Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join nowAbout MariamT
MariamT
Here to help
Member since Oct 6, 2021
Dec 26 2024
Mariam Tissir
Community Record
16
Posts
2
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Oct 2 2024
4:53 AM
Helo @Mohanms , MX2 is normally passive and should not handle any traffic unless MX1 is down . if the MXs are connected to the same ISPs check the cabling , check if you have misconfigured a vip for the MXs, if you disable MX2 as a spare, what's the output of the Tshoot ? are you sure that the MX1 and 2 see each other through LAN (VRRP) and are on master/spare mode ? they may be both on master mode and you have an asymmetric routing . I think that a deep Tshoot can show what's wrong in this case , if all is good, I suggest that you ask for Meraki support help .
... View more
Jun 20 2024
1:00 AM
Hello everyone, Does anyone know if I need to quote the probe cable for the MT11 sensor separately, or if it comes with the sensor in the main package? I'm confused because I don't see the cable listed in the package contents in the installation guide : MT11 Probe Sensor Installation Guide - Cisco Meraki Documentation Thanks. MariamT
... View more
Jan 3 2024
1:45 AM
1 Kudo
Thank you @DarrenOC , I'll send that link to the client and see what we'll get .
... View more
Jan 3 2024
1:11 AM
Hello everyone , My client uses Cisco Webex softphone on his Lan machines . I have opened the ports : 1) 5062,8934,6970 TCP 2) 5004,9000 , 8500-8700 UDP 3) SIP : 5060-5070 TCP . But the client can't make calls , but it works when he switchs to his mobile connection . Do you think there may be other ports that I should open on the Firewall rules ?? P.S : the ports 443 , 80 , 53 , 123 are also opened . Thank you .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
Oct 23 2023
1:45 AM
1 Kudo
Hello All, Thank you for your answers/Questions in order to help me troubleshoot . The issue has been detected as part of Microsoft Windows 11 OS , the slowness was only raised to us by WIN11 users once the native VPN is active . There's no clue to help resolve this , except to unistall some windows KB updates ( seen on Internet) . to this day , Microsoft hasn't deployed a corrective patch to this issue . Have a good day 🙂 !!
... View more
Aug 10 2023
4:52 AM
Hello all, One of our clients reported that internet connection gets so slow when users are connected via Client VPN . I checked on the dashboard and there's no bandwidth limit on users . If it was only one person facing this issue I would say that it's an issue from their own Internet acess , but since it's a major issue , I want to see if there's something I can do from my side . Can you please advise me of the troublshoot I should do ? Thanks in advance .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Auto VPN
-
Azure
-
Client VPN
-
Firewall
-
Other
Jun 16 2023
2:48 AM
Hello all, I am installing Meraki MX85 on 5 sites , a hub site and 4 spokes . On one spoke I have a website on a LAN server , to get to this website from the internet , the request is first sent to the hub where there's a fortinet FW (That will be replaced by an MX85) , this FW send the request to the spoke site via a redirecting rule . My client want to keep the same configuration : to get to the website hosted on a lan server of the spoke , requests should be sent to the HUB ( MX 85 ) and then from the hub the request is sent via SD-WAN to the spoke. I tried to add a Nat rule but it's not working as the subnet of that server isn't declared on the hub . Does anyone have an idea of how I can route traffic sent to this spoke site via SD-WAN please? Thanks .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
3rd Party VPN
-
ACLs
-
Auto VPN
-
Client VPN
-
Firewall
-
Other
Jun 15 2023
9:11 AM
Hello all, I am installing Meraki MX85 on 5 sites , a hub site and 4 spokes . On one spoke I have a website on a LAN server , to get to this website from the internet , the request is first sent to the hub where there's a fortinet FW (That will be replaced by an MX85) , this FW send the request to the spoke site via a redirecting rule . My client want to keep the same configuration : to get to the website hosted on a lan server of the spoke , requests should be sent to the HUB ( MX 85 ) and then from the hub the request is sent via SD-WAN to the spoke. I tried to add a Nat rule but it's not working as the subnet of that server isn't declared on the hub . Does anyone have an idea of how I can route traffic sent to this spoke site via SD-WAN please? Thanks .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
3rd Party VPN
-
ACLs
-
Auto VPN
-
Firewall
-
Other
May 3 2023
5:50 AM
Hello All, I have a stupid question but I'm having doubts about it. I have full admin acces on 2 organizations and I need to move a license from an org to another . Would I only have to click on "move" next to the licence key or is there another way to do it ? Thanks .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Other
Mar 6 2023
7:00 AM
ooh ok thank you , I'll try that again . I'v been getting this message saying that the route overlaps with a vlan on the MX . Thank you for your time and support 🙂 !!
... View more
Mar 6 2023
5:46 AM
he has many routes to remote sites /24 using this nexthop. the 192.168.1.250 is used by another router on the LAN that has the vpn solution on it . and the LAN of this site is also 192.168.1.0/24 , so When Meraki wants to create the route sees that the next hop belong to the LAN and then can't validate it .
... View more
Mar 6 2023
5:27 AM
Hello everyone, I have a client using an internet box with a dedicated public IP address , and in order to connect to his remote sites, he uses a VPN solution on another router on his LAN . I will be replacing the first BOX with a new ISP BOX and a meraki MX85 . in the current situation, my client LAN subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 so to connect to the remote sites he directs all traffic to the router on the LAN , via next hop 192.168.1.250/24. the issue is that have to put the same old config as it is on the MX . LAN Subnet 192.168.1.0/24 and static routes with the 192.168.1.250/24 as next hop . but this is not possible since the Meraki sees the Next hop in the LAN and doesn't allow the creation of the routes. Is there any way I can overcome this without changing the next hop on that router on the LAN and without changing the LAN subnet on the MX ? Thank you in advance .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Firewall
Feb 27 2023
8:13 AM
Hello , Can anyone please help me understand this , I'm a little confused about how Meraki MX routes Internet traffic to a third party vpn ( ex: Zscaler ) . Do we add a rule or a static route to force all internet traffic to go through this tunnel ? knowing that by default if the Load-balancing is disabled on the MX all internet traffic uses the primary uplink . Thanks in advance 🙂 !!
... View more
Feb 16 2023
8:47 AM
Hello , I suggest that you create a new network in the dashboard just to add the new MX . and then connect both MXs to one switch , and in the switch create 2 vlans , one Vlan would be redirected the the Old Mx and the second to the new one . but for management purposes your new MX needs to have internet access so try blocking everything on l3 rules except the Meraki flows .
... View more
Jan 18 2023
7:54 AM
Hello Meraki community, See if anyone can help me please , I have a question regarding client VPN configuration , if an MX with a main line WAN1 and a 4G backup router and the client VPN on the users PC is configured with the Mx hostname (not the MX public IP) . would the client VPN tunnel still be working on the 4G backup line if the wan1 is down ? Thank you in advance .
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Client VPN
-
Firewall
-
Other
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1756 | |
| 1 | 2114 |
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
