I have AI-RRM , FRA , AI Channel planning and Busy hour configured on 15 networks to do a PoC.  Each network has between 6-22 APs in normal open office environnement.    FRA seems to be super agressive on some sites.    More than 1/3 of the radios are disabled on this network.   The stats ( made by the tool ) looks okay , but you do see a big swing in score everyday. There are a lot of channel changes and Tx power changes. Way more frequently than before.  I'm still in the 14 days training period , I hope it will become less agressive in the future.   ... View more

How far away is the nearest airport? ... View more

Thats a great idea especially when troubleshooting, thanks for sharing.  ... View more

As long as you are not using VIP, it won't matter.  Both MXs can go active. ... View more

Could you just update the existing VPNs? ... View more

APs previously on 1 Gbps suddenly negotiating at 100mbps after a few hours (Wi-Fi 6, 6e)   I've seen this on non Wi-Fi 6 AP's... that can't get this firmware 😡 ... View more

Thank you ... View more

Not currently. Please work with your Cisco account team to help prioritize this request. They will know what to do. ... View more

What QoS configuration have you configured on the end user devices and is it trusted end to end? ... View more

For sure it's a hurdle. Another option, although it also comes with a compromise of reduced term length, is to have Support convert the license to SDW from whatever tier it's using now. ... View more

I have a pair of MX68 in HA mode with two WAN connections to ISP routers with each router with a dedicated /28 public subnets. VRRP address configured on the MX68. We a have a MR44 connected to port 11.  If WAN 1 is disconnected traffic doesn't failover to WAN 2. The WAP goes offline. The WAP is using the VRRP address as its public ip address. A packet capture shows any traffic with source of the VRRP failing. When I change the setting to use physical IP address. The WAP comes online. Traffic fails over to WAN 2 with no issue. Is is this normal behaviour or are firewall rules needed to use the VRRP address? ... View more

Interesting; looks like Cisco 8000 Series Secure Routers will only be supported under the newer Subscription model not Legacy Co-term License Model. Another good reason to get customers moved over to Subscription.   Subscription Sidenote: I wish Cisco would hurry up and introduce a "Click to Convert to Subscription" option similar to what we could do previously with conversion from Co-Term to Per-Device License Model, so we don't have to wait for the network to be expired or be in grace-period to be able to convert by way of claiming the Subscription Key. I'm sick of having to buy Legacy Co-Term every time the customer adds new hardware to their Organization thereby pushing their Co-Term date (and their ability to convert to Subscription) out further and further.  ... View more

You can use this API to get a list of the valid event types. https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/get-network-events-event-types/   ... View more

I'm so used to people using the library that I didn't notice the OP was doing it the hard way. ... View more

You can tag a network to be included in a VPN, but you can't tag individual subnets. https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Site-to-site_VPN/Site-to-Site_VPN_Settings#IPsec_VPN_Peers   ... View more

Cisco Meraki Case 13390694: 802.11 Association Error Code 30 ... View more

Further to my earlier email here is the link to the form to apply for 5.8GHz Band C License https://www.ofcom.org.uk/siteassets/resources/documents/manage-your-licence/fixed-wireless-access/5.8_app_form.pdf?v=333841  ... View more

 It would appear to be a postman issue. Works fine in Python. Many thanks ... View more

Depending on the number of sites you have, would replacing the 10.0.0.0/8 with a series of /14 networks instead work?   route 10.0.0.0/14 ... route 10.4.0.0/14 ... route 10.8.0.0/14 ... route 10.12.0.0/14 ... route 10.16.0.0/14 ...   ... View more

Meraki really need to add this to the API. I have a high profile site where they are close to maxing out a pair of MX450's we really need to see the number of sessions ... View more

Thank you, @ww !   That's right! Usually there is no configuration change.   But the way event log type and description is implemented gives the impression something changed.   Feel free to make a feature request by going to the bottom right-hand corner of your Meraki Dashboard and sending the request through the "Give Feedback" bubble.   Once you sent your Feature Request using the "Give Feedback" bubble, our Internal Team will process your suggestion and eventually you'll have your feature in the future. Please note that there will be no estimated time to implement such feature. Hope this information is useful. Feel free to post or comment anytime if you have further questions / concerns. ... View more

Thank you very much to comment your experience. It's very helpful for us. We have a strongest signal from the cell provider. I think the MG is a very nice solution and integrates perfectly with all Meraki system, evidently.  I give you my first Kudo. Thank you. ... View more

That was the conclusion that I have come to. I do find it weird that Meraki don't provide a list of models and their identifying serial identifier ... View more

Yes this looks correct and I see you have added the local and remote IKE ID as well. ... View more

@rsage_voda or @shachafpeer or @PhilipDAth  Any guidance or updates available on this situation? ... View more