Please do. Remember to set the flex-radio before putting it into survey mode to 6Ghz and, have it connected to the dashboard for more then 2 hours 🙂 I'll eagerly await the result 🙂 Thanks 🙂 ... View more

PS: I now also have a case open, and so far, I have been told that the 9164 / 62 cannot "do" survey mode on 6Ghz because it is not a "flex-radio" ... excuse me, what ? I think it was just the support person who misunderstood what the support page says about flex. : https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Wi-Fi_Basics_and_Best_Practices/Conducting_Site_Surveys_with_MR_Access_Points If true, and it changed for some reason, because I have used 9164 for survey in the MR29 software, it should be in that document in large red letters or something 🙂   I did however notice that it now requires the AP to be online in the dashboard for at least 2 hours ( most likely to be sure of reg. domain ) before it will work. ... View more

Yeah, you can do " ap-type site-survey" as a command now on those 916x APs (from 17.something release) of 9800. - When I tried it, it worked just fine. But .... unfortunately, for some reason, i got locked out of the AP after logging into the UI the first time. The default, in DNA-Persona survey-mode, should be admin/admin, but for some reason it changed. I will try again at some point on a newer 17.x release.  ... View more

Well in survey-mode there is only one SSID. And it worked just fine in MR29 for those APs, so something has changed. And the "fun ting" is that the simple tool WiFi Explorer sees this SSID (on 6 GHz) in the first ... "5 minutes" after the AP has booted. Then it goes away. Unfortunately I have not gotten an Ipad with USB-C yet, so I cannot use the SK2 for a packet capture. I really want to see whats going on. ... View more

I think there is a bug in MR30 when in survey mode for 6Ghz. When switching to survey mode, I very briefly see the 6Ghz survey ssid from the AP when using a tool like WiFi Explorer Lite. But I NEVER see it using Ekahau SK2. My speculation is that the AP simply does not do FILS or Unsolicited probe response when in surveymode, and WiFi Exploere Lite only "found it" because the Intel NIC in my laptop did a passive scan. - This is bad, it has to do FILS or Unsolicited probe response in order for us to use it as a survey AP. (Im fairly certain it did in MR29 software, because I had a 9164 running in with that software for a long time in survey mode without issue). ... View more

Just for good measure ( measure, survey, pun intended ? 🙂 ), I created a case for "6Ghz not working in survey mode". I have yet to have any useful feedback on it. ... View more

This could work : https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Encryption_and_Authentication/Meraki_Local_Authentication_-_MR_802.1X As long as you can speak "LDAP" with your Azure AD. ... View more

Being a positive person, Im sure it will happen at some point 🙂 - Just give it a little time 🙂 ... View more

I would recommend setting the channel-width to something static, instead of auto (from the picture though, all your APs are running the same channel-width , so no worries) - But, from experience, some clients prefer wider channels, so for example, if an AP is running 80 Mhz but far away, and a much closer AP is running 20, some clients will still prefer the wide (but far away) AP 😕   And while you are "playing" why not enable more 5Ghz channels, looks like you are only using the non-DFS ones (depending on reg-domain of course). If worried about DFS I recommend enabling the Auto RF / AI channel planning. That actually seems to be ok, when in a DFS environment (again only from personal experience).    Also , from experience, remember to disable "Client balancing", I think it's still enabled by default on Meraki RF profiles. To me "Client balancing" is very useful for high density, like lecture halls and so on, but for a normal office environment, I always disable it, because historically, it has only caused trouble. ... View more

I see that the documentation for this has been updated (Last updatedApr 13, 2023). Now it does not mention any special , ehhh, "conditions" for different models. Will it now work, across all switches regardless of port density ? - do anyone know ?   ... View more

Perfect this looks like the (for now, until the 9300X is introduced in an "-M" SKU) answer I was looking for. Thank you. ... View more

Perhaps somewhat off-topic. Do anyone know if Meraki will support WPA3 iPSK with Radius ? Its possible to do on the 9800 WLC, as far as I can tell. ... View more

Well the though was that when you utilize Guest VLAN, then the client would be put into that VLAN on an access-reject. And I would just like to return some more config to that Guest access.   https://documentation.meraki.com/@api/deki/files/3974/MS_802.1X_auth_flow_chart.png?revision=1&size=bestfit&width=436&height=599 ... View more

So the answer is no. It can only apply GP on accept. ... View more

100% correct. Meraki has made a big "gab" in their switch portfolio here and now. The MS130 takes the low end (with mGig, but no SecurePort , and thats really too bad 🙂 ) - And the Merakified Cat9300 takes the highend from MS300 and the MS400 series. But where does that leave the MS200 series. No mGig and the , as far as I remember, longest living current switch. Will there be a Merakified Cat9200 with mGig and secureport that can take over ? ... View more

Do anyone have some numbers on those : "Significant performance improvements for MX250, MX450, and MX75 appliances." ? Because the numbers for the MX250 and MX450 with all security features enabled, are lower on the current Sizing guide then the one before that. ... View more

Sorry for the late reply. No - we kinda abandoned the troubleshooting on this point, because the prime problem was low signal strength for the current posistion of the MG. I do not have one in my lab, so I had no way of doing additional testing. ... View more

Perhaps we will get lucky at Enterprise Networking PVT in Amsterdam next week ? 🙂 (I still remember when everyone got a 3560CX wayyyy back .. fun times at security check-in in Schiphol that last day 🙂 ) ... View more

Yeah. I might open a case. I just want to be sure everything is connected correctly first (also a damm shame that there is no interface counters on the MX, its on my wishlist 🙂 ) ... View more

MG 3.100 MX 17.10.9 - MX68 ... View more

I would completely agree. But Im just wondering why they seem to match up with the : "Primary uplink status change" of the MG also. This seems strange to me. Why would the cellular interface change when the ethernet link goes down on an MG (not PoE powered of course).   ... View more

This is the MX log for ethernet port carrier change: Oct 25 14:19:06   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:19:02   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 14:17:49   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:17:23   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 14:08:25   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:08:20   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 14:03:37   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 14:03:34   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 12:02:25   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 12:02:22   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 12:01:03   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 12:00:28   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 11:57:32   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 11:57:30   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:35:24   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:35:21   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:34:08   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:34:03   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:33:59   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:33:42   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 09:32:21   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 09:32:18   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 07:34:31   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 07:34:27   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 07:33:16   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 07:32:22   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false Oct 25 07:30:35   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: true Oct 25 07:30:32   Status Ethernet port carrier change device: port0, carrier: false   ... View more