I have inherited an MX100 and MS350 switch infrastructure which is connect to two Cisco 1941 Routers from our ISP Lightpath.  One of these router's speed is 500 MB and the other is 200 MB. I want to insure that our MX100 device is making full use of the available bandwidth.   There appears to be a technology in use here which I am unfamiliar with. Usually I would expect one router to be connected to port 1 (Internet) on the MX100 and the second router to be connected to port 2 on the MX100. This is not the case. See image below.   1941 router #1 is connected to Port 8 on MX100 and 1940 router #2 is connected to Port 9 on MX100. Port 6 on MX100 has a short cable connecting to Port 1 on MX100 and Port 7  has a short cable connecting to Port 2 on MX100. It appears that a VLAN has been configured between the 4 ports labeled "VLAN 4049 (HSRP Switch)", DHCP is turned off for this VLAN.   The deliverable is that I want to insure that we are making full use of the bandwidth. Both WAN1 and WAN2 are configured for 1 GB. There is a primary WAN indicated in the Up-link Selection.  I am assuming that I would want to have that set to the faster of the two routers. And if this is correct, I am not certain which router is associated with which address?    Any help in understanding what is going on would be greatly appreciated.                   ... View more

We have a Meraki MX100 firewall device. We currently have 2 internet ISP lines attached to ports 1 and 2 on the device. The traffic is load balanced across these two WANs. All is operational. The IT Director is requiring a 3rd internet ISP line be connected to this device and for all VIDEO traffic to be routed to this ISP.   Is this Meraki capable of supporting a third ISP line and being able to keep that line separated from the load balancing pool of WAN1 and WAN2,  so only specific traffic can be directed to that 3rd ISP line? If so are there any resources available which can provide some technical details on how to do this?   ... View more

We have a Site to Site VPN (HUB) which runs between NY (MX100) and China (MX84). I can use Remote Desktop Connection from China to directly connect to any server or workstation on the NY network. We also have a remote access gateway configured which we access from a webpage. We can connect to the RDS gateway and receive the RDS desktop with the published apps, but when we attempt to run any of the apps, the launching fails. I checked the site to site VPN config (below) an all ports appear to be open. Any guidance would be appreciated. thank you.         ... View more

We have a Meraki MX100 which users connect to local resources using the Meraki client. We notice a signifigant speed decline when running a full tunnel VPN when accessing the internet. Fox example, the split tunnel VPN with get 211 down when the full will get 113 down. This was tested during off hours. Is this all attributed to VPN overhead and the round trip or can something be done to improve performance?   I checked the traffic shaping, and we have that configured for 150 down and 130 up and the per client bandwidth is set to unlimited. When a client is connected to the VPN, which one of these values is the limiting factor. I would think its the up / 130.   I worked with a consultant to setup this devices. I'm not sure why the up is set to 130. We have 150 both ways to our ISP. before changing that I wanted to make sure the was not a reason for this.     thanks Steve   ... View more

I have several clients reporting security events in the Security Center of the MX100. If I go into the client and check the security event log in the client detail, no events are listed event though the date range is correct.   Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you  Steve       ... View more