About PhilipDAth

Nyenti

This problem can only be resolved by Meraki support. There is no customer facing resolution for this problem yet. I had this same issue today and Meraki explained to me that the MX has a missing parameter and only Meraki has a back-end fix at this time. Call support and it will take 5 mins to resolve

Felipe1

Hi, My problem has been solved. With a simple support contact. Engineer response: We have applied a backend fix to mount the storage so that MX starts fetching configuration from the cloud. thanks

Bruce

Great idea @cmr, we can all make our own 😀

AGAPL

a. APs remain online this time. b. We observe " 802.11 disassociation " this message while AP doesn't work c. No availability schedule is configured

pp

Thanks. Upgraded last night and it looks good so far.

NeildSb

no, scratch my previous update, Meraki does not play nice with non-meraki equipment, you have no control over LLDP on Meraki equipment unlike a less sophisticated Netgear Pro device???

Fabian1

Okay, I wrote a "make a wish" in dashboard. I can't imagine that it is too difficult to implement this feature. Let's wait then... Thank you guys

Bruce

On your access policy is the Host Mode set to Multi-Domain - sounds like you are doing 802.1x on both the voice and data networks. It should be refusing the second auth attempt if it’s not in multi-domain mode, but I’m wondering if there is some weirdness occurring.

AussieKP

Thanks Philip for confirming. Yeah, I imagine the L2 adjacent MX's in diverse DC's is going to be a hard fit for most/all. The customer would need to stretch every WAN and LAN interface between both DC's. Would result in split brain at some point. Hopefully, they will add more full-featured OSPF in the future.

Greenberet

I think a better option would be to get an NVR on site which supports RTSP. The cameras will stream their image locally to the NVR which saves the video on disk. That way you won't have to worry about internet bandwith or even outages and you have a backup of the video just in case if the camera gets damaged.

PhilipDAth

Here is a good statistic for you @John-K . I got these numbers from Google, so ... The number of daily active users for each service: Teams = 115m daily active users WebEx = 60m diaily active users Slack = 12m daily active users Obviously, Cisco WebEx needs to be supported as a first-class citizen. After that, the business case is pretty strong as to what the next most loved platform should be ...

RamShear

Just in case someone else someday has the same question: In Apple Business Manager, In the 'Devices' view, if you select 'All Devices' there is an option to download a .csv file of your full DEP device list which includes both Serial Number and IMEI (labeled 'Device_ID') Thanks for the responses.

PhilipDAth

The VMX was available in only one size. That has been replaced with three different sizes, small, medium and large. https://meraki.cisco.com/product/security-sd-wan/virtual-appliances/vmx-small/

ww

Mx does not learn or advertise routes in 3rd party vpn. You have look into pfsense documentation for routes to the lan and for vpn

ChrisLaird

It's a configuration test software from Laerdal medical. We're in the process of making changes to the way their devices communicate, so we're running the configuration verification tool and it's failing on the network pieces. We have their configuration guide for normal Cisco controllers, which walks through adding custom mdns strings and modifying settings, but there's nothing for Meraki.

PhilipDAth

Haha, that is funny. Unless it is true. Then it is sad.

PhilipDAth

This has links to the setup on both sides. https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Tools_and_Troubleshooting/Link_Aggregation_and_Load_Balancing#Configuring_Link_Aggregation_between_MS_and_Cisco_Switches

PhilipDAth

Why don't you remove the public IPs from the VMs?

PhilipDAth

For just Microsoft Teams, I asked to go onto this beta: https://community.meraki.com/t5/Developers-APIs/Now-in-beta-Send-Meraki-dashboard-alerts-directly-into-your/m-p/110804 I configured the WebHook to send it in slack format. I followed these instructions to enable a WebHook in Microsoft Teams. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/platform/webhooks-and-connectors/how-to/connectors-using#setting-up-a-custom-incoming-webhook And Voila!

PhilipDAth

If you don't have inbound NAT, you could instead plug the two MXs into an ISP router. My preference - get an MG21, and plug the Internet2 ports on the two MX into the MG21. Then you have real HA. 🙂

CptnCrnch

I don't think I'm getting the point here?!

EJN

Just saw partial of this on my dashboard. Cannot wait for full roll out. I would love to see a menu option called Health where you can configure some of these options (separate but related to alerts).

Cody1

Congrats to everyone!

marketdrayton

Was there any success with this failure. I too am seeing clients fail with this result. Yet differing hardware (DX80) connection is fine and stable. The clients are "typically" WiFi6 clients. reason: reserved.

Greenberet

Thank you very much 😃

PhilipDAth

Community Record

Badges