Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About Thygesen
About Thygesen
Community Record
133
Posts
80
Kudos
3
Solutions
Badges
It's still on .. We see it on various switch models and software versions, included the recommended ones .. What we seem to conclude is, that most often it is yielded by workstations/docks or printers ..
... View more
Jan 25 2024
4:57 AM
So .. Basically we have nothing to show our compliance board in terms of CVE coverage and MX software/Meraki software ?
... View more
Jan 22 2024
3:11 AM
Hi Darren ! .. These are more directed towards other devices than the MX firewall itself ??
... View more
Jan 22 2024
3:10 AM
Hi Cmr 😀 Got that .. The concern I got was that the update rate of the MX firmware is not impressive, if the CVE resolution is done this way, if You compare to ie Firepower and other firewalls Hot-Fix services.. Seen with management eyes, they see the MX left "un-safe" longer than other firewalls .. Where do we have docu that shows that MX's are updated as quickly as all the other Cisco firewalls ?
... View more
Jan 22 2024
2:48 AM
Hi fellow MX'ers 😀 I got a question that left me somewhat puzzled .. Maybe You can enlighten me ? A lot of "other" firewall vendors boast about quick Zero Day patching and CVE mitigation .. Question: How do I ensure management that Meraki MX devices are as "up to date" as other vendors ? Some notification of security updates (like for Firepower) ? New version update notification mail ? Update method/CVE mitigation procedure for Meraki MX ? When I go through the MX firmware sections of the dashboard, I can't seem to find any good answers for the above .. Please assist 😁 Kudos' will rain upon You .. With Highest Regards Thyge
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
Dec 6 2023
8:26 AM
Hi Experts 😎 Scenario.. An organization running Meraki co-term is splitting up, deviding their HW in two sections, not alike. Ie: 6 MX100 in orgA, 2 in orgB, etc.. 1) How do I split the org without the effort of reconfig orgB, when HW moved out ? 2) How do I move the licenses ? 3) Will this split affect the termination date if ie. heavy licenses are not moved in equal shares ? With highest regards Thyge
... View more
Nov 24 2023
11:31 AM
Wow ! 😀 Thanx Alembrahao! That was a neat piece of code !! I will do a routine using that (and of course have Your credits in there) .. Maybe we some time in the future will get same tools for ports in every device ..
... View more
Nov 24 2023
4:13 AM
Hi Wizards 😁 I have a customer template based setup with ie. MX-65 as SDwan terminators.. When having AP's directly connected to the MX, we sometimes need to recyle the PoE port .. But .. when bound to the template, there is no access to the port configs / tools ? How do we go about doing that without restarting the whole device ?
... View more
May 17 2023
2:21 AM
🙂 Just for fun did a couple of tests on a private installation: Setup: ISP->SW1->SW2->AP (daisy-chained) Sw1: MS120-8FP: 18.2Mbps Sw2: MS120-8LP: 20.7Mbps AP: MR33: 428.4Mbps .. 🙂
... View more
Apr 5 2023
4:31 AM
💪That was a good tip! Especially if the PT100 probe reports in the same format as the sensor for MT11 and maybe even with the same physical interface ? Have You tested it (even though our friends here from Meraki does not recommend it) ?
... View more
Dec 12 2022
5:55 AM
Hi Larry .. Challenge: The probes only allows +55 Celcius as max .. Situation: If ie we were to monitor outlet from heating systems, boilers etc. reaching temperatures way over the limits of the provided probes .. And it would be a shame not to use these MT's since we deploy wall2wall Meraki ..
... View more
Dec 9 2022
1:25 AM
Hi All !! I know this is a sensitive subject.. But if I were (for some reason) to measure something OUTSIDE the limits of the probe(s) orderable with the MT11 (ie high temperatures or the like), is there a way to get specs to get a custom built sensor manufactored, that fits to the MT11 ?
... View more
Sep 21 2022
2:46 AM
2 Kudos
Hi All ! And Happy IT Professionals Day !! 😁 One of my greatest inspirations is Ib Hansen (https://www.linkedin.com/in/hansenib/) who helped me start up my CCIE Study back in the days .. Kept contact for nearly 20 years now .. Thanx !! And I will gladly share the prize (with some fluid content) with him 😋 And of course all You contributants here in the Meraki Community !! / Thyge
... View more
Hi 🙂 Docks: It is a merry mix of Lenovo and Dell dockings with different firmware.. Switches: 14.33.1
... View more
@sas-brockett @Anonymous Well .. we see it A LOT also.. and I was hoping, that people would share any info/experience they have had (ie with Support cases) or any remedy to help .. We have feeling that ports serving ie phones or in-device-switching/porting like dock's tend to do this, but would like to hear other oppinions
... View more
Apr 27 2022
6:12 AM
That makes some sort of reason 😀. We were just confused since the numbers made no sense, when we looked on the topology ..
... View more
Apr 27 2022
5:41 AM
😀I see that, and why .. What I don't get is: What is the intention with the tool then ? If it is a CPU dependent measure, it could be a % then .. ? My expectation was not a WAN performance tool, but a management/Meraki cloud control meter .. Regards Thyge
... View more
Apr 27 2022
5:37 AM
🙂 Agree 🙂 I think I need to understand what the tool is meant for .. I thought it was something like: What is the box experiencing of link expectation/performance from the ISP/Cloud. What I see then is that it's more like "What can this CPU do with the link" .. All the switches seems to have same degree of performance number .. It just confused one of our remote tech's doing troubleshooting at some wireless installation .. Client: Slow, AP: seems fine, SWITCH: slow .. ??? Regards Thyge
... View more
Apr 27 2022
5:12 AM
1 Kudo
Hi ! I seem to run into very different results using the "Dashboard Throughput" tool depending on the device type.. Setup: ISP -> Switch1 -> Switch2 Switch1-> AP1 Switch1-> MX1 ISP: 1G up/downlink So: Switch1 (120-8FP) says: 20.1 Mbit Switch2 (120-8LP) says: 19.9 Mbit AP1 (MR33) says: 433.9 Mbit MX1 (MX64) says: 308.4 Mbit The same pattern is seen with other installations as well .. How come, and if that's life, then what should I expect from these devices ? Lotz of regards Thyge
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
Apr 13 2022
12:16 AM
1 Kudo
Whining .. Well indeed .. I seem to see that a lot in this specific line of posts .. I too have my business with SMB customers, and I do not whine. I deliver Meraki stuff nearly daily right now. I take the positive approach and engage with my Meraki persons. The DO provide and to me they are more than willing to help You out! My experience is that when You escallate exactly Your scenario, the Cisco system WILL help You out. Either by my methods above or by providing other means of solving the problem until stuff can arrive. We have ie used temporary devices (Z3C's ie) to provide connection until the right stuff arrives. I think I will stop answering Your posts, since they are somewhat lacking in the positive karma section and not receptive for other answers than "Lets give Meraki hell".
... View more
Apr 12 2022
3:39 AM
@OS-Cubed I guess so .. But in the same question, You migh ask Yourself where Cisco Meraki should aquire the parts for building Your orders ? We use the opportunity to upsell and use the more advanced available equipment, and strike a good deal with Cisco about the diff. I think now is a perfect time to do great deals with Cisco, since they also are very concerned about delivery to their loyal customers and partners. The delivery situation is equally hard for our friends from other venders, so I feel more obligated to loyalty and to be present at our customer locations, to clarify why things are as they are. If Your lost customers has any production with any 3rd party components, they surely understand the situation. Why not use the opportunity to extend and strengthen the connection with Your Cisco persons ?
... View more
@cmrGood point with the radios. When split, there will only be competition on the 2.4Ghz, if we so choose. The SSID is deployed across multiple subnets / areas of the campus. So .. in fact: 2 options: Tune the power down/bitrate to avoid stickiness and lock ie the guest-net to 2.4Ghz.?
... View more
Mar 30 2022
1:30 AM
@cmrThose are good suggestions! The split also somewhat sounds good, but the number of clients on the greeting AP will remain the same ? It does not seem as it will affect the "Anchor" function .. As I read the doc's it means, that everybody will get the greeting AP / reception area as anchor, since that is the first encounter with the Wifi, and when leaving for the other parts of the campus, the anchor will stay ?
... View more
Mar 30 2022
1:00 AM
Hi all You sharp Meraki's 😁 I have been wondering .. (and that's always a good start) .. We have a customer with a one-entrance reception area/waiting lounge .. This means, that both guests and all employees enter through this area, and meets the customers Meraki wireless here first time. This ALSO means, that a -lot- of transit associations take place.. and sometimes client balancing takes occur. We also see that some anchor issues associated with this client behaviour, when employees scatter throughout the campus after entering the main entrance .. So: Is there a way to shorten the roaming / change behaviour for the AP located in the reception area to avoid issues for the staff working there, also of this AP ? What are Your experiences and pref's with this roaming thing ? Waiting on the edge of the chair .. Thyge
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Installation
-
Other
-
SSID
Mar 22 2022
2:13 AM
@cmr🙂 And the needles are not dropping off .. Presents have to be small though .. No room for gear and powertools ..
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 2693 | May 29 2020 5:12 AM | |
| 2790 | May 6 2020 11:27 PM | |
| 6984 | Jan 31 2020 12:20 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 1018 | |
| 5 | 37132 | |
| 4 | 17913 | |
| 4 | 19312 | |
| 4 | 3007 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
