What OS are you using, just Windows 10? We are still running Windows 7 so this powershell command unfortunately is available. ... View more

DId you get a fix to this @JWadman .  I have an entire set of "paper weights" right now and I am trying to find a work around.  Thank You for any info.   ... View more

@MRCUR wrote: @Mosquitar wrote: Hi,   Did you ever get this issue resolved? If so, what was the fix as we are experiencing issues with a topology similar to yours.   Thanks Unfortunately not. I had to reopen the support case today as the issue (likely with DNS) is still occurring and causing instability for the 425 stack. The school year ended before we were able to determine a root cause last year so hopefully it can be found this time around.  The remaining issue is being caused by malformed DNS packets through the app X-VPN - https://xvpn.io/. The individual packets are significantly larger than would be expected for a DNS response and are possibly all being sent to the MS425 CPU to process for DNS inspection.    We've put in place ACL's on the 425 stack temporarily to block all DNS traffic that does not go to or come from our internal DNS servers. MS engineering is looking into the issue.  ... View more

Any updates on this issue? I have been having this problem on my ms-220s and sure enough tried to update to 10.40 tonight and 1 of the 220s hung. It is not easy for me to get to this switch and rebooting the switch never seems to help.   this issue has been going for over a year and still happening? Has anyone found a way to fix this remotely? ... View more

Yes the MX can support having the same NAT on both WAN links. Here is the info on configuring it: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/NAT_and_Port_Forwarding/Port_Forwarding_and_NAT_Rules_on_the_MX   You simply specify Uplink as Both. ... View more

Thanks Dante23. I opened a case and they did the same. ... View more

As long as you have a route to the camera VLAN, you'll be okay.  ... View more

@capricorn80 wrote: If a machine is not talking 802.1x the how can you use certificate? This is for devices like chromecast, amazon sticks etc.  Also Meraki is not support both MAB and 802.1x with same SSID. MAC auth can work well for those types of devices if you don't want to do PEAP with them.  ... View more

@BradB I recently completed the CMNO.  I'd like to see a training course based around each set of Monitor and Configure tools (Network-wide, Teleworker gateway), each one it's own couple hour to half day class that goes much more in depth on each and the capabilities.  Feels like having a hands on course would really help with the "How to's" with Meraki.  Also since there can be different levels of administrators, a course aimed at usage in that role? ... View more

Did you get this resolved? I've deployed this via GPO but the clients then aren't appearing in Devices on Meraki.   To deploy it, I deployed via the Computer and not the User. ... View more

See here for my current Azure costs: https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/TCO-for-vMX100-in-Azure/m-p/30075 ... View more

So about the MR26 firmware ... I just bought some MR42E access points.  After going through support channels and asking questions I come to find out that they can only run on MR26 firmware but yet in the portal, in your literature and anywhere else there is no mention of this firmware version even existing (from a new customer perspective).  Then I come to find out that I can't even read about it as it's brand new beta code etc .... this seems to be a recurring theme with Meraki I'm quickly learning.  I also purchased Insights and to run it I have to run the latest Beta code on MX gateway to even use it.   The lack of transparency here is staggering and gives the impression that Meraki is happy to get the revenue and not happy to share anything up front about it's code... I have to say, before looking to roll out Meraki across an entire country, that this has me quite concerned. ... View more

I've had much better luck with MS devices when the management VLAN is not the native VLAN on the uplink interface(s). MS devices like to tag their management traffic all the time which can cause issues when the native VLAN is the management VLAN.  ... View more

will be the MX, the Core is already configured pointing at the FW ... View more

This visitor - they are using a client VPN? If so, the client VPN should be giving out the custom DNS servers. ... View more

I´m on it 🙂 Waiting for an answer. ... View more

This is my cisco config ------------------------------------------------------------- router eigrp 100  network 192.168.23.0  network 192.168.253.0  network 192.168.254.0  redistribute connected  passive-interface Vlan254  eigrp router-id 192.168.16.1 ! ip default-gateway 192.168.23.254 --------------------------------------------------------------- ... View more

Bear in mind that software updates come via the Mac App store, turning this off would also affect the machine being able to access the App store. It could also affect iTunes as well.  ... View more

Also it looks like that SFP is designed for multi mode fiber.  Are you sure that is what is running between your MDF and IDF?  Is it possibly single mode? ... View more

Thanks Dennis ... View more

Adam's correct. Clone only covers layer 2 portion.     What you can do is enable Layer 3 on the switch device, then move the L3 interfaces over from the old switches. In the Switch  > Routing and DHCP section.  You'll have to build the first interface and set the default route before you can move/copy the interfaces and any static routes.   You will also want to make note of any relay settings.  In the early days those didn't move either. I can't remember if they move now. ... View more

Another thing to note about the software update delay payload: it defers X days from when Apple releases the update to their catalog, it does not defer from the date you push/install the profile. ... View more