- About Bruce
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Community Record
22
Posts
22
Kudos
3
Solutions
Badges
a week ago
@Mosquitar,if, as your post suggests, you are replacing a member of a switch stack rather than a standalone switch then please have a look at this document, Replacing and Cloning Stack Members, as the process is slightly different to a straight Clone and Replace, and if its not done properly you can end up with other issues (key point is making sure the replacement switch is on the same firmware as the stack - check on the device status page - before adding it to the stack).
... View more
2 weeks ago
The Dashboard API provides the Latitude and Longitude of a device, e.g. an AP (obviously based on where you position it), and likewise the Scanning API provides the Latitude and Longitude of an endpoint/client (which is based on correctly aligning your imported floor plans with Google Maps), so you should be able to achieve whatever you require one way or another.
... View more
2 weeks ago
Not something I've done, but ultimately you'll need a RADIUS server that integrates with your Google directory. You could look at Fox Pass or Jump Cloud if you want something cloud based. Or as you said something like freeRADIUS which you'd then need to integrate with your Google directory. If you're doing WPA2-Enterprise then the certificate trust is between the wireless client and the RADIUS server (not the Meraki access point), and potentially also between the RADIUS server and the directory if that connection is secure too.
... View more
2 weeks ago
Just to add to the good advice that everyone has provided below. You might also want to look at using Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) if you want to try and block access by device type. It is generally more robust at determining the device type and may serve your purpose well - but that said, it is obviously more $$$, which may not be wanted.
... View more
2 weeks ago
Once you've got your initial status of devices, if you are then looking for alerts on those devices you could look at using Webhooks (https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Other_Topics/Webhooks) so that you don't exceed the API rate limit - just depends on what the goal of your solution is.
... View more
2 weeks ago
Just another suggestion to check - which I'm not sure will be relevant or not, but might be worth checking. Does the Connection Request Policy you are hitting also have EAP selected as an Authentication method? If the Connection Request Policy doesn't have EAP specifically selected as an Authentication Method then the type of EAP isn't passed through to the Network Policy, and so this can cause the unknown EAP type error.
... View more
3 weeks ago
So I just re-read your description, are the clients with problems on the SSID that is using the Meraki DHCP? And does the rest of the network use the 192.168.2.0/24 subnet?
... View more
3 weeks ago
When you are using client isolation on the wireless is only allows traffic to the subnet gateway, see Wireless Client Isolation. Therefore if you have everything in one VLAN using the same subnet then the clients in the isolated WLAN can only communicate with the gateway IP address. If you move the isolated WLAN to another subnet then they should be able to communicate with the printers since the traffic will go via the subnet gateway.
... View more
3 weeks ago
1 Kudo
Just to follow this up, if you want to try it again, then you need the trunk between the switch and the access point, as ClaytonMeyer wrote, and then for each SSID you need to configure it to tag the traffic. In the Meraki Dashboard go to Wireless -> Access Control, and under the Addressing and traffic section you need to be in 'Bridge mode', and then set VLAN tagging to 'Use VLAN tagging', and then for the VLAN ID, set All other APs to the VLAN ID for the SSID - so for SSID.1 set the VLAN ID to 100, then change to SSID.2 make the configuration changes again and set the VLAN ID to 200, and so on. If the wired part of the network is correctly configured then this should then tag the traffic from each SSID with the appropriate VLAN tag. Just remember that if the DHCP server isn't on the same VLAN/subnet as the client then you'll also need to configure DHCP forwarding for that VLAN/subnet.
... View more
3 weeks ago
Just to check a couple of things that I've come across in the past... (although admittedly this was on a Windows Server 2012 R2 server). Make sure that the the 'Extensible Authentication Protocol' service on the Windows Server running NPS is not disabled (it should be set to Manual), and make sure that you have registered the NPS server with Active Directory. Both of these can prevent EAP with user credentials working.
... View more
3 weeks ago
2 Kudos
The Meraki DHCP doesn't operate as a full DHCP server per se. It creates the client IP address using a hash of the client's MAC address, and responds with that and a gateway and DNS server of 10.128.128.128 - which is an IP address that the access point responds to. The access point then proxies the DNS requests from the clients to the DNS servers it has configured (i.e. the ones you can see on the main access point summary/dashboard page), so you need to ensure that the access point can reach these DNS servers. By using this approach if the client roams to another access point it will most likely receive the same IP address, and maintain the same gateway and DNS server, so it will be as seamless as is possible without using any of the various roaming technologies/protocols out there.
... View more
10-26-2017
09:20 PM
1 Kudo
As @WadeAlsup eludes to, I wouldn't be using both the wireless from an MX65W appliance and MR devices in the same environment. The MR devices have many more capabilities and you may experience roaming issues, security issues, or more if you have the same SSID configured on the MX65W wireless and the MR devices (and it means you're configuring the wireless in two places too). Best advice is use one or the other not both.
... View more
09-04-2017
12:22 AM
1 Kudo
The Meraki content filtering on the access points is pretty rudimentary and relies on a list of sites maintained by Meraki to prevent access to adult content. However, they do also offer the option to use 'Custom DNS' which would allow you the capability to use a much more full-featured solution such as Cisco Umbrella (previously OpenDNS) to achieve more dynamic control. It's also worth noting that beyond the content filtering the access points also offer capability around firewalling, application based traffic shaping, and user based traffic shaping.
... View more
09-01-2017
01:05 AM
It's definitely still coming :) Keep in contact with your local Meraki team if you want to know more.
... View more
08-21-2017
02:59 PM
2 Kudos
Just be aware that the vMX isn't a full MX appliance virtualised. It's capability is designed for access into the AWS cloud through a head-end VPN termination point. Thus the feature set is heavily focused on VPN and SD-WAN - the firewall functionality isn't there.
... View more
08-20-2017
10:45 PM
7 Kudos
Unfortunately you can't use Cisco AnyConnect with the Meraki MX appliances. I know this is a common request, and hopefully its one that will come about soon, hit that 'Make a Wish' button a bit more. Although Cisco AnyConnect client can create an IPSec tunnel, it only uses IKE v2 for the initial negotiations, whereas the MX appliances only do IKE v1 at the moment - that I believe is the problem.
... View more
08-14-2017
03:25 PM
2 Kudos
I'd agree with @MerakiJockey505 in that I wouldn't be using a Z1 for 10-15 users, its aimed for more around the 5 user mark. Depending on your requirements, whether you need any wired ports at the site, you could do a MX64W or MX65W, or just the MX64 or MX65 with an 'small' external access point, maybe the MR33 - you get more flexibility\capability with the MR series than with the wireless built into the MX/Z devices. The other option if you only need wireless is the MR Teleworker VPN, but I've never used it so I can't vouch for whether it works well or not - others may be able to. As to the bandwidth, that's a bit subjective, it all depends what the staff at the remote site are going to be doing. If they're going to be pulling large amounts of data from the parent site over the VPN then I'd be recommending the larger bandwidth, on the other hand if they're mainly autonomous and occasionally accessing Office 365 for email, for example, then you might get away with the smaller bandwidth.
... View more
08-14-2017
03:07 PM
Other than just getting a list of the clients that were on the network, was there anything more specific you were trying to achieve?
... View more
08-09-2017
02:31 AM
1 Kudo
What @MerakiJockey505 says is completely correct. But if you can't see 'Traffic analytics' under the Network-wide menu you need to switch on the detailed host name gathering. Go to Network-wide then configure, General. You'll see a Traffic analytics drop down, change this to Detailed: collect destination hostnames. Now, give it a little while and you'll start seeing the traffic destinations in the places @MerakiJockey505 describes. Hope this helps.
... View more
Latest Tags
No tags yet
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 70 | 2 weeks ago | |
| 1003 | 08-14-2017 03:25 PM | |
| 2216 | 08-09-2017 02:31 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | 7266 | |
| 2 | 136 | |
| 2 | 12582 | |
| 2 | 1003 | |
| 1 | 100 |
