Are you looking for the output in the results default tab called Body > Pretty? ... View more

There is a note about using a trunk port connected to the AP to detect rogues on all/other VLANs   LINK ... View more

Should be possible now https://community.meraki.com/t5/API-Early-Access-Discussions/Now-in-beta-manage-default-amp-built-in-wireless-RF-profiles/m-p/210400 ... View more

Do you have multiple sites that use MGs? Do any of them respond to ping? Which carrier? I find most carriers (at least in the US) use CG-NAT and seldom do I see their WAN IPs pingable.   Do these sites have a non cell provider on the other WAN? If yes is that IP pingable? ... View more

I would recommend anyone having an issue open a Support case and not make any assumptions based on this thread. I checked the case mentioned below and it's not tied to any known issue around eth speeds on APs. The APs in that case show event log messages that point to another problem not eth speed related. ... View more

My MX68CW starts with 0C:8D:DB and matches the MR behavior listed in this doc with MX SSIDs 1-4 aligning to what the doc shows for MR SSIDs 2-5.   My MX68CW   Base MAC              0C:8D:DB   SSID 1 2.4GHz       0A:8D:DB SSID 1 5GHz          0A:8D:CB SSID 2 2.4GHz       06:8D:DB SSID 2 5GHz          06:8D:DB SSID 3 2.4GHz       02:8D:DB SSID 3 5GHz          02:8D:CB SSID 4 2.4GHz       1E:8D:DB SSID 4 5GHz          1E:8D:CB   And, the last half of each BSSID MAC matches the last half of the base MAC ... View more

It would need to be tested, but the other option would be place 2 APs in 2 different networks. Each network would contain one gateway and one repeater. That would keep the repeater assigned to a single gateway AP. No idea how the switch would treat it though. I'd have to set up a lab to test. ... View more

I would not expect this to work as it's effectively this unsupported topology https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Wi-Fi_Basics_and_Best_Practices/Extending_the_LAN_with_a_Wireless_Mesh_Link#Unsupported_Topology_Example:_Additional_MR_on_Remote_Side     ... View more

You should contact Meraki Support and have them roll you back to 25.13 and monitor if the issue still persists  ... View more

Any of the MX license levels will support what you stated. For the full list of features for each license level refer to this doc https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Licensing/Meraki_MX_Security_and_SD-WAN_Licensing#Features_by_License_Option ... View more

The CW9164 PoE requirements are in the datasheet https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/MR_Overview_and_Specifications/CW9164_Datasheet#Specifications   It can operate on 802.3at and bt. There is no supported low power mode on af power. ... View more

I run RADIUS with WPA3 and have seen no issues.  ... View more

You lost me with your topology explanation. However, the two common topologies we recommend are documented here https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MX_Warm_Spare_-_High_Availability_Pair#Recommended_Topologies   MXs don't participate in STP, but the BPDUs from switches will flow through the MX LAN ports as long as you aren't dropping untagged traffic. As long as STP is configured properly on your switches spanning tree behavior should behave just as if the switches were directly connected as the MX LAN is just kind of a passive bump along the way in this design.   I also have an animated deck showing the behavior of MX HA and dual switches in this deck https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1yFB7tffTaBexz2mq7UWBJaUiiGhV45bzIZRmuo3b7R8/edit?usp=sharing ... View more

It's important to understand how Sensors communicate with gateways. It's not like a wireless client connecting to an AP in which you typically expect a connection to the nearest AP based on signal strength.   The Sensor periodically wakes up and sends an advertisement. That can be intercepted by any gateway in the same  dashboard network and within BLE range. The gateway will reject the connection if heard at less than -85 dBm. We still report these connections in dashboard however which helps to show which gateways are out of usable range for each Sensor.   In the table above I assume the gateway is what shows on the Sensor overview page RSSI column? That will report the most recent gateway to hear BLE from the Sensor (even if worse than -85 dBm). That doesn't mean it's the only gateway that heard it nor is it the best RSSI gateway. You can see the entire list of gateways that hear the Sensor by drilling into the Sensor detail page and viewing the Device details tab.   Finally, the gaps in the charts. I too see that every now and then specifically for my MT40s. I've also chatted with MT Prod Mgmt about it. Please open a Support case on this one so it can get some visibility. ... View more

The C9800-L-F-K9 is a Wireless Controller and we don't today support this in dashboard ... View more

You could move to templates but that does require evaluation, testing, and downtime.   If you plan to remain non template bound the API would be the way to go. https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api/update-network-wireless-ssid-firewall-l-7-firewall-rules/  ... View more

This thread contains a diagram of how to connect a passthrough mode MX https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/Physical-connections-for-MX-in-passthrough-mode/m-p/127859 ... View more

For a visualization it should look something like this example. Just make sure in Network-wide you map the "clients wired directly to Meraki APs" to a SSID with the VLAN you want. It can be any bridge mode SSID including a SSID already used for regular wired clients.   ... View more

I would not expect that to extend your time. But you can give it a try. ... View more

This topic has been covered over and over on the Community. If you can't find the original owner to have them remove it from their network then you cannot use it.  ... View more