Meraki

BlakeRichardson · ‎Apr 8 2021

Given he's wanting a MS350 I am assuming he wants 10Gbe. If so then theres not much he can do about the noise. If he doesn't require that speed I would go with a smaller model as suggested.

PhilipDAth · ‎Apr 7 2021

I would raise a support ticket. I'm thinking support might be able to do this for you. Otherwise, the issue is you need to get a list of the serial numbers, and these don't appear on any of the shipping documentation. You would need to get a bar code scanner and manually scan the whole lot into notepad or something like that, and then bulk claim it.

MarcoBri · ‎Apr 7 2021

I'm testing on vMX/AWS and works great !

ZeeBoussaid · ‎Apr 6 2021

contacted Meraki and they were aware of it. it seems to be fixed now. it's just annoying when you try to reconfigure the Uplinks and realize you can't.. but it's fixed nevertheless and im connected to N297 btw.

Inderdeep · ‎Apr 3 2021

Full information of OSPF on MS switches https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Layer_3_Switching/MS_OSPF_Overview

ainfinity · ‎Apr 2 2021

Thanks. Yes. I plan to put Z1 in another dashboard network. This has been helpful.

StevenEarl · ‎Mar 26 2021

I opened a case with Meraki. What was happening was I was not getting the blue button that says FINISH EDITING. If I created a rule the button was not showing up. Working with TAC we found that if I went to the page and then refreshed the page the button showed up but for new sites with new rules I was having an issue. After trying Firefox I did not have the same issue. Chrome was not always giving me the button. could have been my security settings. So - be sure you get the FINISH EDITING button - and then click on save. I am going to try again with objects. Otherwise too many IP addresses to have to type in.

SandroZ · ‎Mar 26 2021

Correct answer: D As always thanks for your participation and for the cryptic spoiler free answers! Uplink port are marked with the white arrow. https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Monitoring_and_Reporting/Switch_Port_View

chyanchae · ‎Mar 25 2021

I'm running ISE 2.4 and I have a separate group of endpoints (about 20000 devices). I wanted to set the policy through the RADIUS Called-Station-ID value, but I could not specify the endpoint group and entered the MAC address value, so the policy setting for about 20000 devices is not efficient. Can you give an example of a ISE policy?

kYutobi · ‎Mar 24 2021

Good job everyone.

Antonio_Ruiz · ‎Mar 23 2021

Keep Organizing that wires!!! - That Shoots L00K's Gr3@T !!

PhilipDAth · ‎Mar 19 2021

No.

SandroZ · ‎Mar 19 2021

Correct answers: a, c Kudos for the spoiler free answers!

TBQ · ‎Mar 17 2021

Hello KarstenI, Thanks very much for your guiding, i will update the configure this weekend and keep you posted Cheers Tang

BlakeRichardson · ‎Mar 16 2021

Also get a second person to try and "break" or "Bypass" what you have done so that you get confirmation that what you want to achieve is actually happening. A second pair of eyes is always very useful with this kind of thing.

jmoake · ‎Mar 16 2021

you can use the AP to capture traffic on it's wired port to see if there are DHCP requests going out and responses to it's DHCP request. i tis under network wide /monitor / packet capture

KarstenI · ‎Mar 15 2021

Yes, the HQ-network is a smaller subnet and will take precedence over the default-route for SIG.

WTorres · ‎Mar 14 2021

Lets say that I put the printers on VLAN 20 and the Students on VLAN 10, if using IPSK How would my printer Group Policy look like? Layer 3 Firewall, Layer 7 FIrewall, etc

RumorConsumer · ‎Mar 14 2021

No DFS events in the logs. I was able to catch it in the act. The speakers went dead and looking at the log, the channel changed to get better reception less than 30 seconds before. The log shows the speakers dissociate while every other device doesnt even bat an eye. Some report dissociation and then less than 2 seconds later reassociate. I bought this: https://www.tp-link.com/us/home-networking/wifi-router/tl-wr902ac/ And set it up in client mode as a simple wireless bridge. The speakers have an RJ45 on them for hardwired connections. I factory reset the speakers and told them not to connect to my wireless network. They connected via this TP Link device smooth as butter and have been happily listening to music for days with not a single drop out with a few channel changes. To me, this pretty conclusively points the finger at the speaker's wireless implementation. That they hit an unrecoverable crashed state (they must be power cycled to come back online) is an indicator that the driver or whatever governs their operation is not familiar with the circumstance where a channel changes. Computers need to know what to expect or they dont work right. That all sound about right to you guys?

SandroZ · ‎Mar 12 2021

The correct answer is ‘c’ !

AndrewHaines76 · ‎Mar 10 2021

Thanks. Trying to get some real world feedback.

KarstenI · ‎Mar 10 2021

Want some more "dirty workaround" options? 😉 If you can make your client-traffic to come from the same IP (from a PAT-router, AP with Meraki-DHCP, Proxy or something like that) you could configure a 1:1 NAT for this IP.

KarstenI · ‎Mar 9 2021

Hi all, I am searching around and I don't find it ... I have WPA3 transition mode (WPA2/WPA3) on my SSID and I have three types of clients: Devices where I know they support WPA3 Devices where I know they don't support WPA3 Devices where I am not aware if they support it Well, I thought, "just go to the dashboard and look for it". But where do I see which mode the client used? Have a great day, Karsten

shngrhm27 · ‎Mar 8 2021

I added the comma after the port, then I had to split the network, and Put this to the wireless network, & it worked perfectly.

ZeeBoussaid · ‎Mar 8 2021

just an FYI, i installed a new MS225 and blocked its MAC from ISE to replicate that ISE not responding, i had one machine with the applied access polices applied connected to the switch, and once the machine could not authenticate with ISE, the laptop had access to the internet and that's what we wanted. the VLAN 500 is defined in ISE, and since the MS is blocked, the 500 Vlan policy no longer applies.

About KarstenI

KarstenI

Karsten Iwen

Community Record

Badges