I have the same issue with an appliance running mx 16.16(?). The version is shown in the dashboard, but as "Not running configured version" using the api call dashboard . devices . getDevices or dashboard.organization.getOrganizationDevices ... View more

I'm seeing this same exact issue. We have unbound hundreds of networks, but there are 3 that we get an error on. We're using the Meraki dashboard to do this. I downloaded and analyzed the HAR data to find the "unbinding will not retain the correct config" response. Meraki support suggested it was trying to save MX and MR configs, but the network was switch only. We appeased their request by creating a combined network and then retrying but still receive the same error. ... View more

No worries! Glad you got it working. ... View more

You can put the conditions { networkId[s array], serials[ array], statuses[ array], models[ array], productTypes [array] } with the request:  Curl: curl -L --request GET --url "https://api.meraki.com/api/v1/organizations/12345/devices/statuses?serials[]=Q2CV-XXXX-XXXX" --header "Content-Type: application/json" --header "Accept: application/json" --header "X-Cisco-Meraki-API-Key: 1234567890"   Python: myDevDetail = dashboard . organizations . getOrganizationDevicesStatuses ( myOrgID , serials = myDev [ 'serial' ])     ... View more

@AmyReyes  your still is a wee bit smaller than my saint bernard.  😂 ... View more

Waiting for Elon Musk to offer to buy Cisco just so that he can make more money off the stock value.  ... View more

In Google Calendar, when you’re using a work profile on a device with Android 11 and up, you can now see your personal and work calendars together. ... View more

Awesome! I'll check it out for sure.   Thank you! ... View more

Hi, Yes, thank you for the reply. I did this way last week and confirmed it worked. I Hope Meraki changes the way of dealing with the fw rules of API. Have a nice day!   ... View more

Before/after would be useful to see how it's changed. You never realise when the things you don't notice have changed haha ... View more

Any chance you control a server/workstation on both ends of the link? Could look at iPerf testing between them. It's a little rough, but you can script around the iPerf3.exe to automate testing and log results per site. ... View more

Hurray!!! 😄 Thanks a bunch @AmyReyes  and here's to many more years of Meraki fun. 😄 ... View more

This sounds like the most practical solution for us. Thanks! ... View more

You might have IP restrictions enabled on who can use the API with this organization. Do check out that configuration in the Organization settings on dashboard. ... View more

I do not know if there is an endpoint that does exactly what you're looking for but maybe these can be helpful: https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-organization-devices-uplinks-loss-and-latency https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-organization-uplinks-statuses ... View more

Yea,  Really don't understand why reading values from a network would matter if its tied to a bound network or not.  I could see making changes, but reading values, especially ones that can be overridden,  should be an extra reason to have an API audit point. ... View more

There are several things you can do such as:   - Error catching -> If no errors are caught then its safe to assume things worked out  - Read API calls afterwards -> This will allow you to check the read data against certain conditions  Generally speaking though, the logic you're trying to do doesn't make much sense. The API touches only what its meant to and nothing else. There's no way to ensure that the correct configurations were made because it is not possible to define "correct" in terms of code, especially since the whole point of the script is to change the configurations and thus the definition of "correct" changes as well. If the script is meant to change configurations, that's exactly what it will do. Nothing else. ... View more

I don't think this is a beta API feature. I guess what they're trying to say is that staged upgrades can be accomplished using the API, but there isn't a specific endpoint dedicated to this.  If that is the case then this should be corrected on documentation ... View more

Thank you very much. The thing is that certain high usage clients are meant to be permitted so just trying to explore as many variables as I can in order to define the restriction most precisely ... View more

Ok, but now h ow do I troubleshoot a Docker container? (Thanks in advance) ... View more

The benefit of api tokens that can quickly be created and destroyed are that they are short lived, and less likely to be compromised. The vault product could create the temporary token and it would exist only for the amount of time needed for a job to finish it's work and then no longer exist. A job could perform any meraki configuration through the api. Even if we just had an API call to create and delete the API tokens for an existing user would be a small step to work towards this. It is inconvenient to have to come up with email aliases for a 'service account' that a human would never use, but not a show stopper to work towards short lived tokens. ... View more

@KRobert Try this script  https://github.com/NesAlba21/Meraki_Tshoot  I think this is what you are looking for ... View more

No worries, happened to me too. Basically someone in your organization who's an admin needs to go to the administrators tab and let you in. ... View more