hi rymiles,   it works! thank you very much!!! ... View more

Fix the LLDP on the MX250/450 issue.  2 years left on advanced security on 24 MX250/450.  2 Years on an open case and no result.   Clock is ticking.  Gotta start looking for a new solution! ... View more

The better question to ask is when will they ship.  🙂 ... View more

Thanks! Adding the IP to the content filter whitelist solved the issue. ... View more

Thank you! ... View more

Thanks the problem was I had mapped my port to the wrong vlan. ... View more

An easy way is go to Organization > Overview. Go to devices tab, you can filter on MX to parse the results, make sure Uplink IP port 1 (and 2 if you use them) are selected. That will show the public IP. You can export this into csv. ... View more

Dear @BrandonS thank you very much for the confirmation.   @Ryan_Miles thanks for the heads up, I'll consider the enterprise license.   Best Regards! ... View more

because another renewal claim was done after. the second renewal (ending is 2CF4) didn't include a MS225-48FP and therefore it got eliminated.   this looks like the wrong process was followed when claiming licenses. you'll need to open a support case and see if they can help fix your licensing. ... View more

Typically you don´t need to switch off on line to configure LACP. When using stacked switches with an aggregation from more than one of this stacked switches I had some issues, so I would preffer to switch off one of the lines in an stacked switch aggreagation case. I suggest to configure the aggregation first on the far switch and then on the near switch so you have an easier possibillity to reach the switches if something wents wrong. ... View more

Give this a look. It might deliver what you need.   https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/meraki_tools/11340767263 ... View more

Thank you adding in all of the SSIDs into the body worked for me. ... View more

It looks like there might be small bug in the MS 125 s/w. Sw1 should not be able to see SW2 as a direct client and not at an address 1.1.1.1. The reporting client list tends to change as I flip between the status pages. Also, I'd expect SW1 to see 3 virtual interfaces of the MX75.. one for 10.10.10.1, one for 10.10.20.1 and one for 10.10.30.1 .. and since I've allowed the native vlan, maybe one for 192.168.128.1..    I'm not sure if I should allow VLAN 1 on the list from the MX75.. I did it to allow management of the SWs from the native VLAN IP of the MX.    Operation seems fine, so I hesitate to change things as we are live 7 days a week. I've submitted this as a 'case' so someone can look to see if there might be a bug in the MS125 firmware. ... View more

To confirm on the static WAN IP's. They both show in the same subnet, but one has a /24 mask and the other a /29. Is that correct or is there a typo on the /24 one? ... View more

Thanks - thought it might be a long-shot ! ... View more

Yes, SPAN source and destination ports are in same physical switch. My explanation may not have been enough ... MS on right side is mirroring original packets to left using SPAN. MS on left side connects the server and MS on right side with the same VLAN.   server ---- MS(L2 transfer) ---- MS(SPAN-src/dest) ---- phone   In this situation, can SPANed data reach to server ? Or is it discarded by MS on left side ? * I think this is an improper use of MS, but I would like to know if it is technically possible. ... View more

Well spectrum tech swapped out the bridge modem with a modem/router, disabled SIP ALG and placed modem in Bridge mode and so far so good. I'll give it 24 hours and take my MX back. fingers crossed! ... View more

Hi Sawadogo,   It appears that the Cisco 500-551 exam has been retired and that the 500-560 exam has taken it's place. Best of luck with your studying and testing.   Kathleen ... View more

Do you know if it had a static IP on the WAN port? If so and you changed ISP's you will need to either reset it to use DHCP or a new static if this new provider is providing one.   You can set the WAN IP using the local status page of the MX https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Tools_and_Troubleshooting/Using_the_Cisco_Meraki_Device_Local_Status_Page#MX_Series_with_Single_Dedicated_WAN_Link ... View more

Basically I have two firewalls with different subnets behind these and I want to connect these two with a link using their lan ports because there are resources that needs to communicate with each other. I found it dificult to understand how meraki mx allows incoming traffic from fw1 on the right side of diagram. So I think I understand now that I need to create static routes and the traffic will be allowed to come in if we don’t have any other outbound rule denying the resources behind the MX to respond to the resources behind the fw1. There is only one rule the default one with allow any any.  ... View more

Note that the paid licence replaces the free licence (it does not add to it).  You will need 192 paid licences. ... View more

Just try 1Gbit port first. And see if you ever get near 1Gbit (you probably wont in normal office environments, you would need 160Mhz band or 80Mhz+a very special client device).   ... View more