs and am stuck in version 28.x. Great.
... View more
Apr 16 2024
11:50 PM
1 Kudo
Done 🙂
... View more
Apr 10 2024
11:41 PM
Maybe Meraki will surprise me with working port profiles next Christmas. Sanata can you hear me....🎅
... View more
Apr 10 2024
11:38 PM
Any news here? Testing a simple mesh topologie and the clients won't be able to use IPv6 over the mesh AP, while Root AP works like a charm.
... View more
It is primarily about the RADIUS feature via the AltMgmt interface. Support has confirmed that there is a problem here and there is currently no fix. The problem is that the requests to the RADIUS are sent via the "normal" and not the "alternative" interface.
... View more
Hello everyone, does anyone here know anything about the function of the AltMgt interfaces in the firmware >MR30.x ? The support knows that it does not work, supposedly they are working on a fix.....but for almost a year now. The whole issue is slowly becoming a show stopper.
... View more
Mar 1 2024
3:07 PM
Tested it again. It is a global setting, even if it says something with SSID that makes me think of WLAN. The problem is the MX firmware MX 18.208, with which there seem to be problems when sending requests from the MX clients via LAN, funnily enough WLAN works - there is no response from the Umbrella DNS servers. Thanks for everything, now I'm smarter again
... View more
Mar 1 2024
12:41 AM
Just another question 🙂 Are the global layer 3 firewall rules attached to a group policy or ignored?
... View more
Feb 29 2024
12:30 PM
Just going to test drive the Umbrella solution. So your recommendation would be to ignore the setting in the screenshot and work with group policies?
... View more
Feb 29 2024
11:55 AM
But if I unlink Umbrelle here, it shows this: And this belongs to WiFi or not? So it seems not to be a general configuration? I have already read the documentation you suggested up and down.
... View more
Feb 29 2024
11:16 AM
Hi everyone, I have a question for you about the Umbrella integration in Meraki. Is the point on the following screenshot a global setting for all subnets on the MX or does it only refer to MX's with integrated WLAN? The setting is under MX > Threat Protection at the bottom. If I want to configure something specifically for subnets or clients, I would do this via the Group Policies, right?
... View more
Dec 27 2023
1:05 AM
ah okay, I just saw that too, so you have to take a closer look. it's a bit confusing. It looks like this for me: (1) shows the name of the ADmin who opened the case, even though I created a post. My name is at the bottom under (2). Maybe as an improvement that (1) also shows the admin who is currently writing something. For now, Happ new year 🙂
... View more
Dec 22 2023
3:26 AM
Hi, for using the "Multi-VLAN support over Mesh" - feature, does this still need to be activated by support? Regarding documentation, there is still a need, but is this up-to-date? Thank you, Marcel
... View more
Dec 22 2023
12:13 AM
Hello, Have any of you ever written a comment in a Meraki case in a ticket from one of your colleagues? I was just surprised that it says that this comment was created by the case creator and not by me. Just wanted to ask if anyone knows this? It's difficult with larger cases if you can't reproduce this here. Christmas greetings🎄🎉 Marcel
... View more
Dec 19 2023
3:56 AM
5 Kudos
Hello, UBNT Unify just drops a cool feature that might helps in onsite support for switching. Watch this and please leave a comment what do you think about this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdSa8BtgZqU I found this is such a cool feature to tag ports (client, server, ap, etc.) instead of using different colored cables or show the port-status. Unify made it more funny tool, but I think this features has potential.
... View more
Dec 18 2023
11:36 PM
Support says that it worked as intended. It's funny that everyone we showed the feature to didn't understand why it was displayed like this. the fact is, everything is correct in the port details, it's only in the "switchports" dashboard that it's wrong for me. Who cares about the "original" VLAN, we want to see the configured and active VLAN! Likewise, if I remove a port profile, it is still displayed. The only workaround is to create a profile with the name "-". I have marked this in orange. The feature itself is great, if it weren't for these two details.
... View more
Dec 18 2023
7:38 AM
Hi community, just a simple question out to you: Does anyone uses port-profiles for MS in a productive environment? I just gave the feature a new try in brown-field deployment and it really sucks. The buggy UI integration shows the "original"-port configuration in somewhat kind that it is really confusing for support to find out which VLAN is in use. This feature has such a great potential, but at the moment it's not my best friend. What do you think?
... View more
That's a real pity, I had hoped that the topic would be treated with more seriousness.
... View more
Hi 🙂 is there anything new on this topic? i'm just about to finish planning a larger LAN project and i'm not really sure if I should already use the port profiles during the rollout - because it's already quite confusing.
... View more
Oct 24 2023
12:10 AM
Hi guys, is this a new view?.....my dashboard is struggeling here:
... View more
Oct 23 2023
10:12 PM
Support is confirming these issues. Requested updates for these bugs. Let's see how long they last.
... View more
Oct 22 2023
10:53 PM
Just playing and found some issues: 1. The Summary page, where a symbolic picture of the MX shows up, says that the Internet1 Port ist disabled? Thats not correct. 2. The release note says more performance but the only thing I could recognize is that the CPU utilization under the "Summary Report" shows 99%? There not so much traffic ongoing - mhhhh.....strange performance enhancement 🙂
... View more
Oct 3 2023
10:35 PM
4 Kudos
It is pictures like these, here just a small IDF, that trigger the horror in me and make me deeply sad on the other side. When the customer says I have VLANs, but it looks more like PLANs (physical...) :D. I said: The coding with the cable colors is yes well solved. Customer: Coding? Um, those were the cables we had at hand. Me: Uffff.... And so on :). I hope one or the other of you knows something like that 😉
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 126 | a week ago | |
| 2330 | Dec 27 2023 1:05 AM | |
| 5445 | Jul 28 2023 5:31 AM | |
| 6800 | Dec 9 2021 11:05 PM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 2372 | |
| 10 | 9366 | |
| 8 | 1318 | |
| 6 | 1683 | |
| 5 | 2423 |
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
