Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About MK2
Community Record
130
Posts
68
Kudos
3
Solutions
Badges
2 weeks ago
1 Kudo
unfortunately nothing seems to have happened yet. unfortunately i have another customer who needs internal nat (between VLANs) and i can't offer him MX now. or does anyone else here have an idea?
... View more
3 weeks ago
Nobody out there using the AD enrollment auth? Any suggestions how to automate the enrollment without this?
... View more
Aug 13 2024
1:47 PM
2 Kudos
Same here. had a very annoying problem with APs (MR) that somehow got stuck in a VLAN after an internet connection failure and would no longer connect to the cloud. There was also a SecureConnect error. I had this at several locations....very strange. But I had the same problem with the questionable error messages as you. somehow it looked different than usual? Has anyone from the deveolpment tested a beta "feature"? 🙂
... View more
Aug 7 2024
11:27 PM
What I need is learning content for 500-220 ECMS Exam. CMNA is for free, there is very good content on the Meraki Learning plattform.
... View more
Aug 7 2024
11:07 PM
You mean which plattform? Wanted to buy only the ECMS2 part, because ECMS1 not really good. Just found the CMNE-F learning, at it seems to be much better that the paid ECMS course with nearly the same content.
... View more
Aug 7 2024
10:15 AM
Is there anybody who knows why the ECMS2 Part2 V2.1 is know longer avaiable on Cisco Learning? Only the complete V1 package is still there avaiable. Regards, Marel
... View more
Aug 1 2024
11:44 PM
Hi, I am still confused about the changelog entry of the current agent version 4.2.2. It says the following: [Update] Removed support for Active Directory enrollment authentication (local unencrypted LDAP proxy). Does this mean that the connection to the AD no longer works? I had opened a ticket and was told that LDAPS (secure) would work. On my test client, however, I don't see a single request going out to the domain controller in Wireshark.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
Jul 29 2024
12:43 AM
Hello, is there any news or a date on a roadmap when IPv6 will be implemented for meshed APs? It is very difficult to explain to a customer why a wired AP works fine and a meshed AP is a nightmare because resolved hostnames cannot be reached with IPv6.
... View more
I can confirm that 30.7 also fixed the issue. 🚀🎉
... View more
Just tested 31.1.1 and it runs as if nothing had happened 😎. 30.7 I'am going to test out now.
... View more
Hello, Support answered with 31.1.1 it should be fixed, but this is untested from my point. I test this next week and report back.
... View more
No, the RADIUS is located in a different network, it's also a different network class. MR29.7.1 is the latest version in which it works as expected, either with DHCP or static IPs on the Mgmt and AMI interface.
... View more
After more testing it seems the AP uses somtimes both interfaces.....red marked is the MGMT and green marked is the AMI interface. What the hell I'am doing wrong? 😞
... View more
After massive testing and tickets it seems this feature to be broken. Followed the advice to use DHCP at the AMI instead of static. Did factory resets but at the end, a wireshark of the attached switch port still shows the RADIUS packets to flow with the Mgmt-IP instead of the AMI-IP. I'm really at the end of my tether, I can't update the customer's APs and am stuck in version 28.x. Great.
... View more
Apr 16 2024
11:50 PM
1 Kudo
Done 🙂
... View more
Apr 10 2024
11:41 PM
Maybe Meraki will surprise me with working port profiles next Christmas. Sanata can you hear me....🎅
... View more
Apr 10 2024
11:38 PM
Any news here? Testing a simple mesh topologie and the clients won't be able to use IPv6 over the mesh AP, while Root AP works like a charm.
... View more
It is primarily about the RADIUS feature via the AltMgmt interface. Support has confirmed that there is a problem here and there is currently no fix. The problem is that the requests to the RADIUS are sent via the "normal" and not the "alternative" interface.
... View more
Hello everyone, does anyone here know anything about the function of the AltMgt interfaces in the firmware >MR30.x ? The support knows that it does not work, supposedly they are working on a fix.....but for almost a year now. The whole issue is slowly becoming a show stopper.
... View more
Mar 1 2024
3:07 PM
Tested it again. It is a global setting, even if it says something with SSID that makes me think of WLAN. The problem is the MX firmware MX 18.208, with which there seem to be problems when sending requests from the MX clients via LAN, funnily enough WLAN works - there is no response from the Umbrella DNS servers. Thanks for everything, now I'm smarter again
... View more
Mar 1 2024
12:41 AM
Just another question 🙂 Are the global layer 3 firewall rules attached to a group policy or ignored?
... View more
Feb 29 2024
12:30 PM
Just going to test drive the Umbrella solution. So your recommendation would be to ignore the setting in the screenshot and work with group policies?
... View more
Feb 29 2024
11:55 AM
But if I unlink Umbrelle here, it shows this: And this belongs to WiFi or not? So it seems not to be a general configuration? I have already read the documentation you suggested up and down.
... View more
Feb 29 2024
11:16 AM
Hi everyone, I have a question for you about the Umbrella integration in Meraki. Is the point on the following screenshot a global setting for all subnets on the MX or does it only refer to MX's with integrated WLAN? The setting is under MX > Threat Protection at the bottom. If I want to configure something specifically for subnets or clients, I would do this via the Group Policies, right?
... View more
Dec 27 2023
1:05 AM
ah okay, I just saw that too, so you have to take a closer look. it's a bit confusing. It looks like this for me: (1) shows the name of the ADmin who opened the case, even though I created a post. My name is at the bottom under (2). Maybe as an improvement that (1) also shows the admin who is currently writing something. For now, Happ new year 🙂
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1061 | Dec 27 2023 1:05 AM | |
| 2840 | Jul 28 2023 5:31 AM | |
| 2922 | Dec 9 2021 11:05 PM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | 1618 | |
| 8 | 870 | |
| 6 | 1053 | |
| 5 | 1620 | |
| 4 | 4035 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
