Meraki

javalins

It's probably not needed in my opinion, 2.5Gbps downstream from a single port from MG to MS130X won't be the bottleneck in this solution, it'll be the cellular network. I can see why link agg would be needed, but I don't see it as necessary to deliver a good experience.

jimmyt234

Yes - we have seen lots of MX75 devices plagued by 'panic reboots' which can have several underlying causes according to support. Get it RMA'd.

CarolineS

Hi @ShoaibAbbad - that’s great news! I’m going to mark your reply as the solution. (You can un-mark it if needed). Cheers!

RWelch

Can't hurt to submit feedback again since it's been 4-5 years, nothing has changed. Give your feedback (previously Make a Wish)

RWelch

The default 192 subnet is likely the native vlan (set trunk downlink to ms120 as that vlan) and in the allowed vlans on the downlink allow both the native vlan and client vlan.

JustinH

For beginners, there is a Getting Started with Cisco Meraki webinar scheduled for Thursday 12/12 at 9:00am PST.

AxL1971

I would say about 20 metres apart

CarolineS

Thanks for posting, and absolutely no worries! Glad the community could help.

jarrioja

Thank you very much for the response, at the time things happened I checked the DHCP and the firewall and they were working fine, all the IPs are fixed, it was as if the service was degraded, as if the access points were not receiving enough power, because the switch was green but the access points were not

Inderdeep

congratulations all Top shots .. we done @PaulF

BananaCO

I've encountered a similar issue although its complicated slightly by some changes within my organisation. We had 20 Meraki AP's running perfectly happy across a large site. We've recently closed the site and kept two of the MR46's to use in our new much smaller office suite. I've now setup the two MR46's with cabling direct to a Cisco Catalyst 9200 switch and they were running without issue for a couple of weeks and then on November 19th (i think) they started to complain about the link speed. I've checked the cabling, reset the AP's, forced the speed on the port. Nothing seemed to fix it. I haven't been able to bounce the switch but I'll need to wait for an opportunity to do that.

BlakeRichardson

I get where you are coming from. An "unconfigured" tick box would be a simple solution.

RWelch

Documentation Digest: November 15th - November 21st Organization End Users link appears to be a bad redirect (not to any documentation).

PaulF

Further to the Learning Hub, as described above, there's also https://info.androidenterprise.training/ and https://it-training.apple.com/tutorials/apt-deployment/ and, lastly https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFwlU-gQMpUgRhoidGgUWwCfE2QTpqyoF (MerakiMinute SM playlist)

cmr

It's definitely a new feature as the documentation is from 1st November and it requires firmware 19.1.4 or later. Looks very useful! Thanks @RWelch and @Holli69 for bringing it to my attention.

CarolineS

That's great news! I wish I could say that I worked some magic and fixed it.... but I didn't do anything. Magic! 🪄

M_I_D

! have 4 SSIDs VLAN 2080,2090,2096,2108 VLAN 2099 is for a security check- NAC Vlan 2020 management VLAN for AP

RWelch

Incoming customer wishes are automatically emailed to every engineer on our development team and also put on display in our engineering area, ensuring that we are always thinking about our customers’ requests as we move forward.

amabt

Please make use of all that spaces and step back on having too much wasted white spaces that can show useful info. For me seems all the re-designed pages shows less info than before. We want more info to be shown not less. Most of the graphics / icons looks fine to me. Please spend more time on showing more useful info rather than tweak the icons. If you guys want to play with graphics please look into dark mode for the Dashboard!

double_virgule

We're rolling out a bunch of the Wifi 6 APs, so not likely to bump up to Wifi 7 anytime soon. We tend to run about 2-3 years behind the newest standard as we don't need fast speeds. I do worry about the constant build toward faster and faster speeds. Most of our apps are built to work at sub 15 Mbps speeds for our rural locations on satellite internet or other low-speed connections.

TechMeister

We are seeing the same "AP unable to handle additional clients" with some of our wireless clients, and we do have APs closer than necessary. It looks like this is addressed in Firmware 31.1.1, with the stable release candidate currently being 31.1.5.1. Has anyone tried the 31.1.X firmware versions?

ww

I dont see it in the documentation (anymore?)

RaphaelL

This was also added to the change log : Added support for Catalyst and Meraki SD-WAN fabric Interconnect

AaronS

"Fixed an issue that caused switch stacks to learn MAC addresses from ports in the STP blocking state, triggering MAC flap messages in the event log" I've been waiting so long for this fix. Kind of minor all things considered, but it will be really nice not having to see all those events.

AhmedBadawy

Yes

About RWelch

RWelch

Community Record

Badges