You'll notice Merkai support didn't mention the higher cost hardware and license 😉 FYI, my (10) Z3s finally shipped, just a slight delay. ... View more

We had issues on the 15.x train. We had to roll back to 14.4. ... View more

So this is also applicable with Meraki MX Devices right?  ... View more

@joe  Thanx .. 🙂 I'm checking it out .. Looks crisp ..   Needs something on the security center part though .. Could be nice to have it in the overview part ..   With Highest regards Thyge ... View more

Indeed looks more like a Nexus series and nowhere near a Meraki device. fyi, nexus 3524-X and 3548-X is the same 48 port switch hardware but just with only 24 ports enabled ( by license) in the 3524-X model. ... View more

I agree that nobody is perfect Brett and I'm not expecting that.  I did however challenge them several times about the upgrade policy as I was aware of the conversion policy previously but didn't know if it was a monthly or timed promotion.  I do thank you for all of your help on this community forum. ... View more

So Microsoft a few months ago started advertising how they had just a couple summaries that covered their entire suite of O365, etc. It was a fairly large range, but I was calling Bullock's on it since there was little documentation on it and their articles with the smaller summaries were not updated. Now I can't find anything on those small summaries, so maybe they retracted it. ... View more

It was a country block.  My boss blocks almost all countries.  We do no do international business. With so many countries blocked, it was not feasible to remove and add back to determine which.  Turned out to be Ireland.  Unblocked (with much malice). ... View more

Packet captures can be done on almost every device, if not all. I just checked some of my networks and everything had the option (Z3 included): security appliances, wireless, switches, cameras. ... View more

Seems that my license info is now offering PDL as an alternative to co-term. As far as I´m concerned some new offerings like the Advanced wireless lics (Umbrella features embedded to dashboard) require this licensing model but for most part co-term is my way to go here. Good thing that the converting process seems to be a guided tour so that people will not make any bad judgments.   Seems that PDL is the way to go if your org setup is on some type of parent org, sub org with each sub org. Thinking about franchise business where a chain of some sort of sexy branded business would offer network services with Meraki and individual business owners would join the "fiesta" as per own contractual terms. ... View more

For me the Meraki DHCP is great, easy to use, and pretty fail safe from my experience.  However, no P2P means some Apple functions (and others I'm sure) will not work. ... View more

We provide all of our home VPN users with a Z3 and have no issue with the licensing. The Z3s are awesome. If you have any road warriors, I highly recommend the Z3C. ... View more

I believe ANY means any IP which traverses it as a L3 router. For example if you had a downstream switch, ANY on the MX would not apply to layer 2 adjacent traffic. Also, ANY on the MX is both for subnets local to the MX and any subnets coming over autovpn. ... View more

With that query to the api you receive the status of all of your devices, is a good way to do not pull each device... with hundred of devices is a good option because with one query of milliseconds you have all status of the devices. With some scripting is easy to parse the individual information.     https://api.meraki.com/api/v0/organizations/3232/deviceStatuses ... View more

I don't see it anymore either =( I can't seem to find another link ... View more

Correction we are not going to use the VPN.  ... View more

I don't use AutoVPN as MX is connecting to non-meraki peer. I also can't configure static route for the subnet because dashboard throws me an error:   There were errors in saving this configuration: The static LAN route "Bypass_VPN" has an invalid next hop IP. The IP address <an address of my ISP> is not on a configured subnet.   ... View more

Why don't you define a performance class and let the MX choose the best ISP automatically?  There is an example for Web traffic. https://documentation.meraki.com/Architectures_and_Best_Practices/Cisco_Meraki_Best_Practice_Design/Best_Practice_Design_-_MX_Security_and_SD-WAN/Meraki_SD-WAN#PbR_with_Performance_Failover_for_Web_traffic    What is actually doing the dot1x?  A switch behind the MX, an MX, an MR, something else? ... View more

I did find the blue circles comical...lol. The best drawing I have seen showing a network loop. ... View more

As an update, AT&T sees an issue with 8.8.8.8 but has offered no solution other than it is a google issue, although 8.8.4.4 is fine and 8.8.8.8 via WAN 2 is fine. ... View more

I have the same situation (although on a much smaller geographical scale).   40 separate buildings with people sometimes traversing between them.  One organization, 40 'networks' beneath them, an SSID configured identically between all 40 buildings to allow those folks to roam. ... View more

I would second the whitelisting approach. This works well in this sort of scenario ... View more

Oh, I didn't go that far back in the logs to see that! I have actually been chatting with support, hoping to test this out. ... View more