About AjitKumar

AjitKumar · ‎08-18-2021

@hollowpoints Both MX and MS are independent product and they do support RADIUS. Hence I do not see any challenge. I understand your design should be good to go.

AjitKumar · ‎07-27-2021

Hi @merakifr Meraki Switches offer following Licensing Types Enterprise (https://meraki.cisco.com/product/switches/switches-licenses/switches-enterprise-license/ available for all switches Advanced (https://meraki.cisco.com/product/switches/switches-licenses/switches-advanced-license/) only for MS390 Model There is no per feature Licensing in Meraki. You get all the features with the license.The L2/L3 features available for the specific model will be enabled with Enterprise License. Hope this answers your query.

AjitKumar · ‎07-16-2021

Hi @Marsrock2021 , May be we can use the idea of filtering the VLAN at the switch port page (there are various parameter) Switch -> Switch Ports

AjitKumar · ‎07-16-2021

Hi @Yasiru_SE, As you know PDL (Per Device Licensing) come with more flexibility of What to renew, Moving Licenses between Orgs. etc. You may have refereed the following link too https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Licensing/Meraki_Licensing We see PDL as advantage however a few short comings may be 1. PDL cannot be reverted 2. Administration and Management (Keep track of expiry) otherwise migration process is easy and straight forward. It may take a while to understand the UI and options (happened with me)

AjitKumar · ‎07-15-2021

Hi @Aousien Custom is only the Label. The configuration inside both the Custom Policies are different. I don't think we can rename the Label as (Custom 1 etc).

AjitKumar · ‎07-15-2021

Hi @Aousien , If I understand you right. This should be possible. You may add another entry and define a different IPSec Policy as per the requirement. (This should be a different Peer)

AjitKumar · ‎07-14-2021

Hi @BlakeRichardson Works for me.

AjitKumar · ‎05-21-2021

Hi @squidgy For a Warm Spare Scenario both the units of firewall in the network must of the same configuration. We cannot have 1 MX84 and 1 MX64 as Warmspares in the same network.

AjitKumar · ‎05-21-2021

Hi@UCcert Formatting is fine. How about the Date? Ex. 01/05/2021 01/05/2029

AjitKumar · ‎05-21-2021

Hello Everyone This is strange. If I try to download any of the logs from Dashboard in the CSV format - The date will not match the event date. The date captured looks unrealistic.

AjitKumar · ‎05-20-2021

Hi Mike, By WAN if you are referring to Internet Link - I can see a few options on MXes. Security and SDWAN -> Appliance Status [Summary / Up-link] (Gives us Real time and Historical Link Information) Connectivity status Bandwidth utilization Latency Loss Organization -> Summary Report (Historical) Uplinks - Overall performance of links Network -wide -> Alerts (Primary Links Fails / Restored)

AjitKumar · ‎05-17-2021

Hi @Davindahouse Can we try this? Creating a new network with 1 x MS120 switch? Also try holding the reset button for 30-45 Seconds. If possible lets keep the switch disconnected from power source for a minute or so.

AjitKumar · ‎04-18-2021

D

AjitKumar · ‎03-24-2021

Awesome Job mate. Many Thanks for sharing the Project Details. Regards Ajit

AjitKumar · ‎02-17-2021

Hi @MMoss For us, this works. Could you please try updating the firmware - if already not?

AjitKumar · ‎02-15-2021

Hi @gumuxisi I believe this should be fine. We have the following available interfaces on MX67C: WAN: 1 × 1 GbE LAN: 4 × 1 GbE (1 optionally available for WAN connectivity) 1 x CAT 6 LTE Cellular Modem USB: 1 × USB 2.0 for 3G/4G failover (supported devices) Check the following thread for more details https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Cellular/3G%2F%2F4G_Cellular_Failover_with_USB_Modems However looks like Aircard is modems are compatible on MX and/or Z-Series appliances, but are no longer available for sale from their respective carriers or manufacturers.

AjitKumar · ‎02-15-2021

Hi @sankar This can be be achieved with the help of APIs. However we need to have good programming skills.

AjitKumar · ‎02-08-2021

Hi @Xavier_o , Looks like this should be possible with the configuration of Traffic Shaping. Security & SD-WAN->SD-WAN & Traffic Shaping -> SD-WAN policies-> VPN traffic -> Add a preference

AjitKumar · ‎12-03-2020

Hi @NishikaKamat As both the SSIDs are in bridge mode. Is there anything in between the network blocking the contents (Firewall / Proxy)? Are the APs management IPs whitelisted (Unrestricted) as Guest SSID can access every content? How is the network connectivity? Data Flow?

AjitKumar · ‎12-03-2020

Hola @WERC_COLOMBIA La comunicación con las IP de Meraki Cloud es confiable. No vemos una amenaza aquí. Para el invitado, puede elegir el contenido / categorías en Seguridad y SD WAN según sus necesidades comerciales.

AjitKumar · ‎12-03-2020

Hola @WERC_COLOMBIA Supongo que la única solución podría ser crear una política separada para los AP. Permitir el acceso a la subred de AP para acceder a cualquier destino. Esto permitirá el acceso COMPLETO a Internet, incluida la comunicación a la nube.

AjitKumar · ‎12-02-2020

Hi @Kasking I believe this option will appear only if we have a Meraki L3 Switch in our network. How is the output when you select "only switch clients" under Network-Wide > Clients.

AjitKumar · ‎12-02-2020

Hi Jim, This looks like more or less Plug and Play. I believe you are moving the devices physically. This means we need no changes on the Dashboard. We simply need to make sure the MX64W is live (connected to Direct Internet - with no Firewall) at your new branch office. You may follow this thread on - How to configure the IP Address. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Other_Topics/Static_IP_Assignment Rest of the configuration is already there in the cloud - Your Branch Office should be live.

AjitKumar · ‎11-13-2020

Hi @Andy66 I am not sure if would like the solution but seems like disabling Javascript is the only way as of now. https://support.google.com/websearch/thread/4928129?hl=en https://support.google.com/websearch/thread/28301966?hl=en Native Features on the Firewall may not help. May be Cisco Umbrella can be some rescue here - We need to explore this.

AjitKumar · ‎11-13-2020

Hi @imovaffagh This is my understanding. 1. In one Organization all the firewall (MXes) should have of one license type. [Enterprise / Adv / SDWAN] 2. We need to have separate set of license for every Organization. 3. We can always have Site-to-Site VPN between two Organizations - but this will be a 3rd Party VPN configuration. AutoVPN will not be possible. I also understand we need public Static IPs at both the ends for this configuration.

AjitKumar

Community Record

Badges

Re: MX67C 2 cellular connections