Meraki

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 17 2021

You should be able to use the CVR-QSFP-SFP10G adapter to use a 10Gbps transceiver in a 40Gbps port on the 450 https://tmgmatrix.cisco.com/?npid=2301

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 16 2021

Give this a look. It might deliver what you need. https://workspace.google.com/marketplace/app/meraki_tools/11340767263

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 16 2021

Orderable now

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 16 2021

In the interest of stability it's ideal to create the LACP config with the redundant links disconnected or disabled (the ones currently in STP block mode). But you can create the LACP config in your current state. Just be aware there may be a brief blip as it transitions from blocking to forwarding on each end.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 16 2021

It will switch to a non region specific SKU on Nov 30. So, it will just be MA-INJ-4. And you'd then add the region specific power cord. In your case that would be MA-PWR-CORD-EU. You should be able to still order the MA-INJ-4-EU until Nov 30.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 15 2021

Here's the complete JSON I'm sending when I do an update to the RF profile and set min data rates on 4 SSID's. { "name": "***RYAN TEST***", "bandSelectionType": "ap", "clientBalancingEnabled": "true", "minBitrateType": "ssid", "apBandSettings": { "bandOperationMode": "dual", "bandSteeringEnabled": "true" }, "twoFourGhzSettings": { "maxPower": "11", "minPower": "8", "minBitrate": "12", "validAutoChannels": [ "1", "6", "11" ], "axEnabled": "true" }, "fiveGhzSettings": { "maxPower": "14", "minPower": "8", "minBitrate": "18", "validAutoChannels": [ "36", "40" ], "channelWidth": "auto" }, "perSsidSettings": { "0": { "name": "meraki-cameras2", "minBitrate": 11, "bandOperationMode": "dual", "bandSteeringEnabled": true }, "1": { "name": "meraki-camera", "minBitrate": 24, "bandOperationMode": "dual", "bandSteeringEnabled": true }, "2": { "name": "meraki-camera", "minBitrate": 36, "bandOperationMode": "dual", "bandSteeringEnabled": true }, "3": { "name": "meraki-camera", "minBitrate": 54, "bandOperationMode": "dual", "bandSteeringEnabled": true } } }

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 15 2021

Setting different min bit rates for multiple SSID's is working for me. In your put you're adding the relevant SSID number beyond just "0" yes?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 15 2021

I just tested this albeit using Postman, but it allowed me to change the SSID bitrates. I used the PUT/networks/{networkId}/wireless/rfProfiles/{rfProfileId} endpoint

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 12 2021

To confirm on the static WAN IP's. They both show in the same subnet, but one has a /24 mask and the other a /29. Is that correct or is there a typo on the /24 one?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 12 2021

You're trying to edit the default outdoor profile? Try creating a new custom outdoor profile and see if the call works on there. From what I've seen the two default indoor and outdoor profiles don't allow all the same API calls against them.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 11 2021

Not totally following. If you want to DM your MX serial number I can take a peek at the full config of it and the switches.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 11 2021

On the MX what is the full port config for 4 & 5? Trunk, allowed VLANs that you mentioned, but what is the native VLAN or do you have it set to drop untagged? Same for the switchports connecting to the MX. They are trunks with explicit allowed VLANs and a native VLAN set? This sounds like a native mismatch issue or allowed VLAN mismatch issue. If you set the ports on the MS and the switches to trunk, native 1, allow all what happens?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 11 2021

To power a Meraki MG cell gateway without the need for an injector, AC adapter, or PoE switch. Makes for a clean single cable option when using the cell gateway. And with a MX HA design WAN 2 from each MX can connect to the two ports on the MG41 giving both PoE redundancy as well as data path redundancy. I think some CradlePoints can also be powered via PoE so the MX85/95/105 could also work with those deployments.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 11 2021

MA-PWR-30WAC

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 11 2021

No you cannot use the WAN port for this use case. You’ll need a PoE injector, AC adapter, or PoE switch.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 10 2021

Port mirroring is only available when the source and destination ports exist on the same physical switch (or physical switch stack) https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Monitoring_and_Reporting/Packet_Captures_and_Port_Mirroring_on_the_MS_Switch

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 10 2021

As long as the MS carries the RSPAN VLAN it should work AFAIK

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 10 2021

The available firmware releases are all listed under Organization > Firmware upgrade. Stable = GA and is what is used when you create any new networks. You can view the release notes for all stable, RC, and beta firmwares on this page with the left and right arrows.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 9 2021

Not today unfortunately.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 6 2021

Is there a Support case open? Are you able to connect a phone directly behind the modem bypassing the MX to test? Is the phone service something internet based or going over a VPN tunnel back to a call server? I guess there's the other simple thing to try which is replace the cable from the modem to the MX. Is the event log for the MX showing anything?

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 5 2021

The only exam I see listed on the Cisco site is 560 https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/training-events/training-certifications/exams/current-list/cisco-networking-on-premise-cloud-solutions-ocse.html Not sure what 551 is. Googling it only comes up with exam dump links. Maybe 551 was retired or a beta version of the exam.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 5 2021

Do you know if it had a static IP on the WAN port? If so and you changed ISP's you will need to either reset it to use DHCP or a new static if this new provider is providing one. You can set the WAN IP using the local status page of the MX https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Tools_and_Troubleshooting/Using_the_Cisco_Meraki_Device_Local_Status_Page#MX_Series_with_Single_Dedicated_WAN_Link

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 4 2021

If this is just LAN to LAN traffic there's no default block rules between VLANs/subnets. Maybe I'm not understanding your diagram.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 4 2021

That should be it. When you apply a license the first step is dashboard shows you a side by side of the before & after impact of applying the license. This should be a license more devices process and not renewal.

Ryan_Miles · ‎Nov 4 2021

If this is just all LAN side traffic there's no NAT happening. And as long as you don't have firewall rules denying traffic it's just simple routing. Based on that diagram on MX A (left MX) do you have static routes for 172.16.30.0/24 and 172.16.40.0/24 pointing to the next hop 192.168.10.1? And you'd need the inverse on MX B. Statics for 172.16.20.0/24 & 172.16.20.0/24 pointing to the next hop 192.168.10.2.

About Ryan_Miles

Ryan_Miles

Ryan Miles

Community Record

Badges