Nothing is really technically different with the switch. The difference is the business models between Cisco Meraki and TP-Link. Meraki is "all or nothing". You either pay for the operation, software patches/updates, security, 24x7 support and hardware replacement warranty or you get nothing. If you didn't know or understand this when you purchased Meraki I can understand your frustration, but that is how it is. It is becoming a trend and others are moving this way too. The justification/explanation is usually along the lines of keeping enough recurring revenue for the business to operate successfully and continue to provide security patches, support and hardware replacement while giving the end customer a quality product, piece of mind and ongoing support. The converse would be TP-Link (or similar) that may have outdated software with known exploits that may never be patched and support that may not be available or responsive and no hardware replacement if it breaks. And maybe TP-Link can't sustain a business model with low margins and no recurring revenue so they go out of business or get sold to another company. I think there will always be a place for both business models, but more movement towards recurring revenue is definitely a current trend in industry.
... View more