Meraki

AD01 · ‎Apr 4 2022

Hi PhilipDAth, appreciate your response. Yeah, it seems this would be a "nice to have" future feature. I think it is extremely useful considering it is a FW device.

John_on_API · ‎Apr 1 2022

Yes, when the features ships GA, it will become part of the public API spec, and then the following version of the Python SDK would be generated to include it.

MarcP · ‎Mar 28 2022

Oh, you had configured an IPSec on the DB as well... MX IPSec traffic was put into the DB IPSec tunnel.

david_n_m_bond · ‎Feb 10 2022

Accepted as solution: "the documentation is way too vague and doesn't contain the right info or correct info." ...as well as providing a solution to the specific nightmare I was suffering! Thanks, @RaphaelL 🙂

Mike6116 · ‎Nov 5 2021

I whitelisted the server to wich the remote peers connect to, and then did a firmware upgrade and the remote clients connected with no issues, so i will keep this config for now, i will let know meraki support about this, because i have an open support ticket. Thanks

cmr · ‎Oct 9 2021

Upgraded the switch to 14.32 and the issue is now fixed Thank you Meraki team 😎

jay_b · ‎Sep 24 2021

@cmr That makes sense. Thank you!

Bruce · ‎Sep 17 2021

@CharlieCrackle, generally replacements with the standard warranty are Next Business Day, but the official line is they ship within one business day on a best effort basis. It’s those last 5 words which are the gotcha. If you need a more solid replacement agreement then you need to look at Meraki Now, which is somewhat equivalent to Cisco SmartNet. I believe it’s only then do these devices get factored into Cisco’s sparing model to ensure there is adequate supply in local depots.

Rodrigo_ · ‎Sep 7 2021

Hi Everyone This technically works if all antennas are the same. (using that antenna) However, you would lose 5Ghz band which is a big drawback. You can find more info 🙂 https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Other_Topics/Frequently_Asked_Questions_regarding_Cisco_Meraki_Antennas You should never use single-band antennas on a dual-band antenna port. It will work only for that single band and you will have bad behaviors everywhere else. All antennas in these kind of APs should be the same.

RumorConsumer · ‎Aug 24 2021

I removed it and saved and then re-entered it and then deleted again and try to whole bunch of weird delete re-add save combinations and then all of a sudden VPN started working 🙈

Bruce · ‎Aug 6 2021

@rhbirkelund its to cover a link failure between the MX and switch (or indeed a failure of SWX1 itself). If you lose the link from the Primary MX to SWX1 (or SWX1 itself) then both the MX devices will go active, both will try and build tunnels to the hub (and so advertise themselves as the path to their subnets), and if you are running a VIP on the WAN both MXs will claim the VIP. All of this can cause issues of different magnitudes depending on your design. This occurs because the heartbeats between the MXs stop (due to the link or switch failure), but the MXs are still both alive and so believe the other MX is dead. Having both the links from each MX to both switches adds a layer of protection you wouldn't get otherwise. It would be great to hear that if there are no active links on the LAN side then a MX won't go 'active', it will assume a standby role, but so far as I'm aware this isn't the case.

John_on_API · ‎Jul 21 2021

I'd check your actual API usage. How many other users (or applications) have API keys? You have to share the budget with those other folks in the same org. Even if your usage hasn't changed, there are likely others using API more, thus competing with your usage. In the API docs, check Organizations > Monitor > API Requests for the two endpoints that give you this info.

MeredithW · ‎Jul 7 2021

UDPATE: this contest has ended. Huge thanks to everyone who updated and submitted their new avatars — we thoroughly enjoyed all of your interesting submissions! Congrats to our randomly selected sock winners: @Michael_Venema and @SMontgomery.

rhbirkelund · ‎Jul 2 2021

Unfortunately no. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Client_VPN/Client_VPN_Overview

PhilipDAth · ‎Jun 18 2021

>Country Code - Site ID/Code/ - switch Number I tren to use something similar to @DarrenOC . Sometimes I used the nearest international airport code as well (depends on how many sites they have in different areas). https://www.ccra.com/airport-codes/

rhbirkelund · ‎May 28 2021

@mmistretta wrote: [...] it wasn't until after configuring the local and remote IDs, the tunnel came up. Which is also a change in behaviour for MX15.42.1 firmware. From release notes;

Kenneth_rf · ‎May 6 2021

I have the same problem. Anyone know if there is a solution?

PhilipDAth · ‎May 2 2021

I'm betting on the MV72X.

Bruce · ‎Apr 27 2021

@rossmeraki glad you got it working - always good to see the simplicity of the Meraki kit in action 😀

antmich · ‎Apr 26 2021

Hi @rhbirkelund ! I ended up finding what the issue was. The AP was in survey mode as expected, but for some reason the broadcasted SSID was hidden ? I haven't found why and couldn't configure it differently, so I just kept going my survey knowing the SSID was hidden.

VGXI-ITSupport · ‎Apr 26 2021

That was all completed correctly. I called support and they stated that they could not understand why it was still showing up. They clear it. Case closed.

rhbirkelund · ‎Mar 30 2021

Regarding the SKU types, the vMX-M does not choose the IP SKU for you. You have to choose it yourself. There’s four different types, and the exact difference in performance I have no idea. But you need to choose the right one, because depending on what you choose you’ll not able to utilise ClientVPN due to some firewall rules that are being applied the IP SKU.

CptnCrnch · ‎Mar 22 2021

What about monitoring with statuspage.io for example?

cmr · ‎Feb 9 2021

@NolanHerring after @KarstenI 's post I just upgraded all our sites and they seem to be working okay. At the moment we have hardly any traffic so cannot be 100% sure that there aren't some issues but I'm planning to go to a mixed site next week and will do some testing to confirm that there aren't issues.

GreenMan · ‎Jan 15 2021

I have had this happen, in the past, on maybe two occasions, where this fix has worked (and maybe on different cameras, I think) - it certainly hasn't been something I've needed to apply regularly. If you get regular recurrences, I would raise a case with the Support team and mention what you've had and what you've done.

About rhbirkelund

rhbirkelund

Community Record

Badges