About AjitKumar

AjitKumar

Hi Have you tried this? Create A NEW open SSID and try connecting to the same. If successful try enabling WPA on the SSID and try connecting. Incase the connection is successful. Try integrating Radius Server and then Try connecting. This might help you analyze the stage where the issue could be.

AjitKumar

Hi I believe the vMX100 have the similar capabilities as a physical MX appliance The following url on the Page No. 3 suggests upto 250 Max concurrent VPN tunnels. https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_mx_sizing_guide.pdf

AjitKumar

Hi I too have obseverved inconsistency in this topology for a client of mine. There after I have been using a direct connection. I never tried this topology again.

AjitKumar

Hi I believe you should have a direct connection between MXes.

AjitKumar

Hi Your screenshot is not visible.

AjitKumar

Hi Hope you have updated the firmware. If yes, are you able to ping the AP and the Gateway Device.

AjitKumar

Hi, This seems to be challenging/interesting. If you are referring to plugging a device (3G/4G supporting) into USB port of MX. I believe only supported devices and configuration are listed in the following url. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX-Z/Cellular/3G_-_4G_Cellular_Failover You may use a third party device (may be a router) which can convert 3G/4G to LAN and plug the same to into the WAN Port of MX (Incase you are looking forward to use 1 of your WAN Port) USB tethering I believe may not be possible with MXes.

AjitKumar

Hi By any chance are you referring to the following option

AjitKumar

Hi, I hope you have gone through the following KB. https://documentation.meraki.com/MV/Other_Topics/Restricting_Access_to_Cameras This displays the possible privileges.

AjitKumar

Hi, I understand this may not be possible as of now. One cannot customize the content filtering Block Message.

AjitKumar

Hi Similar devices in a single network update at the same time. Also I believe the firmware size is in MBs. However I shall reiterate the upgrade download is negligible. I have not experienced heavy downloads atleast for MRs.

AjitKumar

Hi I am afraid. This may not be possible as of now because firmware update works on the basis of per network not per device.

AjitKumar

Hi I understand each device will download the new firmware individually. However the size of firmare is negligible incase you are upgrading.

AjitKumar

Hi Stu You are right. PPPoE configuration is possible only from the local admin page as of now. Ideally you should be directly connected to MX over Ethernet to access the local admin page However this is accessible via LAN and WAN too.

AjitKumar

Hi Shamshad Hope you have referred the following Datasheet. https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_datasheet_sfp.pdf I do not see any compatibility challenges for the following accessories with MS 250 MA-SFP-1GB-SX MA-CBL-40G-3M You do not need to buy SFP modules for stacking. Number of stacking cables shall be equal to the number of switches you are planning to put in a stack. You may also refer to following url https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Stacking/Switch_Stacks

AjitKumar

Hi Luffy Is this the Topology you are trying to achieve. If yes I guess this should work.

AjitKumar

Hi Luffy How many internet links do you have? If you have 1 ISP? What is the IP pool?

AjitKumar

Hi Luffy Q1 The MXes in HA will require 2 different IP Addresses. Q2 Yes you need 3 IP Addresses from the same subnet.

AjitKumar · ‎05-17-2018

Hi, Certainly you can establish site to site VPN with MX 64. We have several customers with the similar setup. I guess the screen shot does not refer because "Recommended max clients" and Number of "VPN Tunnels" are same or may be a UI bug. You may refer to the 3rd page of sizing guide it seems like the updated one. . https://meraki.cisco.com/lib/pdf/meraki_whitepaper_mx_sizing_guide.pdf

AjitKumar · ‎05-16-2018

Hi, The logs reflect as if there are mismatched values of "Phase I" between devices. I hope the Phase I and Phase II settings are same at both the ends. You may also refer to following url (if not already) to troubleshoot this further. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX-Z/Site-to-site_VPN/Troubleshooting_Non-Meraki_Site-to-site_VPN_Peers

AjitKumar · ‎05-12-2018

Hi As Philip suggests "Cisco Meraki do not work with out License". However the solution is extremely awesome from the point of Analytics. It gives you in depth information about how the network is utilized. This information is very useful to define and decide What to be allowed? What to be blocked" Who should have more bandwidth? What applications and services to be allowed to users selectively and at what speed? To summarize the network utilization can be shaped so that the resources can be used for productive purposes. Incase you have budget challenges you may start with Enterprise license and upgrade to Advanced (However Advanced is recommended) Kindly find the following url to see the difference between the Enterprise and Advanced License. https://documentation.meraki.com/zGeneral_Administration/Licensing/Cisco_Meraki_Licensing_Guidelines_and_Limitations

AjitKumar · ‎05-11-2018

Hi I understand Cisco Meraki does not have any MX-82 Model as of now. The nearest I can think of is MX 84 which available for now. MX 84 is a security appliance (UTM). It offers various services like Web Caching, VPN Server, DHCP Server, VLANs, Content Filtering, L3 & L7 Firewall and many more.... The device can be configured with various features depending on your requirement or network topology. The following url gives us detailed information about the product https://meraki.cisco.com/products/appliances/mx84 You may also watch Fady's exclusive video on MXes available on Youtube to understand the function of Product. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCrVdn6BYNPPQSILwKY3hUqQ/videos All products of Cisco Meraki requires a cloud license to work. You may buy the same along with the Product or may be buy it separately.

AjitKumar · ‎04-23-2018

Hi Khurram Did you get a chance to go through the following Url https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/WiFi_Basics_and_Best_Practices/Approximating_Maximum_Clients_per_Access_Point It seems, Each access point has a technical limitation of 128 clients maximum per radio. Please note that this is only a theoretical maximum; in practice, interference caused by multiple clients communicating simultaneously will cause this limit to be far lower.

AjitKumar · ‎04-13-2018

Hi Following is an excerpt from https://meraki.cisco.com/support/#policies:eol Hope this may clarify some of your queries. Although legacy Cisco Meraki products typically can connect to our cloud-based management software for the entire useful life of the product, following the EOST Date, some things may change, including the following: Cisco Meraki cannot guarantee that legacy hardware products will be able to connect to the management software indefinitely following the EOST Date; Cisco Meraki Technical Support may no longer troubleshoot the legacy hardware products; Cisco Meraki may no longer issue firmware updates or patches for the legacy products; and New software features available for the management software may not be compatible with the legacy hardware functionality or with the firmware running on the legacy hardware. If either of the first two situations above occurs, then we will use our best efforts to provide the customer with a workable solution for upgrading from the legacy hardware and, failing that, will credit the value of any remaining license time attributable to the legacy hardware to the customer’s Dashboard organization on a prorated basis.

AjitKumar · ‎04-11-2018

Hi Richard I believe ACLs in switches work little differently as compared to MX. Did you get a chance to look at the following url https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Other_Topics/Switch_ACL_Operation

AjitKumar

Community Record

Badges