I'm actually still waiting.  As the person who took the call had to submit a case internally to another team.   Thanks for the input!   ... View more

But then we are left with a requirement of being able to setup some type of infrastructure to consume the netflows inside the network.  There are so many edge cases, branch sites, etc - Netflow doesn't really help me.   I have over 150 networks - I need a scalable solution to quickly and effectively answer the question:  "Where is bandwidth going RIGHT NOW".  It would be dead simple for Meraki to have better real time visibility, but they have chosen not to fix this for reasons that escape me.  ... View more

I agree, this is one of the biggest weaknesses of the MX.  A better real time view of conversations (without a packet capture) would be extremely helpful. ... View more

We are also seeing this, but it seems to only be on MX64W (w/ wireless). ... View more

In regards to connected devices causing device utilization - even overnight when connected clients went down by 25% (and close to or under 50 devices), device utilization remained at 100%. ... View more

After rolling back to 16.16, device utilization went back to 30% from 100%.  Support says it is because we are over subscribed - which is complete BS.     See their response here.  I'm fine with rolling back since 17.x isn't "stable" yet, but one would think that they would want to know about legit bugs in a "stable release candidate"   Thank you for your email.  Unfortunately, Network Support Engineers cannot control whether surveys are sent to customers or not.  I am very sorry that you are dissatisfied with my truthful, accurate and effective responses to your questions: 1.  I told you that, if your CPU utilization increased on our beta firmware, that you should rollback to a stable release. 2.  When you rolled back to a stable release, your CPU utilization returned to satisfactory levels--30% according to you. 3.  I told you, truthfully, that our Developers will not investigate a CPU utilization problem when the device is oversubscribed. 4.  The MX64W in this case is End of Sale: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Other_Topics/Meraki_End-of-Life_(EOL)_Products_and_Dates 5.  The MX64W in this case is oversubscribed--At the present time, the MX has seen 74 clients in the past day, 52 of which are still active.  The MX64W is not designed to support more than 50 devices: ... View more

We have 100 or more that we've updated with no issues (including many who were "over provisioned" from a # of clients standpoint).  I've not seen this behavior on any of them though. ... View more

Yes to IDS, and I'm not sure what you mean about the "snort error".  I did reboot several days ago, but that didn't change anything.  I should have disabled IDS to test, but I just downgraded to 16.16 last night.  I'll know when I get in the office if it fixed it or not. ... View more

Unless I’m mistaken, I don’t think that shows unless you have a Meraki Switch. At least it doesn’t show for me. You are talking about network wide->clients, right? ... View more

What licensing is required for this? ... View more

@PhilipDAth That's an interesting idea!  Never thought about making a JavaScript based syslog server.  That could be very helpful sometimes.  I'm just not sure if it could run in a browser - I would think browser security would prevent JavaScript from being able to "listen" on a port for inbound traffic. ... View more

I'm not bent out of shape about it.  ...It just seems like there should be a process here.  I understand the constraints, but to have ZERO mechanism for transfer seems odd.   If the firewall isn't connected to the internet in the org that has it claimed, couldn't a support case be opened with that org and inform them they will lose the device in 7 days unless they respond?  That seems rational.  Even Microsoft does that with a 365 tenant, and that seems higher stakes than a disconnected firewall.   ... View more

Yeah, I figured.  Thought it was worth a shot to see if there was some kind of better option. ... View more

I will PM you with my case # as well. ... View more

Of course not.  But they didn't make a source code change, they made a configuration change.     Any enterprise change control process would require documentation of changes made.     Clearly the change disables something, what is it? ... View more

The inverse was true for us.  Everything worked fine for a few days after the upgrade to 16.16, until suddenly it didn't...   ... View more

The resolution to this is very concerning.  The OP gave me his case #, and Meraki performed the "back end fix".     However, support will not tell me what this fix does.  Our cyber security policy and change management requires documentation on what is being done.  How can I allow a 3rd party to make changes that I can't qualify or document?     Support says:  It is against company policy to disclose backend changes.    How would you guys respond to that? ... View more

Hmm, maybe I was looking at the wrong thing?  How much is cheap?   ... View more

Now, if only you didn't have to buy a minimum of 25 licenses to actually USE AnyConnect! ... View more

Yes, same here.   ... View more

Ouch, this just bit me too.   ... View more