About cmr

cmr

@Brian_Scheele they are org wide, there is only Organization - Policy Objects. I think the use is more aimed at say access to central servers where multiple networks are traffic to servers x,y and z is allowed, with policy objects you can define the server group once and re-use. Are you managing multiple ASAs on different sites through one console?

cmr

@luanvh did you try with the power supply connected to the laptop?

cmr

@luanvh check the wireless chipsets in the Ubuntu laptops, if they are Intel WiF5 chipsets (826x, 926x) then see if they are okay when plugged into the power. If they are then check for power saving settings in the wireless drivers and disable Mu-MIMO /SIMD power saving first, then all power savings if that doesn't work. There seems to be an issue when those kick in that causes packet loss, performance drops and then effective disconnection.

cmr

@BHDJon the management IP on a Meraki switch is purely for that, think of it as an out of band management interface on more traditional switches. All VLANs that you want data traffic on can have SVIs to route between them and will act as normal.

cmr

A quick comparison on what might have been..

cmr

Looks a bit like an Anglepoise lamp, quite an interesting idea: https://meraki.cisco.com/product/security-cameras/indoor-security-cameras/mv2/

cmr

Includes a 1.2Gb Cat 18 LTE (4G) modem, still no 5G: https://meraki.cisco.com/product/cellular/integrated-antenna/mg41/ Also MG41E released, same but with external antennas: https://meraki.cisco.com/product/cellular/external-antenna/mg41e/

cmr

@AVIF as the MS-120s cannot stack, I'd connect each to the MX with two cables if traffic is mainly to the internet. If traffic is mainly internal then is connect the switches in a loop A-B, B-C and C-A. Spanning tree will block one connection, then connect one MS to the MX.

cmr

@BHDJon MS390 is a Cisco 9300 with a software layer on top, hence it behaves like other Cisco iOS switch stacks

cmr

@UCcert you can stop being quiet now 😉

cmr

I've been applying 28.1, but WiFi5 wave1 APs only update to 26.8.1 for that version, even thought both 28.1 and 27.7 include the security updates...

cmr

In addition to @Bruce's comment above, we actually run a setup like this where each site has 2 WAN connections from the MX pair, with either one or both as VPLS (L2 MPLS) circuits. At the main data centre the WANs are terminated on routed ports of a L3 switch stack and the MX250 pair are connected to them as single ended VPN concentrators, terminating all of the SD-WAN site-to-site connections. It's worked well for about 2 years now on 15.x firmware and although we got no-NAT enabled, we never used it as the user traffic all goes through the tunnels anyway, with only the MX to cloud traffic passing outside.

cmr

@ctx505 do you have an on-site CUCM server? We run exactly your setup (except the enterprise edge firewalls are a different brand) and Cisco SIP desk phones work just fine connected to an MX/Z3 in a user's home.

cmr

Wow that is fast, only 6 here, must try harder!

cmr

@demazter we have ~1000 cameras running over a mixture of Meraki and Cisco infrastructure with most being remotely live viewed over a multi-link Meraki SD-WAN. However we are using MileStone XProtect, but the concept should be similar. What type of cameras are they, IP or analogue? What quality settings do you have and how much bandwidth does each stream use? Does playback work okay? What are the traffic levels on the recording servers and encoders? Is anything else in that VLAN? - we keep IP camera to recorder and encoder to recorder in one dedicated VLAN at each site.

cmr

@RVilhelmsen it may well be related to your configuration, I have a site running 14.22 on MS210s without issue and two sites running 14.21 with 355s, 225s, a 220, 210s and four 120s. On the site with the 355s 12.28 had major issues, whereas 14.19-21 have all been good.

cmr

@RestaurantGuy as you go across the screen you have high usage first, then unique quantity and finally average usage per client. If I try to look at either weekly or last 30 days on that network the app just stops responding. If I go to the normal web dashboard weekly shows 33,348 clients and last 30 days stops looking at 50,100 clients but at least you can use the pages.

cmr

@RestaurantGuy the issues occur when there is a network with a large number of clients, as per the screenshot, how many clients do you have on a working network?

cmr

A well written question this week with answers that really make you think. Have to agree with @Bruce and @KarstenI here 🙂

cmr

@Inderdeep I've edited my comment to make it clearer, thanks for pointing out the error!

cmr

@Inderdeep all of antennas for the MR46E are actually marketed as indoor antennas, even though they are not internal to the AP. Though it may or may not be possible to use them outside under a canopy... 😉

cmr

@Aslam if they can share the invoice with Meraki then you might be in luck. If it's the same company then surely the new management can access the accounts?

cmr

@WarrenG no offence taken, I was merely explaining the confusion 🙂

cmr

@WarrenG what you are referring to is internet load balancing, not SD-WAN. SD-WAN always needs a service or device at each termination point (location), hence the initial confusion.

cmr

@UCcert does that network complete on the iPhone app?

cmr

Community Record

Badges