Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
About Bovie2K
Bovie2K
Getting noticed
Member since Oct 7, 2017
19 hours ago
Community Record
54
Posts
54
Kudos
1
Solution
Badges
Tuesday
3 Kudos
Meraki just fixed for me this morning. I'm waiting for the root cause but they said they did something on the back end and now it works.
... View more
Monday
1 Kudo
Ok I think we know what is going on. When you make a config update the switch goes through some back end tests before downloading the config. One of those tests is a RSTP / MSTP test and thats failing. That explains why we are seeing an RSTP reload in the logs and it's not downloading the config. Support thinks we are effected by a bug and they are looking into it.
... View more
a week ago
2 Kudos
@cmr ya I get it. Normally I always run stable but like I said I was trying to diagnose an 802.1x issue and knowing this is where Meraki was going I figured it better to make the switch and see if it worked. The firmware seemed stable so we made the swap. I did read the release notes but of course didnt remember the sticky Mac if that is the cause I would agree it's too risky to leave something to memory where the GUI doesn't stop you. I'll call support in the morning and see if they can fix and will report back so we all can learn.
... View more
a week ago
2 Kudos
This could have started when I used sticky Mac. I see it's not supported by IOS-XE even though I've removed the sticky Mac config I still have the same problem. not sure why the GUI lets you configure sticky Mac.
... View more
a week ago
Also seeing this error now in the error log CRIMSON 3 DATABASE_MEMLEAK Database memory leak detected in /tmp/rp/tdldb/0/IOS_EVENTQ_DB database, queue_syslog_events_msg_record/syslog_events/queue_record size:120 byte, callsite:
... View more
a week ago
Thanks for the info. We're using 802.1x with NPS and just can't get it to work. Still diagnosing with support. As for the config issue unfortunately support doesn't have anyone that knows IOS-XE that works over the weekend. We were told to call back Monday. So the downgrade is out of the options as well. Do you know if the factory reset is the same as it is with the MS? It will wipe it then connect to the cloud and redownload the new config?
... View more
a week ago
We have two Cisco 9300L's in a stack that we had all configured and were working fine. Then we put them into production and now when we update port configuration it's not actually updating on the switch. VLAN's are staying the same. We can confirm this by going into the terminal and doing a show running-config interface te1/0/39 for port 39 and it shows the old config on the port. They were updating fine before we did the move. The VLAN config is the main thing but we also noticed if were turn off POE and disable the port completely it doesn't update the config the port says working. The other problem we are having and we are trying to track down is every time we make a config change the stack is doing an RSTP update and dropping all traffic for 10 to 15 seconds which I'm not sure is related or not. We can see the RSTP updates in the logs. We went with IOS XE 17.15.2 because its the future and also the CS firmware had broken 802.1x in it. Turns out it's also broken for us in IOS XE but we haven't been able to solve with support yet. the 802.1x config works fine with the MS firmware for the Meraki style switches.
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Interfaces
Feb 13 2025
11:17 AM
yes running latest IOS XE firmware now and its not even sending a radius request anymore. They escalated my case. Will keep updated here.
... View more
Feb 13 2025
10:19 AM
More information. Working with Meraki support the IOS XE firmware doesn't even seem to be sending radius request. Super odd. Same question anyone running C9300's with NPS?
... View more
Feb 13 2025
9:41 AM
Hello, I've got some new C9300L's but am having a hard time with 802.1x Windows Network Policy Server. It works great with our MS series switches but cannot get it working with the C9300's. First I figured out it's not using Ethernet as a NAS port type it's using Async (Modem). Second it won't accept PEAP and MS-CHAPv2. It will only accept PAP, SNAP which is no encryption. That will get the NPS logs to show an accept on the request but Meraki still shows a deny when testing radius. Does anyone have the new C9300's 802.1x working with NPS? Note I have the same experiencing the same issue with both MS firmware and the new IOS XE public beta.
... View more
Apr 1 2020
9:29 AM
3 Kudos
Meraki Team, Please show this thread to management. IPv6, IKEv2 and Anyconnect for client VPN are HUGE missing features. You see many customers a jumping ship because they have no choice they are complaining because they WANT to continue to use the product but can't. We know you are working on it but we as customers need/deserve a roadmap and timeline of when these features will be live so we can plan accordingly. Please no more an update in x months.
... View more
Sep 9 2019
5:48 PM
I have to say I about died laughing when Meraki had the Podcast last weekend on IPv6 and pretty much none of the hardware supports it. The podcast also made it sound like things were coming quickly. Fingers Crossed for the September update. @Meraki-PM-TeamPLEASE BEG management for them to allow you to share more. We all love Meraki hardware its just getting harder and harder to recommend with this glaring hole. Some of the other major firewall stuff we know is coming like ikev2 and objects.
... View more
Oct 18 2018
9:23 AM
3 Kudos
@Daghan Thanks for the update. Please pass to management the need for an active road map for MX like IPv6, IKEv2, Anyconnect support, network objects and groups (Love that you mentioned this one) and finally Site-to-site inbound firewall (which even shows up on the dashboard). Eagerly awaiting all these features.
... View more
Oct 17 2018
4:32 PM
2 Kudos
I was told the hardware supports IPv6 but there are some current software packages they need to replace before they can support it.
... View more
Sep 6 2018
2:01 PM
2 Kudos
@davidvan Thanks for the post. I understand you are limited on what can be said but I think this forum thread is enough to take back to management to show there is a real NEED and WANT for full IPv6 and NAT64 support from MX. Like I said in an earlier post it wouldn't please everyone but even a middle ground of the phone home still using IPv4 but the MX's at least having NAT64 support would be great in the nearer term. Also not knowing is the worst. We don't know if its two years away or two months away. Some statement at all would be helpful. Thanks
... View more
Aug 22 2018
9:05 AM
4 Kudos
Its not just that they don't have IPv6 its the total radio silence. Not even a we are working on it and expect it by Q whatever 18 or 19. Even if they added it as supportable but still needed IPv4 in the short term to phone home that would be preferable to no IPv6 support period. I would also echo the other comments in this thread that Meraki employees quit calling it a feature. When everyone else supports its no longer a feature its a basic requirement.
... View more
May 10 2018
10:27 AM
1 Kudo
@MerakiDave Could this be like a few years ago when the Z1 got accidentally artificially limited then later the cap was removed?
... View more
May 10 2018
10:25 AM
1 Kudo
This is frustrating both directions. The Z3 is more $$$ than the Z1 yet has less performance. Also limiting it to 100mb makes it a bad choice when many peoples home connections are 250mb or more down and a cheap router can do that speed as a business you give them a Z3 to take home and everything is slower. Yet on the other end I have an MX64 at home and why should a Z1 or Z3 out preform my MX64. Though I can see on Meraki's end why they don't want to impact on their more expensive products. Though still why not stop artificially limiting and just promise actual speeds like say Cisco does. They don't promise a 5506 will do gigabit but in the right situation it will.
... View more
Mar 20 2018
3:58 PM
Agreed stay with the MX100 and see what you get before upgrading. You may go right up to the Meraki limited speed on the MX100 and be happy with that.
... View more
Mar 20 2018
3:49 PM
2 Kudos
This happened with the Z1's a few years back where they artificially limited it and then unlimited it. I understand the reason for limiting to protect your business on larger firewalls but these Z1's and Z3's shouldn't be limited. Though with that being said I'd love if they pulled the limit off the MX64.
... View more
Jan 11 2018
11:27 AM
2 Kudos
@MRCUR Agreed. I heard MS's are getting IPv6 Routing and MR's already have some support its time for MX's to get full IPv6 support. Especially when cheap consumer routers are getting it. I totally understand providing use cases to justify some feature requests but @MRCUR hits the nail with this one the use case is getting the support.
... View more
Nov 26 2017
2:16 PM
What actual Throughput are Z3 users getting? Also is the Z3 like the Z1 where you get as much throughput as the device will give usually much more than the specs say or like an MX where its locked to a software maximum?
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 195 | Wednesday |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | 113942 | |
| 4 | 171637 | |
| 3 | 298 | |
| 3 | 46509 | |
| 3 | 114896 |
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
