@PhilipDAth thanks for the reply.   Even if I set single_request_timeout to 300 seconds or any other value, I get back a gateway error from the api after 60 seconds. That's probably where the hard limit is for the api, so we can not set it to a bigger value than 60 seconds. ... View more

Check this out https://community.meraki.com/t5/Feature-Announcements/Firmware-Management-API-Endpoints-are-now-available/ba-p/114071 ... View more

That is the same article I linked in a previous post. Google oauth isn’t supported on DEP enrolled Mac devices. ... View more

In Dashboard and the current API I believe the only power consumption data is for switch port PoE...   powerUsageInWh   ...in the https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api-v1/#!get-device-switch-ports-statuses call.   We gather this for customer reporting to show daily switch PoE maximum vs. switch PoE budget (needs a manual lookup table of budget for each model), used/free ports are also tracked plus warnings and errors.   In our case this is for capacity planning rather than tracking consumption over time, for that you'd need to sample shorter periods.   ... View more

Full information of OSPF on MS switches https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Layer_3_Switching/MS_OSPF_Overview ... View more

There was indeed just a single uplink to the MX84 at the time of the issue. I connected the 2960 to the MX84 on a separate port just to test, it made no difference. It would pass VLAN2 traffic on the switches that it wouldn't pass VLAN1 traffic on, which was the most interesting bit.    The MX84 has been running without issue for about a year.    I'm pulling the Cisco SB switch as they are changing software vendors. I'm putting in a stack of 2960's for the main LAN, VLAN2 will most likely stay on an HP but we'll see what port utilization looks like after the 3x 2960's are installed.    All the HPE switches are using 802.1D, not RSTP (802.1W).   I unfortunately don't have access to the configuration on the Cisco SB switch, since it was vendor provided. That's another reason I'm inclined to punt it once they are out of the picture.   ... View more

Ok thank you for your feedback. Yeah, we wouldn't need to do any reconfiguring. Thanks for your help.   ... View more

UPDATE: this contest has ended! Stay tuned for the final points round up and the announcement of our many winners next week! ... View more

Thanks. Yes. I plan to put Z1 in another  dashboard network.  This has been helpful.    ... View more

One last update and, to document it in case some else has a similar issue. I believe we found the root cause of the failure. We have a Layer 7 Firewall policy that denies all Peer-to-Peer (P2P) traffic. Apparently 14.53 deals differently with that policy than 15.42. After many tests with the Meraki engineer we removed that specific policy and SAP started to work correctly. He (Meraki engineer) was checking at his captures and he stopped seeing the reset happening after the policy was removed. They are investigating what is causing that issue.    Thank you all for your help. ... View more

@DavidLowe I said it right, thanks 😊  ... View more

@GAQS808 @I see various organizations with multiple vendor stuff and that’s fine. I even see companies uses Meraki Access points with Mist APs on different floors not sure why they did that.. May be sales pressure from different vendor 😀but the overall infra is working very fine. So you are good to design whatever your requirements are and if you already have Poe switch with you then you don’t need that MS-120. ... View more

Thanks Inderdeep.   No I am looking for the Organization License status    https://developer.cisco.com/meraki/api/#!get-organization-license-state { "status": "OK", "expirationDate": "Feb 8, 2020 UTC", "licensedDeviceCounts": { "MS": 100 } }   status : (exact string values) 'OK', --- eg :  'License Expired', -License expiry date is in the past ??? ... View more

@Manish2 Sure buddy hope you got what you were looking for 😊 ... View more

Regarding the SKU types, the vMX-M does not choose the IP SKU for you. You have to choose it yourself. There’s four different types, and the exact difference in performance I have no idea. But you need to choose the right one, because depending on what you choose you’ll not able to utilise ClientVPN due to some firewall rules that are being applied the IP SKU. ... View more

Awesome, thank you for the help guys! ... View more

It works! So I tagged my two VLANs and did the same on my SSID's But the first time it didn't work.   Thanks for help ! 🙂  ... View more

The following are listed as compatible: MA-QSFP-40G-LR4 (single mode) MA-QSFP-40G-CSR4 (multi mode) MA-QSFP-40G-SR-BD (multi mode) ... View more

I may expect, But try this   When a tunnel drops, it's route is dropped as well, along with all affected sessions. Consequently, the outgoing traffic to the remote private network is sent out along the default route, usually through the WAN interface.   But, the Fortigate will establish a session for it, as there is a valid policy from LAN to WAN, destination ALL. Now when the tunnel comes back up, there is already a current session which has to time out first before a new session through the tunnel can be established. This causes a major delay in the data flow.   May be FIX  Create blackhole routes for traffic to RFC 1918 subnets, that is, 192.168.0.0/24, 172.16.0.0/12, 10.0.0.0/8 among others. These routes need to have a distance of 254 (not 255!) in order to kick in when there is no better route available. The route will be used when the tunnel goes down and traffic will be discarded; NO session is established. When the tunnel comes up again, a new session can be built right away, without any delay. ... View more

He is definitely a legend @PhilipDAth but you guys @cmr @DarrenOC   also support this community with your expertise. I am also new to this community and try my level best to share the best i knew whatever i learned when i was working with Cisco 2 years back as a Presales 🙂   Regards Inderdeep Singh www.thenetworkdna.com  ... View more

Is that configured with the Device owner mode ?  Have a look on below document if it helps in case you dont want the control over personal applications on the device. https://documentation.meraki.com/SM/Deployment_Guides/Android_Enterprise_Deployment_Guide   Regards Inderdeep Singh www.thenetworkdna.com  ... View more

@GFrazier That is correct, POE or UPOE never supported over the Copper modules. That is the key point to consider. Hope you got your answer whatever you were looking for ? ... View more