Meraki

hechoinlmusd1

Rolling back to MR 30.6 did not help. Talked to Support and will be downgrading same two WLAN networks to version MR 29.7.1

Bovie2K

This was so helpful.

Fahfoofnik

This is what I mean. When I sync ADE, I search for the serial number of the iPad/iPhone. I find it; I select, click on Manage Profiles; I'm then shown a list where I can choose "Visible" or "All." I click on All, and I see all the enrollment profiles there...clicking on any of the 10 profiles, it would seem obvious to me that I would be offered a place to edit this specific profile I just clicked on, but there's no such option...I see what's below. At the bottom, there's an option to "Cancel" or just close that window. This is not helpful. I need to edit these fields in this profile and others. Where does one go to edit these?

BlakeRichardson

I have the same issue with two iPads that I enrolled today, assigned by is showing as -1. I am also having an issue that when I enroll a device it takes 15-20 minutes to appear in the device list.

WizIT

Congrats and Thanks.

Brash

My main question is: how did the attacker gain access to her system behind the NAT? If I obtain someone's public IP address and port, can I exploit their system? What methods might the intruder have used to compromise the machine? There are many opportunities that attackers can use. I've listed a few common ones below: - An attacker can hijack an existing insecure session to a compromised web service - An attacker can use tactics (usually social engineering) for the session to be started from the client side. This is usually social engineering or domain typo squatting etc. Because these tactics get the client to establish the session, NAT and inbound firewalls doesn't provide any benefit of security or obscurity.

Shinichi_K

Thank you for the additional information! I got it.

Pond

Keep me looped in, I might be able to help

BlakeRichardson

Sorry this is a bit of a read. I am not sure about systems manager for MacOS devices as I use it for iOS devices. I use Jamf to manage my MacOS devices. In saying that I had a user last year migrate their user account and system settings onto a personal device and that device was suddenly showing in my Jamf instance, I am assuming the same would happen with systems manager. Unlike a true ADE enrolment though I was able to manually remove the MDM profile from that device. Also bear in mind with systems manager that you can only enrol up to the number of licenses you have, there is no grace period so you would need to have spare licenses if you plan on the old and new hardware running in parallel for a brief period. A grace period on SM licenses is something I have asked for as replacing devices such as iPads it's nice to have them configured before removing to old units which means running devices in parallel for a short time.

Amit_pal

Done !!! Fingers Crossed 🤞

JGTS

Unfortunately, not yet. I've asked the question, but haven't been given a solution apart from continuously RMAing at the moment. I do have a number of other MX75s in the field that aren't affected by the same issue though, so it's very much a game of roulette at the moment.

rwiesmann

Thanks for the hint...did not get that....and i am not so familiar with systems manager..

oakarts

Did you find a solution? I seem to be having the same issue.

Imjin

Hi Did you ever get a resolution to this issue, We have MVs managed in a single network across several geographical sites all of the sites can export footage apart from one. same error message "Network connection from the camera was interrupted during video export. Check the camera's uplink connection, then try again."

BlakeRichardson

@CarolineS Thanks so much for this hopefully everyone finds it useful when it comes to selecting tags.

BlakeRichardson

What version of SonicOS are you running? I have setup S2S with Meraki and Sonicwalls in the past without any issue.

BlakeRichardson

Great to see Linux appearing more in the documentation.

PhilipDAth

I believe it was terminated in January 2025. You can't buy it anymore. I assume those with it can only use it until it expires.

P40

This is kind of what I was thinking. Thank you for the help!

TonyCummins

This is the exact thing Im experiencing, Brand new C9300L-48UXG switch stacks. Its a know issue according to support. Fixed in latest firmware 17.1.4 Issue related to the "container" crashing in the stack. Im planning on an upgrade later tonight to address my issue.

sinelnyyk

Hi @jsmith722, As it was mentioned by folks above, there is no native solution in Meraki to limit the amount of clients per AP, so in this case it will be always the client decision to which AP to connect. With this in mind, key to the correct client distribution between APs is wireless design. Here are a couple of KBs that can help you understand what settings can be used to control RF environment: https://documentation.meraki.com/Architectures_and_Best_Practices/Cisco_Meraki_Best_Practice_Design/Best_Practice_Design_-_MR_Wireless/High_Density_Wi-Fi_Deployments https://documentation.meraki.com/Architectures_and_Best_Practices/Meraki_Wireless_for_Enterprise_Best_Practices If you have a high density deployment, make sure to conduct post-deployment site survey to validate the RF environment.

ITHRODOT

Hello johndball, where can we get agents versions "1.0.98" & "3.0.2", please? we also have the same issue. No reation from support on our case since 2 days now. Best regards, Daniel

GreenMan

Every Meraki device is managed by the Meraki Dashboard. What I think you're getting at though; the built-in wireless of an MX64W (the W bit) is separate from the wireless provided by any MR Access Points. Even if you place the MX and the APs in the same Network, the setups are configured via different menus and will not interact with each other. You could, for example, configure an SSID on the MX (via Security & SD-WAN menu) and an SSID with the same name on the APs (via Wireless menu) but the APs and the MX would not co-ordinate channel and power settings (AutoRF), nor would a client device roam seamlessly between the MX and the APs. It should be noted too that the WiFI capabilities of the MX6xW are significantly less sophisticated than any of the dedicated APs shipped in the last half-dozen years.

shev_

How can you revoke DHCP leases in a meraki environment?

GreenMan

I'm not in PM but my take would be; IPv4 requires NAT - there aren't enough addresses to give each device its own public address. IPv6 was designed to allow every device it's own address, so no NAT required.

About BlakeRichardson

BlakeRichardson

Community Record

Badges