is this solved by now? or with the FW 18.2?     ... View more

No case We have a 3rd party VPN tunnel to Zscaler with a default route 0.0.0.0/0 and after a short time the tunnel was still up on dashboard but no traffic went over the tunnel We have also routes to MPLS (LAN) and a AutoVPN to AWS/vMX, both were fine   With the stable, we do not having these issues ... View more

Hi everyone,   2024, woah, it seems to be the futur ...... except for Sponsored Guest splash probably still stuck in the 80's 😅. In Europe we have to provide detailed connexions informations to authorities in case of request.   And we still don't have an integrated report that give all these informations ..   Ok API will rule the world so I'm starting my Postm....... No kidding, nothing but a [] as result ....  In 2024, we still only have clickthrough splash can give me something that I don't need.   Please Meraki, make Sponsored Guest (a killer feature) usable without a Syslog, at least, send a result with all informations in the result of GetNetworkSplashLoginAttempts <insert Puss in boots big eyes here >   A desperate Meraki Master. ... View more

I second what @ww states, ensure all your Meraki eqpt is in a separate VLAN/IP Subnet and exclude from the VPN ... View more

Hi John, Where did you find this option (wake-on-lan) in the Beta API doc?  https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/whats-new/v1-beta/#whats-updated I didn't see this point. Thanks! ... View more

ps. This will depend on your carrier and SIM - but I have never had to touch the PIN number field. ... View more

The trick, which that posts does not mention, is you must specify a zone of "none" when deploying.  And then it will work, as you describe. ... View more

I use Visual Syslog Server for Windows (maxbelkov.github.io) [which is free] installed on an on-prem PC/server and does not have any bandwidth restrictions. ... View more

Z3's here and a MX250 Hub.  18.107 caused major issues.  See this ping response!   Pinging 10.59.97.249 with 32 bytes of data: Reply from 10.59.97.249: bytes=32 time=1682ms TTL=60 Reply from 10.59.97.249: bytes=32 time=3423ms TTL=60 Reply from 10.59.97.249: bytes=32 time=3168ms TTL=60 Reply from 10.59.97.249: bytes=32 time=2440ms TTL=60 Request timed out. Reply from 10.59.97.249: bytes=32 time=1823ms TTL=60 Reply from 10.59.97.249: bytes=32 time=2578ms TTL=60 Request timed out. Ping statistics for 10.59.97.249: Packets: Sent = 8, Received = 6, Lost = 2 (25% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 1682ms, Maximum = 3423ms, Average = 2519ms   Rolling back to 17.10.2 fixed issue for most, but didn't work on all.  Seems the rollback fails often. ... View more

Hi @Fabian1  i am going to have warm spare MX with ISP2 public IP. One non meraki vpn tunnel is established to our Csr1000v1 in azure, and from warm spare i want to establish tunnel to CSR1000v2. I have no idea, where do you deploy the scrpt primary_link up and backup_up. Is it at meraki side or will be in Azure. I am new to this API thing. If you can share steps so that i will follow them to implement. Thanks ... View more

hi @Fabian1    how is failover working between zscaler frankfurt and munich.   at branch sites i have internet and mpls. i am planning to advertise proxy 1 ip via primary link (i.e private subnet of non meraki vpn peer), proxy 2 ip via secondary/backup zscaler link initiated via local internet link. while proxy 3 will be advertised via autovpn (proxy 3 will be advertised via zscaler in dc). all 3 proxy ip addresses will be configured in the pac file. any thoughts on this? ... View more

Hi @NetworkDemon I sent you a link via Postal.io to confirm your mailing address and claim your prize. It looks like that link has since expired. I'll connect with you via DM to get your information and resend it!  ... View more

Hmm, this is quote old now, and uses the V0 API (V1 is the current version now).   Are you sure you told it to restore to a new network name? ... View more

Customers using Starlink can run into issues using Meraki SDWAN  if they use 192.168.1.0/24 The Starlink router uses 192.168.1.0/24 for the local LAN subnet. If your office uses 192.168.1.0/24  as well then this will cause issues for SDWAN and VPN Traffic    Prior to version 15.44  you could have the WAN subnet the same as a subnet on the  SDWAN   the route on the SDWAN took preference. after 15.44 the traffic would go out of the WAN port and get lost. This issue was fixed again in 18.0.2 but requires Meraki support to do a back-end fix. The best solution would be to change the WAN subnet to a different range but this has been impossible. I recently had a Starlink at my office and with the help of support, there is a solution now. Starlink allows you to bypass the modem but you must have the ethernet adaptor   ====================================================== To bypass the router, go to the App home page > Settings > Advanced Starlink App version must be at least 2.0.19 to work The toggle button on to bypass the Starlink router This allows you to completely disable the Starlink Wifi Router. You would need to utilize a Starlink ethernet adapter in order to plug in your own equipment. While Bypass mode is enabled, router commands will not work. If the toggle switch does not appear in the Settings tab, can factory reset the router and/or delete and re-download the app. App Message in red text when Bypass is enabled: "Bypass Mode will completely disable the built-in Starlink Wifi router. this is an advanced feature that requires a Starlink Ethernet adapter and your own network equipment. A manual Factory reset will be required to reverse this." ==========================================================   As an interesting aside..  MY voice MOS scores change changed from 4.4  to 4.2  when using Starkink  and Packet loss was about 1%  Starlink MOS score   ... View more

I have a doubt for iOS devices that was co figured by SSP and after a period the certificate expired has an automatically way to update this without the user did the procedure manually again?   If I renew the certificate before the expired , Meraki will send to device the update of this certificate automatically?   Regards, JF. ... View more

I advise you to check the protocol used between the printers and the server, could probably using an ALG that would be working on Checkpoint but no on Meraki. For example FTP in active mode needs communication allowed to be initiated from both sites if FTP ALG is not supported. You issue would be going thru the same root cause...  ... View more

The SNMP Trap feature is a Beta feature.   SNMP Overview and Configuration - Cisco Meraki https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Monitoring_and_Reporting/SNMP_Overview_and_Configuration#SNMP_Traps > Enabling Traps > Contact Meraki Support to have the feature enabled on the desired organization   However, it appears to have recently been opened to the public. Therefore, it is additionally displayed in Firewall Info.   In my Org1 environment, I activated it when it was Beta. However, in my Org2 environment, it appears without activation. ... View more

CONGRATS! ... View more

I updated to 29.2 and its running very well. ... View more

Please check with support if you have any other options first! I'm only a customer 😉 ... View more

Love the Baseball Cap! Love the Program and the fun and info we receive............ Did I win yet? 😂 ... View more

Hi everybody!   Emails to winners have been sent, so if you haven't seen anything please PM me 🙂 Also, it has come to my attention that some folks are being asked to pay border taxes on their prizes. This is an error and Meraki is absolutely responsible for those fees, so please request from the carrier to have the charges sent back to the sender so we can cover them. If you have any questions, just PM me or reach out to community-help@meraki.com.   Cheers! ... View more

I'm using OpenDNS servers. Yes, I'm Because I performed a Lab at home. ... View more