Meraki

SoCalRacer · ‎Jun 26 2019

Also to note it works on iOS/Chrome OS/tvOS Although independent of the other Meraki solutions it can integrate with them well.

BrechtSchamp · ‎Jun 25 2019

It does have value. I'm with @SoCalRacer on this. Remove it from your organization inventory and then perform the factory reset. Then it can be used again by someone else who has or wants to buy a license. There are indeed programs for non-profits and charities, but the local Meraki sales rep would be able to help there.

meraki2champion · ‎Jun 25 2019

yes thanks alot

romualdt · ‎Jun 24 2019

Thanks everyone for their ideas. I was able to get the info I needed using the API and node red. I created a flow that returns all the networks then from there is lists every device that has connected in the last 30 days to a csv file.

PhilipDAth · ‎Jun 23 2019

>If a non-registered MAC address is connected to the wireless LAN, the system's ARP attack will degrade the response. If you could disable proxy-arp then it would make doing an attack easier. A client could simply send lots of ARP queries causing a massive broadcast flood completely using up the RF spectrum.

SoCalRacer · ‎Jun 20 2019

The API does not support directly exporting the video. The link it sends is for authenticated users only, hence why it sends you to the dashboard. You could use the share link, but you would need to hardcode user credentials into the script to access it. I think it is going to be more complicated than its worth. That being said you can export the video from the dashboard to a mp4 video file. https://documentation.meraki.com/MV/Processing_Video/Sharing_Video

SoCalRacer · ‎Jun 20 2019

I assume these issues are on the same SSID? I would check the SSID config, make sure it is in bridge mode. I am thinking the Sonicwall might be configured to allow for the LAN subnet and not the Meraki DHCP subnet that is NATd. Another option is to create a new SSID for testing, remove any restrictions and check the results.

StuKoalaIT · ‎Jun 20 2019

Just realised those particular clients had a different Router IP, oops.

SCC · ‎Jun 19 2019

Thank You. This is great.

Tung · ‎Jun 19 2019

There are two ways you can do with Meraki 1. 2 SSID with 2 Vlan (1 Vlan for Public, 1 Vlan for Private). 2. Meraki also have Nat mode for SSID, If you use Nat mode the client traffic only go to the gateway and can't connect back to local.

SoCalRacer · ‎Jun 19 2019

If you need LTE capabilitiy then Z3C If you don't need LTE capability then Z3 If you do need content filtering then MX64 From a sizing perspective Z3 is the right choice, but if you need advanced license feature then MX is the recommended option. Either way I don't see a specific reason why you need Meraki, you may look into other vendors to keep the cost down.

David_Boyle · ‎Jun 18 2019

Thanks for the reply. So I do currently have the main network on Bridge mode and Guest network on NAT mode. Do you have any documentation on how the second part of your reply is done?

PhilipDAth · ‎Jun 17 2019

I also can access http and https on 194.70.89.182.

PhilipDAth · ‎Jun 17 2019

DES and 3DES don't work so good in Meraki MX. Are you using AES encryption algorithyms?

Nash · ‎Jun 17 2019

RADIUS via NPS uses the customer's Active Directory accounts. I've used this with a couple dozen clients now. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Client_VPN/Configuring_RADIUS_Authentication_with_Client_VPN

rhbirkelund · ‎Jun 15 2019

@Marcel wrote: I'm a bit jeaous as don't have one yet, but it should go in this order: Gig->mGig - 10G -40G So for your MS355-48X2 it should be 1-24 1G 25-48 mGig 49-52 10G 53-54 40G Awesome, that is also my suspicion @Marcel. Thank you, and @PhilipDAth aswell. 🙂 It wasn't to much the switch specs, but more, which ports are GbE and which are MGig. Then I can make sure the technician onsite cables things correctly. 🙂

AjitKumar · ‎Jun 14 2019

Hi, Meraki switches use LACP to provide Layer 2 link aggregation. You may refer to the following Url. https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Tools_and_Troubleshooting/Link_Aggregation_and_Load_Balancing

SoCalRacer · ‎Jun 10 2019

Create 3 networks. Default, Production, and Testing(Beta). Change the settings in the networks accordingly, that way Default has no changes. Production has your confirmed good working changes, and Testing is the ones you are working on.

AjitKumar · ‎Jun 6 2019

Hi, Is this what you are referring to? https://api.meraki.com/api_docs#return-the-inventory-for-an-organization

MeredithW · ‎May 29 2019

@TimBisel Caroline and me, of course! We high fived in real life instead..

AjitKumar · ‎May 29 2019

Hi, I understand @jdsilva has already highlighted the process for you however you may also refer to the following Url documenting the step by step process for "Assigning a Static IP Address" to Switches. https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Other_Topics/Assigning_a_Static_IP_Address

CharlesIsWorkin · ‎May 28 2019

This is from Meraki support. Some changes are support for: SU-MIMO and MU-MIMO support Up to 256 QAM on both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz bands Power consumption: 11W max (802.3af) WMM Access Categories with DSCP and 802.1p support

JorgeRJimenez · ‎Apr 26 2019

Thanks so much, i think the point of this its becouse i missundertand the concept, Meraki Warm Spare works only with two ISP at the same time, if i want to enable more then 3 or 4 ISP we need to use MX separate and its different for Meraki warm spare concept and recomendation.

Nick · ‎Apr 8 2019

The MX is the Security - SD WAN product. While the Z range is the teleworker / remote gateway device. You can see the specs and difference here

redsector · ‎Apr 8 2019

IP-address is not copied. You can change it later.

About AjitKumar

AjitKumar

Ajit

Community Record

Badges