Meraki

RWelch · ‎May 30 2024

RWelch · ‎Mar 21 2024

@Bucket Well said....thank you. I concur and appreciate the input/feedback.

RWelch · ‎Mar 21 2024

New hardware MX105 MS425-16 MS250-24 MS225-48 (2) MS225-48FP (3) MS120-8FP MR46 (4)

RWelch · ‎Mar 20 2024

Dashboard is back up for me now.

RWelch · ‎Mar 20 2024

Same result (down) - 502 bad gateway.

RWelch · ‎Mar 16 2024

@MRCUR Not completely....I've settled for running the following: Running 18.107.9 on: One MX65W Two MX95 One MX105 Running 18.208.0.1 on One MX68W Six MX75

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

I've read through the SecurePort docs and feel with ALLOWED VLANs to ALL after enabling the SecurePort configuration...it's less secure than if pruning the VLANs to which you are serving (example below being VLANs 19-Management, 75-staff, 85-guests). I get the certificate part....from the perspective of wanting to separate wireless and wired devices. Is there additional broadcast if ALL VLANs are allowed?

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

@Ryan_Miles thanks for looking into it - for now I'll stick with 18.107.9 at least for this MX. Appreciate everyone's feedback.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

@Ryan_Miles it's always been set from the dashboard (as far as I can remember).

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

And to test it - I did go back to 18.208.1. Still won't allow me to change WAN1 ISP speed.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

I'm wondering if it's because I have a MX95 VPN concentrator behind this particular MX95?

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

@Ryan_Miles I have 11 total MX appliances in 4 organizations....that lone MX95 was the only one that I had any issues or problems with changing the WAN speed. All are running 18.208 except for my MX105.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

@Ryan_Miles Thank you - will do (if I go back to 18.208).

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

Thanks @PhilipDAth I decided to go back to 18.107.9 instead.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

I get the same error whether adjusting via slider or manual entry.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

It won't accept any changes regardless of what speed I set it to because WAN3 has NOT been configured.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

@ww Copper ethernet WAN1 is the single ISP connection that I attempted to adjust the bandwidth. It doesn't accept any change until such time that WAN3 has been configured.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

Agree. Perhaps in documentation somewhere it should include that one should enable WAN3 in order to be able to configure upload/download on WAN1 or 2. At the present time, I have a downlink on this particular port at a remote site which presents a problem.

RWelch · ‎Mar 13 2024

Is there a requirement to enable the BACKUP WAN and configure this unused WAN in order to change the WAN1 ISP speed? Seems a bit odd that it won’t allow me to change the WAN1 configuration (upload/download) until such time that I configure the backup WAN that’s not being used. Thanks for any feedback you have to share.

RWelch · ‎Feb 15 2024

Any feedback on stable release candidate MX 18.208? I gave MX 18.207 a run before deciding it was too buggy for my liking. I am holding off on upgrading 11 MXs in production until it’s more stable. Thanks for any feedback you are willing to share.

RWelch · ‎Jan 9 2024

I just tried your suggestion and YES - they do now show. Interesting! Thank you.

RWelch · ‎Jan 9 2024

Yes - it only shows default wan routes. My pic above was in response to how big routing table would (should) be for the largest org out of the 9 networks.

RWelch · ‎Jan 9 2024

I've tried 3 different browsers. 9 networks and none show route tables.

RWelch · ‎Jan 9 2024

Anyone else having problems getting the route table to display?

RWelch · ‎Oct 31 2023

DHCPv6 and RA guard is no longer listed under early access on my dashboard.

About RWelch

RWelch

Community Record

Badges