About LudwigD

LudwigD · ‎07-25-2019

Congratulations! At first I taught, where is this in Ghent? But then I read the text Nicely done ! LD

LudwigD · ‎07-10-2019

Congratulations to all of You, and Thanks for all the help. Very proud there is among them someone from my hometown Ghent ! LD

LudwigD · ‎06-15-2019

Many thanks! Stupid how I overlooked this.....

LudwigD · ‎06-15-2019

Dear, A long time ago I gave a Raspberry Pi a fixed IP adress. This Pi is gone , but now I want to reuse this fixed IP adress for a new one. But trying to do this, how can I set this IP adress free again? can't find this on the Dashboard... Of course I can use a new IP adress (the easiest way), but... I want to know how to remove a fixed IP adress when the associated client isn't accessible (the smart way). Thanks (again...) LD

LudwigD · ‎06-01-2019

@MerakiMe wrote: Could I move my MX64 3-Year AdvanceSecurityLicense to a Brand new #Unclaimed #MX68W ? ? If this would be possible, I would immediately like to do the same. For private use License system is a hard one. LD

LudwigD · ‎05-14-2019

Thanks again, was very helpful ! LD

LudwigD · ‎05-13-2019

Many thanks ! I'll give this a try. So, if I understand well, I do not need any extra NAT or Layer 3 rules. LudwigD

LudwigD · ‎05-13-2019

I have two ISP: WAN1 and WAN2 I would like to send all activity from my SONOS system through WAN2. So I configured: 192.168.128.87 is the fixed IP of the SONOS Bridge in my system. Looking at the "Live Usage" in the Meraki App I see that all usage is still through WAN1 In the documentation I read: Configure the preference similarly to the rule shown below. In this case, the Local IP range of 192.168.128.252/32 is the internal device referenced in a 1:1 NAT rule, and the Preferred uplink is the one using the public IP reference in the same rule. But here I cannot follow any more, as I am not an IT professional (Home use of Meraki System)... Do I still have to make a 1:1 NAT rule (or Layer 3 Firewall ?). Can You please give me an example..... Help very appreciated, and Many thanks in advance !!!! LD

LudwigD · ‎03-11-2019

Thursday 21st March Brew on Quay – . Roof top bar. Woow, here in Belgium 8 °Celsius and probably raining.... Succes ! LD

LudwigD · ‎10-14-2018

Following this post: The PoE version of the MS220 offers 802.3af. The MR53 needs 802.3at power. If you are powering the MR53 from the MS220 it will retard its performance to live within the power restriction. I looked at my own network: Both the MR30H and MR33 have the same PoE Adapter (Linksys) but: the MR30H has PoE 803.3at and a throughput of 46 Mbps. the MR33 has PoE 803.3af with only 12 Mbps throughput. Is there a way to "force" the MR33 to also choose 803.at (which would improve the speed). Distance tot the gateway (MR42) is for both almost the same. Thanks! LD

LudwigD · ‎06-13-2018

What I would like in the (near) future would be an "upgraded" version of the MX65 with a Firewall Throughput of 500 Mbps at least. This would be more comfortable for SOHO use, in which the MX84 is sometimes too much (money). Just a wish of me... Thanks, LD

LudwigD · ‎06-11-2018

I see the same behavior. My was told (helpdesk) to use the latest Firmware. No difference seen. LD

LudwigD · ‎06-02-2018

facing the same problem here. So also interested in a solution... Thanks, LD

LudwigD · ‎06-01-2018

Thanks both! I'll give it a try and congratulation Adam with his MOTM ! LD

LudwigD · ‎06-01-2018

At home in my network (MX65W) my wireless settings are: MR42E (gateway) + MR30H in Mesh configuration. This functions very well. The only thing is my Samsung TV (somewhere in the middle): sometimes it connects tot the MR42E, other times tot the MR30H. Signal quality is much better when connected with the MR42E. Is there a way to "force" the TV to connect with the MR42E (without creating an apart WiFi network) ? Thanks, LD

LudwigD · ‎05-12-2018

Very clear and fast! My preferente is the Landbot system. With the other more “trial and error” chosing the right question. LD

LudwigD · ‎05-12-2018

Thanks! LD

LudwigD · ‎05-11-2018

I 've created a Client VPN for connecting to my MX65W when I am out which works fine. But when I look in the dashboard under Security Appliance / VPN Status I get no information. in the Firewall outbound rules I've set UDP Port 9350 open in the VPN Subnet. In the App I get the information "This application is unable to connect to VPN registers using outbound UDP port 9350" Or doesn't Client VPN support VPN Registry ? As I am not an IT professional, any help is welcome. Many thanks, LD

LudwigD · ‎02-25-2018

Thanks! I noticed I had the same problem Port Trunking with my QNAP NAS. I had to select 802.3ad on the NAS to activate LACP No its works perfect! And no longer the fault message in the Meraki Dashboard. LD

LudwigD · ‎01-01-2018

Thanks, System Manager licenses RRP is around $40 USD per year But at that Price, I Will give it a try after my free 30 days trial. LD

LudwigD · ‎12-31-2017

Thanks! Maybe a. MR33 in 2018..... LD

LudwigD · ‎12-30-2017

As mentioned before, I'm also interested in using SM for private (family) use. So today I started my Free 30 days trial. My question is: are all the functions available for every system? My setup us: MX65W - MR30H and MS220-8 switch. Tried this, in a new profile: https://documentation.meraki.com/SM/Other_Topics/Using_Fast_Lane_with_Systems_Manager Click + Add Settings and select WiFi to create a wireless payload. But I do not have the Wifi symbol, only "Restrictions" and "More iOS" Second question, is the price of SM affordable for private use ? Many thanks, LD

LudwigD · ‎12-29-2017

@Uberseehandel wrote: SM is eminently affordable for home use, and is ideal for families with children. About GBP 56 for a three year license. Thanks for the hint! I'll give it a try Starting my free 30 days trial today. LD

LudwigD · ‎12-28-2017

Thanks for the answer! It's a pity it won't work. So no Fast Lane for me ..... LD

LudwigD · ‎12-27-2017

I Use a Meraki System at home (MX65W+MR30H+MS220-8). Very pleased with it! I do not have System Manager. Is there another way to activate Fast Lane, so that mij iOS devices have better service? Device type: Apple iPhone Capabilities: 802.11ac - 2.4 and 5 GHz, Fastlane capable « details Channel width: 80 MHz Maximum bitrate: 867 Mbps Spatial streams: 2 802.11r: Off Fastlane: Capable Cisco + Apple have developed Fast Lane for iOS devices to improve the real-time application experience on enterprise networks. Meraki MR Access Points, in combination with a wireless profile installed on the iOS device, will enable the Fast Lane technologies. Or is this only for enterprise networks ? Many thanks, LD

LudwigD

Community Record

Badges

Re: [CONTEST CLOSED]: Community Challenge: MV Motion Recap

Re: Revealing the Meraki Community All-Stars!

Re: Removing Fixed IP adress

Removing Fixed IP adress

Re: Advance Security License

Re: Flow Preferences

Re: Flow Preferences

Flow Preferences

Re: New Zealand: Meraki Users Group Meeting

Re: Wireless Throughput and speed test

Firewall Throughput

Re: Iphones and Androids Bluetooth not showing on BLE scanning/clients

Re: Client VPN from public hotspots - port issues

Re: Force Client to connect to specific AP

Force Client to connect to specific AP

Re: Meraki Sales Chat Bots

Re: Client VPN and VPN Registry

Client VPN and VPN Registry

Re: Port aggregation not working?

Re: SM and MX65X

Re: SM and MX65X

SM and MX65X

Re: Fast Lane

Re: Fast Lane

Fast Lane

Firewall Throughput

Re: Revealing the Meraki Community All-Stars!

Re: [CONTEST CLOSED]: Community Challenge: MV Motion Recap

Re: Flow Preferences

Re: New Zealand: Meraki Users Group Meeting