Hi ! I had to address my Cisco PAM with a NFR quote and had quite a struggle to convince them, that Meraki ambasadors like us are great marketing investments (hence should have the licenses for free). Since no real cost is involved for Cisco, this should be a fairly simple argument ..  But .. not ..    @Meraki : Maybe we could get an official statement ? ... View more

We have very large catamaran ferry for commuters .. in the VIP lounge this little fellow hides out .. On the top of the ferry, two large antennae ensures connectivity to the landbased stations ..     ... View more

Great news ..   .. But .. no official statement here confirming ? ... View more

I would like to hear more from official channels !! I have made substantiel private investments in demo equipment, outbuilding my original CMNA setup.   Please enlighten us with the way forward for us dedicated Meraki's .. ... View more

Funny thing, that this stil persists across all the switching SW trails .. ... View more

It's still on .. We see it on various switch models and software versions, included the recommended ones .. What we seem to conclude is, that most often it is yielded by workstations/docks or printers ..     ... View more

So .. Basically we have nothing to show our compliance board in terms of CVE coverage and MX software/Meraki software ? ... View more

Hi Darren ! .. These are more directed towards other devices than the MX firewall itself ?? ... View more

Hi Cmr 😀 Got that .. The concern I got was that the update rate of the MX firmware is not impressive, if the CVE resolution is done this way, if You compare to ie Firepower and other firewalls Hot-Fix services..   Seen with management eyes, they see the MX left "un-safe" longer than other firewalls ..   Where do we have docu that shows that MX's are updated as quickly as all the other Cisco firewalls ?   ... View more

Wow ! 😀 Thanx Alembrahao! That was a neat piece of code !!  I will do a routine using that (and of course have Your credits in there) .. Maybe we some time in the future will get same tools for ports in every device .. ... View more

🙂 Just for fun did a couple of tests on a private installation: Setup: ISP->SW1->SW2->AP (daisy-chained) Sw1: MS120-8FP: 18.2Mbps Sw2: MS120-8LP: 20.7Mbps AP: MR33: 428.4Mbps .. 🙂 ... View more

💪That was a good tip! Especially if the PT100 probe reports in the same format as the sensor for MT11 and maybe even with the same physical interface ? Have You tested it (even though our friends here from Meraki does not recommend it) ?   ... View more

Hi Larry .. Challenge: The probes only allows +55 Celcius as max ..   Situation: If ie we were to monitor outlet from heating systems, boilers etc. reaching temperatures way over the limits of the provided probes .. And it would be a shame not to use these MT's since we deploy wall2wall Meraki .. ... View more

Hi All ! And Happy IT Professionals Day !! 😁   One of my greatest inspirations is Ib Hansen (https://www.linkedin.com/in/hansenib/) who helped me start up my CCIE Study back in the days .. Kept contact for nearly 20 years now .. Thanx !! And I will gladly share the prize (with some fluid content) with him 😋   And of course all You contributants here in the Meraki Community !!   / Thyge   ... View more

Hi 🙂 Docks: It is a merry mix of Lenovo and Dell dockings with different firmware.. Switches: 14.33.1 ... View more

@sas-brockett @Anonymous  Well .. we see it A LOT also.. and I was hoping, that people would share any info/experience they have had (ie with Support cases) or any remedy to help .. We have feeling that ports serving ie phones or in-device-switching/porting like dock's tend to do this, but would like to hear other oppinions   ... View more

That makes some sort of reason 😀. We were just confused since the numbers made no sense, when we looked on the topology ..   ... View more

😀I see that, and why  ..   What I don't get is: What is the intention with the tool then ? If it is a CPU dependent measure, it could be a % then .. ? My expectation was not a WAN performance tool, but a management/Meraki cloud control meter ..   Regards Thyge   ... View more

🙂 Agree 🙂   I think I need to understand what the tool is meant for .. I thought it was something like: What is the box experiencing of link expectation/performance from the ISP/Cloud. What I see then is that it's more like "What can this CPU do with the link" .. All the switches seems to have same degree of performance number ..   It just confused one of our remote tech's doing troubleshooting at some wireless installation .. Client: Slow, AP: seems fine, SWITCH: slow .. ???   Regards Thyge   ... View more

Whining .. Well indeed .. I seem to see that a lot in this specific line of posts ..   I too have my business with SMB customers, and I do not whine. I deliver Meraki stuff nearly daily right now.   I take the positive approach and engage with my Meraki persons. The DO provide and to me they are more than willing to help You out! My experience is that when You escallate exactly Your scenario, the Cisco system WILL help You out. Either by my methods above or by providing other means of solving the problem until stuff can arrive. We have ie used temporary devices (Z3C's ie) to provide connection until the right stuff arrives. I think I will stop answering Your posts, since they are somewhat lacking in the positive karma section and not receptive for other answers than "Lets give Meraki hell".     ... View more