Hi,   I'm seeing what I think is a bug, but one of my colleagues thinks is correct so I'm curious what the wider community thinks please?   Given I have a MX device which has two connected WAN interfaces (1 and 2) and load balancing is disabled to prefer WAN 1 and I have a flow preference configured to prefer Internet traffic up WAN 2 When I look at the /organizations/:organizationId/appliance/uplink/statuses API endpoint Then I'm seeing WAN1 as 'active' but WAN2 as 'ready'   My customer thinks this is correct as load balancing is disabled, but my reading of this page:   https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Monitoring_and_Reporting/Appliance_Status/MX_Uplink_Settings     Active - WAN interface is healthy and is currently being used to send client traffic. Ready - WAN interface is not currently being used but is awaiting failover from the Primary uplink that is configured under Security & SD-WAN > Configure > SD-WAN & traffic shaping > Primary uplink. To configure an active-active load-balancing state, refer to our article on Load Balancing. I think WAN2 should be 'active' as the flow preference is making WAN2 be 'used to send client traffic'   What does everyone else think please?     ... View more

Sorry if there is a really obvious answer to this, but searching these forums and the Meraki documentation I've not been able to find it.   I have a MX68w with a separate cellular router sat on WAN2 which, from the LAN side of the MX I want to communicate with (go to the web interface, poll it via SNMP, that kind of thing). The cellular router has a static route set to direct my MX LAN range back to the MX WAN2 IP so the routing is good, the MX has a static IP set on the WAN2 interface to make sure the IP doesn't wander and break my static route, all good.   As far as I can see, the default firewall rules should work as I should be caught by the default any/any outbound rule. I can ping the WAN2 static IP from the LAN side fine, but not the cellular router IP. Cellular router is working fine, as I can add another device to the Cellular router LAN / MX WAN 2 network and communicate with the Cellular router no problems.   Looking in the route table, there is no route for the WAN2 interface range, so I suspect that's the problem, but the Meraki UI won't let me add a static route for that. If anyone has any clues they can give me I'd be hugely grateful please!   ... View more

I thought this might be a useful thread to start to see if anyone else is in the same boat as us.   We want to collect a lot of monitoring data from the Meraki dashboard API to feed into our network service assurance platform. To do this efficiently via an API, we would want to see as many of the status and monitor calls made bulk by getting the output by Org rather than by device or by network.   To help Meraki with the prioritisation of this, I've listed the calls below I bumped into this morning that I wished were bulk, and I'll add to the thread as I find others - are there other per-network/device calls that others wished were per org?     {{baseUrl}} /networks/:networkId/appliance/uplinks/usageHistory {{baseUrl}} /devices/:serial/appliance/performance {{baseUrl}} /devices/:serial/lossAndLatencyHistory (the API requires IP - not sure why that's need, just list all the existing tests by destination?) {{baseUrl}}/networks/:networkId/appliance/trafficShaping/uplinkBandwidth (we don't need to call this often, but it would be nice to only have to call it once).   Any others?   ... View more

Hi,   We're seeing some odd results when it comes to collecting data on how much data is being sent to and from Meraki VPN peers.   The call we're using is /organizations/:organizationId/appliance/vpn/stats   eg:            "merakiVpnPeers" : [             {                  "networkId" :  "XXXXXXXXX" ,                  "networkName" :  "YYYYYYYYY" ,                  "usageSummary" : {                      "receivedInKilobytes" :  "2324" ,                      "sentInKilobytes" :  "6140"   Where the tunnel latency summaries on the same call seem to get updated every minute or so, the traffic usage only seems to get updated every 20 minutes. Are others seeing the same? If so, we'd really want to see that stat be updated more frequently, as it's really important to help identify the cause of latency and poor performance.   When we graph the data expecting the stats to be updated as frequently as the latency stats, we get this result:     Best   Martin ... View more