Hi ReginaPhalenge, what version of firmware are you running? You’ll need to be on 17.18.2.  ... View more

It does! and they are all very happy and sharing bad AI stories.  We are already in a budget crunch, small community college environment.  This info freed up a lot that they did not want to spend at this time.   I am a Sr. Network and Telecommunications/CISO and have already dealt with a lot of AI issues.  While everyone was happily endorsing every flavor of AI it perforated our security posture and we are now having meetings at the federal level to sort through new controls for the state and agency subs.     This is a good example of decisions made on bad information sourced from AI.  Some of the stories going around now are pretty crazy but of similar nature to what we have discussed here.   Thanks for the backup info from everyone, I gave it all to them and it's what mattered today for sure.  "D"     ... View more

Both Meraki and I have been performing packet captures, and yes we do have some traffic "tromboning", but yes, I agree with your explanation, but we do have 3 VLANS now configured across this bridge, and that has been working correctly.   I just think a new firmware, or unfortunately we will need to replace these MR76's with something more robust.  I can ping one of our root switches in the stack, and the entry will appear across the bridge on this remote switch. Traffic eventually finds its way, but we are experiencing periods of high latency. Thank you everyone who has helped me with this. If we get to a solution I will come back and post.   ... View more

Thanks, I will read and check the post. ... View more

Hi Matt , let me know if you need any support , happy to work with you directly . tim@splashaccess.co.uk ... View more

ADSL for 100 users is way to slow, all it takes it one person to try and upload a large file to a cloud based system and your connection is going to fail for everyone else.  ... View more

Well done. They would have been tricky to figure out.  ... View more

I understand that Meraki defines it as 0 when the AP does not have a valid measurement, which in this case is common and normal in fast roaming. So I think the correct way would be to use "after" protocol and duration to assess roaming quality. ... View more

Great, glad that helped.  If you want to stay in the mid-range, 9174I seems sensible and especially if you have limited PoE/mGig.  The CW9174 is a well-balanced Wi-Fi 7 choice with full tri-band Wi-Fi 7 capability, but without requiring 60W PoE or 10G switching to get meaningful benefit even if the 60W/mGig is not in your wired infrastructure (yet).   So if you're limiting factor for now is 30W and/or 1G ports, while you might not realize the full benefits of 9176/9178 until you refresh switching, the 9176/9178 certainly step things up with more total radio capacity, 10G ports, and higher horsepower in general for high-density and more demanding enterprise environments.  And 9178 adds the 2nd 10G uplink port and the 4th client-serving radio so you can have full-time 2.4/5/5/6GHz.  But going back to your original post, if this is for your SOHO environment and coming from MR36/42, I think the mid-range 9174I fits well.    In this case, the CW9174I gives you the Wi-Fi 7 feature set and future-proofing but without over-investing in horsepower you may not immediately utilize until the wired side is refreshed (and might not ever really need or utilize in a SOHO deployment).   ... View more

This insight is very useful , however ( I don't understand why ) if the score is LOWER after enabling AI-RRM , Insight won't show the score. It will only show up if it's higher , which in my case isn't always true. On 15 networks , 6 of them the score is lower. ... View more

Whatsmyip webpage is used after connecting and end host in this specific vlan ... View more

Nice! And yes, excellent news! ... View more

You were talking about syslog right? can you please help with any sample logs received via syslog for roaming and supporting document if available. I was not able to find roaming events as part of syslog supported logs. ... View more

We discovered that when using two hubs in a hub‑and‑spoke AutoVPN topology across different locations, the backend routing must be identical; otherwise, certain destinations will be unreachable. Some of my remote sites have unstable internet connections, and at times the tunnel to my primary hub would go down and fail to recover. The secondary tunnel did not have a full routing view of the environment like the primary hub. According to Meraki Support, AutoVPN will only attempt to recover a tunnel once both tunnels are down. Just an FYI :). ... View more

Hi Philip,   of course I've checked that. Everything was ok with proposals, that means crypto settings matched on both sides, otherwise I would get a kind of "no proposal chosen" error   Best regards, Vladimir ... View more

Take a look ate this.   Subscription - Licensing SKUs - Cisco Meraki Documentation ... View more

This is your answer. ... View more

Thank you for your replies.   Unfortunately, it's not possible to use a switch, there are 50 sites to migrate, and we want to do everything remotely.   Yes, I tried CDP/LLDP, but it's not enabled for all devices, and we do not get relevant information.   It would be so helpful to get this data with API, as it's already available on the Dashboard.  I'll then try to get data manually before, by creating an inventory from the dadhboard.    Automation, but with manual steps 😅 ... View more

I have opened a support case, now. But "My cases" shows no open cases 🤢 ... View more

Boom.  This is a legendary answer.  🙂 ... View more

I haven't tried this, and I give you a 1% chance of success, but try: https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/get-organization-clients-search/   It returns lots of information about clients in the network. ... View more

That is unfortunate. ... View more

I like that idea; I've been looking into it more and it seems interesting. ... View more

@rodney wrote:   Hi everyone,   I’m working on a script that needs to add L3 firewall rules under a group policy, and I’m wondering if there’s any support for including a `source` field in the request payload. I couldn’t find any mention of this in the official documentation, but I’m curious if it’s supported unofficially or possibly planned for a future release.   According to for example, https://fast-pay.casinologin.mobi/ the schema for `L3FirewallRules` is as follows: and gain bonusses in cas   - `L3FirewallRules`: `object[]`    An ordered array of the L3 firewall rules   - `comment`: `string` — Description of the rule (optional)   - `destCidr*`: `string` — Destination IP address (IP, CIDR, FQDN, or 'any')   - `destPort`: `string` — Destination port (1–65535, range, or 'any')   - `policy*`: `string` — 'allow' or 'deny'   - `protocol*`: `string` — 'tcp', 'udp', 'icmp', 'icmp6', or 'any'   As you can see, there’s no mention of a `source` field. Has anyone tried including it anyway, or received clarification from the dev team?   Any insights would be greatly appreciated!   Thanks in advance! Hey! I get what you're trying to do, and yeah, it’s a bit tricky when the documentation doesn’t cover something explicitly. If source isn’t listed in the schema for L3FirewallRules , it’s likely not officially supported. That said, some APIs do have undocumented or beta features, so it could be worth reaching out to the support team or checking for future release notes. If you're feeling adventurous, try testing with the field and see if the system accepts it. Fingers crossed it works! ... View more