Hi @Cobi,   Unfortunately, this is not a supported feature at this time.   Although this feature is not available, we take our customer feedback seriously. We would like to encourage you to use the Meraki dashboard to give your feedback. You can do that at the bottom of any dashboard page. Any feature request/feedback sent sends an email to our Product Managers and Development Teams. These requests are considered and used to help shape our product roadmaps. The most wished-for items are incorporated into product development.  ... View more

This feature is not 100% reliable.  Sometimes, it can take a while before Meraki can recognise what kind of client it is (so they may be allowed access for 10 minutes and then blocked). ... View more

@Crocker Our team is conducting a thorough investigation and a robust review to ensure an accurate and comprehensive analysis. This process may take some time to complete.   If you have a support case please try to request the RCA on the case, if you do not have a case already logged, pelase try to log one by going to to the dashboard? > Get help and cases. ... View more

Yes , they should both be visible while doing a packet capture on the internet interface? ... View more

Thanks Again, please ignore my request. i found the minimum license requirement document.   Thanks A alot again, your feedback was really helpful. ... View more

Hi @mr_mahoney,   I do not believe this can be changed on the dashboard as the access point will use the User-Agent string field of an HTTP GET request packet to determine the operating system of the client when it first associates, and allow or deny access accordingly.   Some clients may misidentify themselves when specifying the User-Agent string field of an HTTP GET request.   Device type policy enforcement is done on a best-effort basis, dependent upon the information that the client provides. When needing to enforce security-focused policies based on device type, please leverage solutions such as Meraki Systems Manager, or Cisco ISE.    Please take a look at this KB for your reference.   ... View more

Thank you so much. ... View more

It can be deceiving that the stacking ports of an MS switch are in fact QSFP+ ports.  But I believe the software will not allow a link to form.  Correct me if someone has actually tried that with succes. ... View more

@TomasB, If you found this post helpful, please give it kudos. If my answer solved your problem, click "accept as solution" so that others can benefit from it. ... View more

Hi AnM,   Thanks for trying that, I know that we have a known issue on our side where SAML sensor user roles for all networks and all sensors can't see the sensor list, as far as I know that should not affect normal dashboard users, you also mentioned that you are not using SAML.   I would suggest logging a case with our support team to look deeper into this for you.   - Please include the name and Email address of the affected users in the case.   - Also,please uplod the HAR capture file when one of the users is trying to view the sensors list.   Please take a look at this article for your reference on how to get the HAR capture.   BR ... View more

If I were to reset it to factory settings, would there be a chance that this issue would occur again? Is there a permanent solution or a fix version of the OS being released? I've looked into various options but the only method I can find is to reset it to factory settings. ... View more

If you already have an MX template and you want to bind the MX network only to that template, you will need to split the current network so it will become three networks, MX,MS,MR netwroks as explained in this article then you can bind that MX only network to the template you already have.   Please take a look at MX Templates Best Practices for your refernce.     ... View more

https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/MX95-running-MX-18-208-Problem-changing-single-WAN1-Uplink-speed/m-p/244142#M54636 ... View more