About alemabrahao

WhitwickWindmil

Thanks guys, i tried all the things you suggested, reall really helpful. It turns out they were just accessing microsoft services, our warehouse system relies on this and is quite heavy in terms of traffic passing though it, nothing suspicious to report here 😁

Jmccandles

Thanks @alemabrahao . I was searching for Application ID filtering like the portals offered by PaloAlto Checkpoint in which we can check applications.

WB

Agree with comments about going for thw CW916x-MR APs although a CW9166 vs MR36 is very different spec-wise, a CW9162 is more aligned with that and a CW9164 aligns with the MR46. The main thing for me is future proofing with the 6E capability, depending on your reg domain you might be able to enable that from day 1 and marvel at the speedtest results 😉

ToryDav

I had never heard of them either. So far I like them, fast and easy 90 day certificates. What's really neat to me is the API. Haven't tested it too much yet however. https://zerossl.com/developer/

alemabrahao

So the accepted solution was not the solution. 😅

AmirKhan

Thank you for the info.

amelendez

I have a mix of mostly 6 inch patch cables there are some 12 inch and longer here.

cmr

@Joshua_T if you mean apply updates without having to schedule it, then the only option to get more frequent updates is to tick the try beta firmware in Network-wide Configure / General as below, otherwise you should get updates a few times a year:

ww

If your question is per user in a vlan then what @alemabrahao posted If your question is to limit the vlan itself. Then, You cant. The bw limits are for users.

IvanMA23

Solo para confirmar esa regla que acabas de crear debe de ir agregada a una vlan para que a los usuarios les aplique las Politicas de grupo. No se puede enviar mensajes a los usuarios a menos de que ocupes Endpoint Managment SM, de esa manera tendras las gestion del equipo aplica para (IOS, WINDOWS, ANDROID, OS)

cmr

How are the two switches in the stack connected to the two MXs, or whatever firewalls you are using on the ISP connections? Or do you have one ISP connected to each switch?

HaniAbuelkhair4

Ya i expected that

alemabrahao

Yes, it is possible:

alemabrahao

Have you tried with this software? https://www.draytek.com/products/smart-vpn-client/

alemabrahao

Have you checked it? https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Other_Topics/Returns_(RMAs)%2C_Warranties_and_End-of-Life_Information#Warranty_Coverage_Period

alemabrahao

I didn't understand your question very well, but yes if you have a link with a good connection and especially if it is a dedicated link that the ISP guarantees the functioning of that link. But keep in mind that it's a two-way street, so where your application is hosted also needs to ensure good link quality.

Ryan_Miles

Not sure. On a quick search I don't see any open bugs on it. Probably best to open a Support case so they can file one (if one doesn't already exist).

ROCO

Thank you. This has solved our issue.

naderelmansi

I didn't do that before but I Think For the Access point, yes you can change the device because the license is not changed based on AP type such as LIC-ENT-3YR but you should remove the old AP from the dashboard and add the new one For MX Lic depend on device type LIC-MX95-SEC-3Y for MS is more restriction as it depends on the model and its ports LIC-MS225-24P-xYR

alemabrahao

Look at this, It's a little old but maybe can help you: https://community.meraki.com/t5/Security-SD-WAN/TCO-for-vMX100-in-Azure/m-p/30075 But I think you should consult a Meraki sales representative.

alemabrahao

So, all settings are good, my suggestion is to open a support case.

Surya10101

Okay. Thanks for the replies.

thomasthomsen

As mentioned by everyone, it's not "the correct" way of running your AP (aka. bad 🙂 ). But you could get support to disable the other radio chains, and only have the one with the connected antenna enabled. It would still be bad, because of no diversity or mimo features would be in use, but better then running something where the same features would ruin things more when running, ehhh, "improper antenna configurations" .

DannyR76

I did. I didn't like the answer and thought I would check here to see if anyone else had run across this.

cmr

Have you tried adding a custom option 3 setting the gateway to the IP in the subnet that is the switch? i.e. MX is on 192.168.0.2/24 DHCP gives out 192.168.0.3-254 Switch is on 192.168.0.1 Set option 3 to 192.168.0.1 and clients will use that as a gateway.

alemabrahao

Alessandro Abrahao

Community Record

Badges