Try connecting the laptop to the same camera port and check what IP it is getting. If it is getting the same 192.168.3.X series IP then on the laptop you will get the DHCP server details through which you could identify which DHCP server/system is creating the issue. ... View more

A common approach for your network would look something like this.   - No direct link between MXs - Lowest physical port(s) of "Active" stack member switch become root port(s), port(s) on the member switch in the stack would be in STP blocking under normal conditions - All LAN ports on the MXs and MSs would be trunks, allow all VLANs (or you can specify the exact VLANs in use if you like), and have matching native VLANs - The native VLAN can be whatever you want. Often that could be the mgmt VLAN for the Switches for config simplicity.  - Use link aggregation groups between the MS425 stack and the downstream Switches     @DevinM what issues are you currently seeing with the deployment today? ... View more

@CloudStrife we decided to leave as-is (orange) since it seems that folks have gotten used to it. ... View more

>the question now arises as to whether I really have to make the detour via the Azure portal -> Enterprise apps -> Meraki dashboard every time to log in to the dashboard   Typically, this is how an Idp flow works.  The customer goes to their Idp portal, and then clicks on the app then want to access.   For me personally, I have added it to the app launcher, so it is no more than two clicks away.  When I am in any Office 365 web apps (which I live in) I click on the 9 dot launcher, then "Meraki Dashboard" - bam - I'm in the Merak Dashboard all logged in.   If you can get it down to less than 2 mouse clicks let me know.     ... View more

Thanks for responding.. I had a feeling that was the case. Open wish list for me having that page with a user vote option would be great so the community would have the ability to vote what our needs are. Don't get me wrong this single is would be rated as a low, but our feels of what the rating are as a collective view could be wrong.    Either way I do thank you for taking the time to share this info and listen to my random thoughts. ... View more

It appears to want something selected even for the disabled SSIDs. So, just check any of the boxes for SSIDs 2-4 and it should save. They're disabled so it doesn't matter anyway.  ... View more

Yeah I know, I wish Meraki would put as much effort into fixing know issues as they do into new features! ... View more

That's the goal ... View more

Hi,   my devices are mostly set to ignore, but some has greyed out with option set to upgrade as scheduled.  how can I change this? ... View more

I haven't done it a lot - maybe half a dozen times.  It has always worked for me.   This document has two sections, combining and then splitting networks. https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Organizations_and_Networks/Combined_Dashboard_Networks#How_to_Combine_Networks   ... View more

Whilst it isn't user-serviceable, it's also not an IP rated camera; as guarantees aren't provided for preventing ingress it likely wouldn't hit the criteria for replacement under an RMA. I'd agree with Ryan on dislodging any debris inside with some gentle percussive maintenance. ... View more

MV52 aperture is not user adjustable just FYI ... View more

Is there any bug documentation on this you could share? ... View more

Maybe this has changed over time, not sure. Anyhow you can edit Sensor profiles including the Default profile for template bound networks.   Sensor Alerts have always existed at the network level for template bound networks. The config doesn't live under the template. ... View more

I'm able to ping now the other device on the other VLAN, looks like it's working...Thanks a bunch! ... View more

MXxxW existis because not all MXs are / need to be / can be locked away in the bowels of a building.   The best use case I came across for these was for a customer who hired out large meeting rooms / small offices for relatively short periods and wanted to stand up a secure 'office in a box' at very short notice - simply by sticking the MX on the desk.    Getting coverage from there was not a problem, with the built-in antennas. For me this comes back to good practise for WiFi ; survey what's needed on a site-by-site basis. It's then about using the right tool (or right set of tools) for the right job. I should probably have caveated my own initial comment too;  'in most cases'  probably reflects the larger businesses I cover.   In SMB 'most cases' might well best suit an appliance with built-in Wi-Fi. ... View more

Just a fyi for anyone seeing similar, the issue has bubbled through the layers of support and is now with the Meraki engineering team.   ... View more

I got the solution for this for those who run into it. If you have your one time codes that are listed under your profile then you can use that to log in to the dashboard.  If you are logged in, you can disable 2FA via "My Profile" by following the steps linked below: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Other_Topics/Two-Factor_Authentication#Disabling_Two-Factor_Authentication Please note that in order to do this, a full organization administrator must first disable the organization-wide setting "Force users to set up and use two-factor authentication". To disable this, navigate to Organization > Configure > Settings > Security > Two-factor authentication > Uncheck the box After disabling the organization setting and disabling 2FA on your profile, it can be set back up using new configurations, and the organization setting can be re-enabled. Once you disable 2FA, you can reenable and a qr code will appear.  Disabling the organization-wide "Two-factor authentication" setting will not disable or change MFA/2FA for any users. This feature forces new users to set up two-factor authentication, and if it has been set up, those users will still need to use 2FA to login. After disabling this setting and disabling your account's 2FA from "My Profile", the setting can be re-enabled. ... View more

The risks of continuing to use an End of Life device are generally one or all of these: You can no longer get a replacement device via Meraki Support, if the hardware fails. You will no longer receive firmware updates or fixes, lincluding for bugs and/or security fixes. Meraki Support will no longer provide substantial support in the event that you have a problem with the device. Remember too that, in order to keep the device working, you do still need to ensure the license is kept up.   So;  the relative value received from that license drops significantly.    In most cases, any residual value for remaining license time on a device you want to replace will (or can) be retained for a new Meraki device, deployed in its place. ... View more

Thanks 👍 ... View more

Yes, but this is a different issue. Just creating this rule will cause the behavior.    ... View more