Register or Sign in
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About Aaron_Wilson
Aaron_Wilson
A model citizen
Member since Oct 10, 2017
Wednesday
Community Record
216
Posts
100
Kudos
7
Solutions
Badges
09-08-2021
11:53 AM
2 Kudos
And now some alignment issues. Yikes!
... View more
09-08-2021
11:51 AM
Appears to be less of an issue on my Mac. Maybe it is something to do with Windows/hDPI displays???
... View more
09-08-2021
11:48 AM
Woah, anyone else just see the font change on the dashboard? Not sure I'm digging the thin font, its a little harder to read on my screen.
... View more
09-07-2021
07:01 PM
Regarding #2, it's all or nothing by device type within a network. For example, you must upgrade all access points. You can choose to stagger them to cause minimal interruption, or concurrent upgrades in order to get it done faster.
... View more
09-07-2021
05:19 PM
Ok, that took a few reads to process. Almost seems like it would have been better to specify the vlan for the failed scenarios, rather than the configured/un configured options defining what "guest", etc, means.
... View more
09-07-2021
04:49 PM
Certainly newer. I don't recall them a couple months ago. Also, would be curious about a detailed if/then scenario for guest vlan vs failed auth vlan. With the access policy I did, failing auth dumped the port to guest vlan.
... View more
09-03-2021
12:56 PM
3 Kudos
The graphs are good, just keep in mind the average changes based on date range. The shorter the time frame, the more granular the average, so numbers will appear higher. Longer the time range, averages are spread out, things flatten more. The analytics screen under the Network me is also a good spot to look. It is not realtime, but gives you a sense of what has occurred, when spikes happened, and what apps contributed to the spikes.
... View more
09-03-2021
12:38 PM
1 Kudo
This thread is regarding the vague email Meraki issued about AMP/TG being enabled and needing to update firmware for continued use. The OP requested that next time Meraki might tell us which org(s)/network(s) triggered such an email. 🙂
... View more
09-03-2021
12:16 PM
O_o That doesn't tell you where AMP is enabled...
... View more
09-03-2021
12:06 PM
Ditto. I don't even know where to begin to look.
... View more
09-02-2021
07:47 AM
If they are using WPA2/3 passwords, that great. Hiding SSID and MAC filtering is mostly to keep away the non-tech people who likely do not pose a threat to begin with. Good to hear passwords are being used.
... View more
09-01-2021
07:32 PM
What Blake said. For wireless you really want to avoid any MAC based filtering/access. You can see the MAC for any wireless device, as because of this anyone could spoof and gain immediate access to the network.
... View more
09-01-2021
04:53 PM
1 Kudo
Yea, I'm not digging it. There seems to be to rhyme or reason for the warning. Fox example, if 15.44.3 is stable, and 15.45.0 is RC, there is zero reason for 15.44.3 to be showing a warning.
... View more
08-23-2021
03:09 PM
That's what I would try first, booting it isolated to see if it's handing out IPs with no up/downlonks.
... View more
08-14-2021
06:14 AM
Ah, I see now. I guess the confusing part was I updated from an older former stable version which was displaying the warning to the current stable release. After the update it still showed a warning. I would have expected the system to not let me update to a version which too also had the warning.
... View more
08-14-2021
05:43 AM
This is interesting. I am receiving a warning about some devices which are running the current stable code. Anyone know if there was a recent change in the logic when prompting about this? I would not have expected a RC or beta release to give me a warning.
... View more
08-12-2021
05:10 PM
I know Meraki is fairly tight lipped on roadmap items. I'm curious if anyone has seen any discussions about nested templates. What I mean by that is a network which is not bound by a template, instead a sub section is. For example, I have the need to have the MX and MS be non-template based, but would desire the wireless to be template drive. I want all of the devices (MX/MS/MR) to be part of a single network. The advantage to this is I can make wireless changes across the board in one fell swoop, while at the same time the wireless is part of the network and status screens. An alternative idea is bulk changes which can be applied across multiple networks for a given value. For example, if I want to update the radius servers for all (or some) networks do this via a few GUI clicks. Anyone who uses Cisco's Control Hub for their collaboration devices knows what I mean. I love templates for the home user setups, but they are not great for the corporate setup. They make total sense for retail, hospitality, etc.
... View more
08-11-2021
05:04 PM
1 Kudo
NHRT would only help solve Windows DNS stuff. I agree, it would be great for Meraki to add DNS intercept/redirect.
... View more
08-05-2021
06:29 PM
Thanks both. It's all making sense now. The mental block I was having was in the Meraki examples of a switch stack, but that was a layer 2 stack, not a layer 3 stack. Ok, so if I run MX 1 to swx1 and swx2, spanning tree on the Cisco switch will shut the swx2 port. And if swx1 fails swx2 will go to forwarding?
... View more
08-04-2021
06:07 PM
Ok, having a mental block for correct wiring. Here is the lay of the land: -Dual MX67 for VPN back to mothership -Cisco 9300 switch stack running layer 3 for the branch location (/24) -Primary MX connects to SWX 1 -Warm spare MX connects to SWX 2 Over the years I know the Meraki design preference has shifted away from direct link between each Meraki for VRRP, but I'm seeing issues since the MX's do not participate in spanning tree. Here is the diagram I modified from Willette's picture for what I believe to be correct. If I have layer 3 hand-off from MX to switch stack, and the switch stack is running layer 3 for local LANs, is it OK to do direct MX to MX VRRP connection? If so, uplinks between MX and switch stack is ok to be access? One MX going to SWX 1, while warm spare goes to SWX 2? If SWX 1 fails will warm spare MX pass the traffic? Or do I need to trunk VLAN 100 between the two MXs with VLAN 1111 being default?
... View more
08-02-2021
06:27 PM
Then throw the new alt mgmt interface option to cause even more confusion....but I'm loving the alt mgmt IP option!
... View more
08-02-2021
03:37 AM
I have seen the mismatch error stick around for a bit even when things are correct. Make sure it's just not a lag in updating the dashboard. Are you doing DHCP or static on the switch for the mgmt vlan IP?
... View more
04-13-2021
05:48 PM
I echo pretty much what everyone has said. And like recently said, make sure you have the right VLAN set on the Meraki switch config even if DHCP. And welcome to the Meraki world. Just wait until you plug in an AP with no network access, it discovers a near by open SSID, joins it, and access the internet this way! It's pretty freaky.....
... View more
My Accepted Solutions
| Subject | Views | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 1197 | 03-06-2021 09:13 AM | |
| 510 | 09-16-2020 03:41 AM | |
| 1192 | 12-02-2019 02:49 PM | |
| 1694 | 10-31-2019 05:36 PM | |
| 905 | 10-04-2019 10:39 AM | |
| 11757 | 03-01-2019 02:21 PM | |
| 1731 | 01-08-2019 03:51 AM |
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | 1197 | |
| 5 | 1694 | |
| 4 | 1731 | |
| 3 | 313 | |
| 3 | 905 |
