My PSU looks to be the same for both units, but give me a couple hours and I can post some pics of both. ... View more

I'm showing the service is up as of now. ... View more

I did not know that, actually. Thanks! ... View more

I'm waiting to see your name on this list @SeanW .  🙂     ... View more

Same here.Was down for a moment ... View more

Packet Capture would be another good tool for the "Troubleshooter" role that I mentioned. ... View more

I have a site that has a combination of MR42 and MR86 AP's. Per the release documentation MR42's are on the list of SKUs that will be restricted to MR 30.x and will only be upgraded to their latest support version of MR 30.x.  Post upgrade the MR42's are showing a firmware version of MR 31.1.5.1?  Should I expect issues with these devices? ... View more

You are right. You can only use the MR-SUB with old APs, and the Wireless Network-SUB with new WiFi7 APs. - I just learned this.   But co-term licenses are "free for all".   BUT .... If you acquire WIFi7 APs during your MR-SUBs lifetime you can get your MR-SUB licenses converted to Wireless Network-SUB (I just read a very long document about it).   But whats really dumb is that you cannot, up front, when aquiring a new sub use the Wireless Network-SUB for old APs, why not just let me buy those ? I dont get it, at all.   @GIdenJoe  - I just PM'ed you a "thing" 🙂 Hope it helps. But still as I say right now about these licenses : "Alright, this has become far too silly, let's end this before it becomes sillier" - Monty Python ... View more

Thanks for your time in responding to this post. Sorry for the typos I was working on a small fire when I saw you replied and I wanted to respond quickly :). I don't want to turn this into the me show, so if any of the other forum members would want to share their thoughts please do :). ... View more

I want to bump this old post so I don't have to create a new one. I have been actively fighting this issue in the shadows for the past 18 months and got no where.    I know Meraki states that we can create a second org and apply the devices to that org but I have found the following issues.   MX's / Z require a new site per 2 devices (PIN4). Meraki support is giving mixed answers on this topic. Some state if you claim the device then your equipment is locked other support reps will quote the KB. I also have seen the sales team have mixed messaging on this topic as well. The disabled network email warning could cause a lot of unneeded questions within a company when using the inventory network. For companies that do not use APIs this process causes additional steps with inventory management by having to add or remove devices from one org to another. Installation documentation does not fully disclose the inventory process so there is an opportunity     For Meraki if a percentage of your customer base is unaware of this "requirement" they are left open to having their equipment taken from right under them, then having to go through support or sale to try to recover the equipment. This process hurts the customer from a time and frustration point of view, and Meraki from a customer perception and relation.    I will say other vendors that have similar systems will lock the equipment once the equipment is claimed, yet Meraki finds this solution to be better in some way.. I'm open to seeing that vision if there is a gain for me the customer.   Sorry for the small vent, but just wanted to float this out again.   ... View more

congrats everyone   ... View more

This may or may not help you, but I was playing around with this issue last night. In my home I have two Xboxes and a PS5. I had all the ports setup including the alternate ports for my second Xbox and I was getting strict NAT or Type 3. Now for giggles I went into the traffic shaping and told the MX to prefer WAN 1 and all devices either went to open or type 2. I also tried setting the rule to WAN 2 and once again the issue was in a good state. @PhilipDAth I'll give your link a read so thanks for sharing. ... View more

Thanks for responding.. I had a feeling that was the case. Open wish list for me having that page with a user vote option would be great so the community would have the ability to vote what our needs are. Don't get me wrong this single is would be rated as a low, but our feels of what the rating are as a collective view could be wrong.    Either way I do thank you for taking the time to share this info and listen to my random thoughts. ... View more

This picture shows it quite well:   ... View more

We're rolling out a bunch of the Wifi 6 APs, so not likely to bump up to Wifi 7 anytime soon. We tend to run about 2-3 years behind the newest standard as we don't need fast speeds.    I do worry about the constant build toward faster and faster speeds. Most of our apps are built to work at sub 15 Mbps speeds for our rural locations on satellite internet or other low-speed connections.  ... View more

We saw the issue with MX 85 / 95 units on 18.107.2.  MX's running 95% utilization or better!  18.107.3 seemed to correct the issue.     Learned to look at this python script /  API call after upgrades after that!    import meraki import os import pprint API_KEY = os.environ.get('MERAKI_API') organization_id = os.environ.get('MERAKI_ORG') dashboard = meraki.DashboardAPI(API_KEY, caller='TopApplianceUtil.py/v1.0') response = dashboard.organizations.getOrganizationSummaryTopAppliancesByUtilization(organization_id, quantity= 500, timespan = 2000) print ('lengnth = ' , len(response)) for mx in response:    #print(mx)    print(mx['utilization'], mx['model'], mx['name']) ... View more

Unfortunately, won't be able to attend the live event in Melbourne. ... View more

@paulreveco - sorry to hear! Can you please send an email to our community team at community-help@meraki.net - we will get your badge sorted! ... View more

Ok, aquí vamos de nuevo!!!, Here we go Again!!! ... View more