the process to replace a stack switch member is here https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Stacking/Switch_Stacks#Replacing_and_Cloning_Stack_Members   and yes, the license warning will go away when you complete the process above as you won't be using more switches than you're licensed for. ... View more

correct ... View more

that's not how templates should work. a template requires switch profiles bound to switches to enforce a config. if the template has no switch profiles then switches in combined networks bound to a template should receive no config/no override of whatever config was already in place. ... View more

one other note. if you plan to use templates for the branch/spoke sites the firewall rules can use objects that reference the underlying site specific subnets. per your example, the template firewall rules could use objects for workstations, phones, printers, guest, and vendor. dashboard works out that those objects actually refer to site unique subnets underneath like 10.201.x.x, 10.202.x.x, etc.   templates aren't right for everyone as they only allow a certain amount of variability. when you have sites that are very similar templates can be great. you'll need to evaluate if it works for your deployment.  ... View more

reviving this thread. spotted meraki ap's (via tv) at goodison park   ... View more

16.11 resolves this afaik. It’s in the release notes.  ... View more

captive portal should be working. what is your config for the splash page? click through, sponsored, sign-on with (insert your auth provider here), SMS, ISE, SM?   have you opened a Support case? ... View more

👆exactly  ... View more

that bar is just reachability between the device and dashboard ... View more

where did you acquire this AP from? it's claimed in someone else's dashboard. ... View more

video retention is based on the camera model storage (128, 256, or 512 GB) and the config under quality & rentention. as you configure the options on this page the dashboard will show you an estimate of the retention period.   https://documentation.meraki.com/MV/Initial_Configuration/Video_Retention  ... View more

i'd lob a case into support  ... View more

Most Wi-Fi 5 AP's are now supported in 28.3 (as posted by cmr above). Exception is the 30H.   MT documentation hasn't been updated to reflect this yet. But it's in the 28.3 release notes. ... View more

Or use camera profiles to define the config and bind the new mv to the profile to adopt the settings  ... View more

i'd have to test to see what it does. however, wan 2 of the mx i assume would be the comcast/cradlepoint wan IP under normal conditions? then if comcast fails the wan IP of the cradlepoint would now be the cell carrier IP?   but it would seem you're going to need port forwarding also on that cp device?   and perhaps not possible due to install location. but, could you instead land comcast on wan2 and use a usb modem connected to the mx250? that would eliminate the dual nat issue that appears would be the case when the CP is in front of the mx. ... View more

MT's need to be in the same combined network as MV's and MR's to use them as gateway. Also, make sure the MR's are running the latest 28.3 which supports MT. Older MR firmware doesn't support MT. ... View more

think of the mgmt int/IP on the meraki switch like just a client/host IP that needs to talk to dashboard. as long as the vlan is allowed on the uplink port(s) and not blocked by any upstream firewalls it should reach dashboard.   the native vlan/allowed vlans/port mode all need to follow standard switch config principles. meaning if the uplink is a trunk (most likely) it needs to be a trunk on the other end. and the native and allowed vlans should match.   again, in the world of meraki switches the mgmt vlan is a little different from what folks are used to with traditional switches. ... View more

i recommend you open a support ticket through dashboard or a phone call. they should be able to help you with this. ... View more

As you know the client count is a recommendation based on mixed traffic types and all services enabled. So, in some situations you could exceed the recommended number and still be fine. I always advise to not cut corners when sizing and factor in your anticipated growth.   As for the new MX's vs. the older 84 & 100. You definitely want to go for the new platforms. Tons of advantages on the technical side (throughput and port types). ... View more

at one point did you have vlans disabled on this mx? if the mx is running in single vlan mode (on the addressing & vlans page) clients will show as being on vlan 0 on the client summary page vlan column.   if you just recently enabled vlans on the mx maybe the client page is still showing those old vlan 0 entries based on the time range you have selected. ... View more

if there are no clients on a given VLAN that VLAN number doesn't show up in the filter. a client must first exist in a VLAN and then it should show up as a filter choice. ... View more