This is what I use..   The hardcoded status_code = 201, is only declared for testing purposes and its just "faking" a succesful POST towards the API.. Remove it, and uncomment the actual request(). ... for _ in range(MAX_RETRIES): try: resp.status_code = 201 # r = requests.request( # 'POST', # url, # headers = headers, # data = payload # ) if resp.status_code == 201: if index < len(p_sitelist)-1: LOGGER.info(f"[ Create Networks ]: Network {site['Network']} created successfully! On to Next..") #print(f"Network {site['Network']} created successfully! On to Next..\n") break else: LOGGER.info(f"[ Create Networks ]: No more networks to create.") #print("No more networks to create.") return elif resp.status_code == 429: LOGGER.warning(f'[ Create Networks ]: Rate limited - Retrying after {r.headers["Retry-After"]}.') #print(f'Rate limited - Retrying after {resp.headers["Retry-After"]}.') time.sleep(int(resp.headers['Retry-After'])) continue else: LOGGER.critical(f'[ Create Networks ]: Unexpected status code: {r.status_code} returned from server.\n Msg: {r.text}') raise SystemExit(f'Unexpected status code: {r.status_code} returned from server.\n Msg: {r.text}') except Exception as e: LOGGER.error("[ Create Networks ]: Unknown error..") LOGGER.exception(e) #pprint(e) return ""   ... View more

I've been trying to get my hands on a couple of used MX'es just to be able to mess around a bit with BGP the Meraki Way. I noticed the same paragragh, that when enabling BGP, you'd be able to do iBGP over VPN, instead of using AutoVPN, and having the Meraki Cloud to organise the routes. What are the advantages and disadvantages of using iBGP between the Hub and Spokes, rather than using traditional AutoVPN? I have a deployment of Meraki SDWAN, that is still ongoing, where my trigger-finger is itching to enable iBGP, and a private BGP AS 65000 - just to see what happens. ... View more

@UmutYasar, redeploying the vMX, isn't that huge of a deal. It's just deleting the managed app from Azure, and (if you feel like it) deleting the Ressource Group. I have yet to find out if there is anything to do once, the vMX has been deployed and in production. Like I said - my ticket with Meraki Support is still open, waiting for them to determine a solution that doesn't neccessary require a redeployment. Unfortunately, I suspect that is the only solution. ... View more

Hey, As far as I know, there is no alternative. My ticket is still open with meraki development team, and there is still no update as of yet. You'll need to deploy the vMX in Availability Zone "None" to get a Basic IP SKU, in order to get ClientVPN to work on a vMX. ... View more

Peasants     😉   ... View more

Maybe due to lack of certification? Firm-/software not in place or too buggy to announce? It is not uncommon for vendors to ensure hardware is in place before software support. Give Cisco as an example. Their latest Cat 9100 APs have support for BLE/IoT with the hardware already in place. If memory serves me right, it contains a ZigBee radio. However, even though the hardware is already in place, there is no software support as of yet (last I heard, at least) ... View more

Honestly, I do have a suspicion that the MG41 has the hardware capability for 5G. But that it is just software limited. ... View more

So far they will be available to order by July 6th, with shipping starting July 13th. ... View more

Especially since Cisco already has a Wireless WAN router out, and been so for at least six months, that supports 5G. ... View more

Seems that the same goes for MG aswell: MG41   https://meraki.cisco.com/product-collateral/mg41-series-datasheet/?file ... View more

Security & SD-WAN -> DHCP     ... View more

@mmistretta wrote: [...] it wasn't until after configuring the local and remote IDs, the tunnel came up. Which is also a change in behaviour for MX15.42.1 firmware. From release notes;   ... View more

What model MX is it? Models MX6n have a shared WAN2 and LAN port, so in order to use WAN2, you'll need to convert a LAN port to WAN   I had .misunderstood the question, so just disregard. 🙂 ... View more

Have a look at https://meraki.cisco.com/public/mv-site-survey/index.html Perhaps, it could help you estimate the amount of MVs needed. ... View more

I'm not sure if this is available for public, but for reference; https://community.meraki.com/t5/Developer-Early-Access/api-mp-meraki-com-is-now-deprecated-please-use-api-meraki-com/ba-p/116260 ... View more

If the APs are connected to access ports and in vlan 1, configure the new SSID to Bridge Mode and disable VLAN tagging on the Music SSID. ... View more

Hah! I’d expect the antennas be better packaged. It is Cisco afterwards. 😆 ... View more

Have ensured the AP is configured in survey mode?   See here for instructions; https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/WiFi_Basics_and_Best_Practices/Conducting_Site_Surveys_with_MR_Access_Points ... View more

What’s in the “doggy bags”? ... View more

If you click on the Order no in Active Trial, that should bring you to the trial. From there you should be able to end the trial. ... View more

Regarding the SKU types, the vMX-M does not choose the IP SKU for you. You have to choose it yourself. There’s four different types, and the exact difference in performance I have no idea. But you need to choose the right one, because depending on what you choose you’ll not able to utilise ClientVPN due to some firewall rules that are being applied the IP SKU. ... View more