Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Become a member of the Cisco Meraki Community today
Get answers from our community of experts in record time.
Join nowAbout CameronS
Community Record
31
Posts
46
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
Mar 19 2024
4:24 AM
I would check that the switchports the APs are connected to are in the right VLAN and that the specified VLAN is the same subnet which has your DHCP server. If DHCP is in another subnet, ensure you have a DHCP relay configured.
... View more
Oct 31 2023
5:25 AM
1 Kudo
This happened to me too, After an RMA it would still occur. It turned out that we had too many clients as per the recommended usage which caused high cpu usage and in turn a reboot. We had to upgrade to higher models in the end.
... View more
You could try using the AD auth but on the client device, set the network adapter settings for the VPN as below:
... View more
Jul 24 2023
3:39 AM
I couldn't test this at the time as the VPN connection went down (authenticates via AD which happens to be on VLAN 1).
... View more
Jul 24 2023
3:08 AM
Apologies. After the changes, no devices can communicate on VLAN 1 including the DHCP server which in turn causes issues with our other VLANs client addressing (due to bad DHCP settings). The scope uses .252 as the gateway which was the core switch but then changed to the MX.
... View more
Jul 24 2023
2:46 AM
We are running into issues with our VLAN configuration when making some changes. For reference: initial config: L3 MS225 core switch stack client VLAN 1 Interface IP set (subnet gateway x.x.x.252) Do not respond to DHCP MX105 HA static route route for VLAN 1 Route all to management interface of core switch stack Do not respond to DHCP 2 DHCP (HA) servers both using VLAN 1 addresses This works without issue but very messy IMO New config (replicating other client VLANs): Core switch stack client VLAN 1 interface IP set (x.x.x.1) Do not respond to DHCP MX105 HA Remove static route Add client VLAN 1 MX IP set to the gateway address x.x.x.252 Do not respond to DHCP No change to DHCP servers The changes are to change which L3 device becomes the gateway and allow for seamless routing within VLAN 1. For some reason the above changes just breaks the VLAN. All other client VLANs are setup this way but are relaying DHCP to the DHCP servers that sit in VLAN 1 (I know we should probably have interfaces for the other client VLANs too). The issue must lie with DHCP in my head but I cannot figure out what exactly so hoping some of you geniuses could help. TIA
... View more
Have you tried using the Active Directory authentication rather than RADIUS?
... View more
Are there any issues under your wireless health?
... View more
Apr 27 2023
1:27 AM
2 Kudos
My business has recently implemented an all digital solution for communicating delivery notes and invoices rather than using a paper-based system. We have also installed a number of electric charging points to promote the use of electric vehicles! We've only got one earth and every small contribution helps 😄
... View more
Mar 13 2023
6:22 AM
9 Kudos
A year later, a few upgrades have been made (MX75 > HA Pair of MX105s). The spaghetti monster is still in hiding!
... View more
Feb 20 2023
4:24 AM
Its a historic VLAN ID so hey ho! The AP was installed 8/22 so fairly stable in theory.
... View more
Feb 20 2023
3:44 AM
We have a Meraki MR36 that is showing as a connected client in our dhasboard. However, it is showing as being on an untagged VLAN (VLAN 0) under the client information. This AP is connected to a MS225-24P on a trunk with native VLAN 10 with client VLANs allowed. Is there a reason why it is showing on the client list at this VLAN?
... View more
Nov 3 2022
2:57 AM
4 Kudos
Hi Jared, Best practice would be to have the port as an 'access' port. Type: Access Access VLAN: 2 Voice VLAN: 4 Therefore, you can plug a device into the passthrough to get a VLAN 2 address, whilst the phone picks up the VLAN 4 address.
... View more
Apr 4 2022
7:21 AM
6 Kudos
A lovely clean-up of the spaghetti monster Before After
... View more
Mar 24 2022
2:13 AM
I am experiencing the same issue on an MX75, I suppose just wait until the next FW release.
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | 46642 | |
| 9 | 8810 | |
| 6 | 18292 | |
| 6 | 1852 | |
| 4 | 5551 |
© 2025 Cisco Systems, Inc.
