You'd be better using something like TeamViewer to connect to a device left at home on the Sonos VLAN.  VPN users have to be on a separate L2 domain to the internal networks so I don't think VPN is an option.   Mind you, if your Sonos devices are more than a couple of years old you won't need to worry about updates soon... 😉 ... View more

The latest 15.23 is apparently the last of the releases to be tagged as early release beta.  Having said that we run our whole estate of MXs (~25) on 15.x and have done since at least 15.14 if not before.   We have found it entirely stable and needed it for some of the multiple link SD-WAN features. ... View more

Crossed over? ... View more

@Dilevone of the first things I learnt in networking is just because you have set something up to behave in a certain way, never assume that it is!  All too often I have found that a firewall allow all policy is still inspecting traffic and dropping some...  Of course this may not be the issue for you, but always worth verifying.  Also you are running a somewhat old version of the AP software, but I wouldn't upgrade until you have done the wired test. ... View more

In concentrator mode you only use the first WAN port, all traffic goes through this interface and back out of it.  So the MX sits as a spur off the LAN (but using it's WAN port) which for the 250 is the SFP+ socket. ... View more

We have an MX HA pair at each site and a stack of physical switches that they connect to.  We cable one MX to one switch and the other MX to one of the other switches.  Therefore if either MX fails you still have a connection to the switch stack.  Equally if the switch connected to the active MX fails, the other MX takes over and as it is linked to a remaining working switch, you still have a connection.  Worst case where you get a partial failure on a switch, as the MXs are connected to the dashboard via the WAN ports, you can force a failover. ... View more

@IotaNetworks I'm not sure how you'd set up an Auto VPN hub in pass-through mode.  It needs to be able to route for auto VPN to work.  We have the MX hubs in our main DC set up as concentrators and this works very well.  It also removes the restriction of two WANs as you can route as many as you like to the concentrator using L3 switches between the site edge and the MX.  I'd follow that route and use the information in the post from @BrechtSchamp to learn how to make the most of it. ... View more

Try connecting the users to the wired network in the same subnet and using the same DHCP server as the original wireless setup.  If that fixes it then it is definitely something in the wireless setup, if not it is the firewall.   What code 26.6.1 etc. are the APs running, was that changed around the time the issues started? ... View more

Couldn't you tell it to load balance and set it to a limit of 1Gb so it won't saturate the primary link? ... View more

We made the exact same transition for a number of sites a while back and took the option of putting a small MX at each site for the public internet.  You only need the basic license level and an MX64 will cope with a few hundred phone/tablet users.  Having an MX with the APs gives you some good guest metrics. ... View more

It might, it depends on the quality of link between them, distance etc. Auto VPN isn't magic, just a simple way to connect sites.  With voice jitter is all important so reducing hops and concentrating on link quality is very important. ... View more

If they are independent then I'd look at DNS for rerouting as I wouldn't have thought you'd be able to get the IPs moved. ... View more

We use SIP with two providers, with one we use edge devices that terminate the SIP trunks and the phones and PBX talk to that, with the other it terminates on the PBX but this actually means that once the call is set up the phones talk directly to the trunk.   Is the SIP gateway on the internet, if so and it terminates on the PBX I'd set it up for all sites to talk to it directly to minimise jitter when in a call, they'll talk to the PBX at the HQ for call setup (signalling) and then hand off.   Are you creating an SD-WAN to link the sites? ... View more

@Thygesen I have asked them to take a look, hopefully we'll get a reply soon. ... View more

I think you are confusing WAN and DIA (internet), WAN is generally used for connections between sites, either directly cabled or using provider technology like MPLS, VPLS or SD-WAN.   If I've understood correctly, then the router at site A must be a firewall of some sort.  You could use bridged mode and then if the MPLS devices are set up correctly, the sites will talk and you will have a degree of traffic visibility.  Otherwise put them in routed mode and configure the WAN ports with your settings and pick a subnet for the LAN at each site.  ... View more

If by WAN you mean internet connection then your settings look fine on site A for that purpose, for site B, as long as the MPLS device sends traffic to the other one at site A if it is unknown then that is okay as well.   If by WAN you mean the MPLS tails then where is the internet connection?   The MXs at each site will need to be in separate networks in the same organisation.  If you want the two LANs to talk to each other then create an auto VPN (SD-WAN) and the two LAN subnets will be able to see each other.  ... View more

At site A do you have both WANs plugged into the one device?  Do you have two WAN links for one MPLS or two internet connections and one MPLS WAN, or one MPLS with internet access from the core and a second internet connection locally?   Why are you hoping the MXs can do, besides NAT the LANs to the MPLS? ... View more

The only count I can find on the wireless health tab is below, but that is for the whole selected time period.  Is that what you are looking for?     ... View more

It is also somewhat broken for us, on one site with 28 APs, six Meraki switches and a Cisco IOS core.  9 of the APs some up with a grey box and the label 1 AP, the other APs mostly show up connected to the wrong switches...  In the Wireless/Access Points screen they all show up as being connected to why they actually are connected to, so something has gone awry in the dashboard logic! ... View more

Does the wireless performance of the same model of laptop work better with Windows 10, or are they too old to be able to upgrade? ... View more

We are running it on 4 sites so far, more migrating next week as so far, so good. ... View more

Indeed, you need to use either a server, Windows or Linux etc. include one, or another network device such as an MX.  The latter is the route we are planning to take and we have set up the relay settings to point to the MXs IP. ... View more

I know, I only chanced upon it when I accidentally enabled L3 routing on one of our ms225/210 stacks that we were setting up purely for L2 edge use!  Our testing so far has confirmed that the inter-vlan routing does work, though we haven't yet evaluated the inter-vlan routing performance. ... View more

@Priesty the ms210 can do inter-vlan routing, it just can't do that many, do dynamic routing or be a dhcp server.  Please see this article:   https://documentation.meraki.com/MS/Layer_3_Switching/MS_Layer_3_Switching_and_Routing ... View more