Sorry for the delay in reply, forgot to circle back on this one.  Trying not to disagree but this is not false advertising.  Meraki has always followed an MVP philosophy and the hardware typically has greater capabilities than what is supported in the firmware at FCS. Many times the additional hardware capacity is leveraged in time, but sometimes not.    The APs are capable of supporting 160MHz channels, it simply wasn't implemented due to lack of demand and it never became practical in typical enterprise deployments.  As you pointed out this thread is a couple years old and 160MHz channels (still) have not become a thing in 5GHz.  There has never been significant client support for this, and there are too many issues (DFS overlap, etc) that have prevented 160MHz channels from ever being useful or practical for real-world channel plans.    We do all love the idea of 160MHz channels, and with WiFi6E it'll be great in the 6GHz space, but 160MHz in the 5GHz spectrum IMHO was more of a headache than it was worth.  And with the limited client support there never was much demand for it and 80MHz channels was basically where the technology topped out (practical perspective, not theoretical of course).    I'm not on the development team but I can imagine there wasn't any reasonable ROI to develop, test and deploy 160MHz on that generation of APs and firmware.   ... View more

@Ishai there is no limit, (no maximum of two for example) and the limit will be how many hubs/concentrators you have defined, so if you actually had 5 data center hubs defined, then (if you wanted) each spoke could have 5 tunnels to all 5 hubs defined in any order you like, and of course you could stagger that hub priority order across many different spokes.  I'm not saying I would suggest that necessarily, as this can dramatically increase the tunnel counts, but it's certainly possible, and just keep an eye on the sizing guide.  The three key items for any given MX are throughput, number of clients and tunnel count.  ... View more

Sorry for that delay, I was away on PTO last week.  Will PM you now and get this taken care of. Regards, Dave   ... View more

@dkoziupa-sas they are not sold separately as replacements, might have to find one 3rd party.  If you only need one also check with your local Cisco/Meraki SE who can ask around if somebody has one.  I have one myself from an old Lab MV21 that sits on a rack and I don't need the mounting plate, so if you only need one, I can send you mine, just PM me.  ... View more

Hi @Flamengo if you ended up in that situation where the ship-to country and geo-IP mismatch, and in addition if Dashboard is not allowing you the option to update the regulatory domain as a result of that, I think you'll have to open a quick case with Meraki Support to correct this.   ... View more

Hi @MarcoKoch check with your local Meraki SE on this and have them sync with the Dashboard PM team.  There should be some good news on this front in the coming months.  ... View more

Hi @Edwin_Remudaro1 it might just be your organizationID?  To test, simply type out the entire GET URL, like this https://dashboard.meraki.com/api/v1/organizations/123456/networks and click Send and see if you get a 200 response or something else.   ... View more

Hi @Mike777 if you are asking to manage your Hikvision cameras with the Meraki Dashboard or ability to manage the Meraki MV cameras with Hikcentral, then no.  If you are referring to bringing the Meraki MV video stream(s) into Hikvision's management platform, then yes, via RTSP that @BlakeRichardson mentioned.  That would apply to any 3rd party system that can ingest the RTSP stream. Then you can leverage MV's RTSP streaming to integrate with those other systems and/or analytics you might already have in place, or it can be leveraged for an interim period of time during a migration.   Doc article is here for reference. https://documentation.meraki.com/MV/Advanced_Configuration/External_RTSP   ... View more

@cmr if it's an HA pair, I'd expect the roughly 20 minutes or so, as there's a 15-minute delay built in.  But I had not heard of MX upgrades recently being changed to operate on the hour.  Let me know which model of MX and if you're standalone or HA pair.  Will check into it.  ... View more

Hi @Basicme you should just be able to set up the speaker groups using the Amazon Alexa app, I have it running with no issues in my home.  Assuming you posted here because the devices are running on Meraki MR access point(s).  Take a look under Network-Wide > Clients and check their connectivity and addressing, etc. and see if they're on the same subnet/vlan for example.  Perhaps you have the SSID running in NAT mode which is typically the default, if so try running in Bridge Mode under Wireless > Configure > Access Control > Client IP assignment and see if that might help.  Let me know if I misunderstood the question.   ... View more

Correct that they might work fine but were not specifically designed for the vehicle use case (vibration hardened for example) but that said, MT10/12/20 are the first 3 products in a new product family, naturally more will come, we just don't know what we might be surprised with in 2021 😀  If you did leverage them for that use case, I would not expect any sudden failures, but perhaps premature failure due to the cumulative effects of the mobile, non-indoor environment.  ... View more

Hi @PhilipDAth, at the moment, both the sensor and the gateway do need to be in the same Dashboard network.  I will check the Feature Request log in case others are asking to have a separate "sensor network" construct in the Dashboard where the gateways might exist in their existing/previous networks, but I'm not sure if that's a major lift as far as feature requests go.     ... View more

Hi @Shadius when you drop down your network selector, simply choose "View all networks" and then select all 3 checkboxes for those networks and click the "Combine" button and give it a name, that's it!   To the original question, different admins have different reason on why they might want to logically separate their Meraki technologies into different networks even though they are in the same site.  Could have to do with how they leverage config templates to how they divide up their network admin rights, etc.  And in some cases, it's because they didn't realize they COULD simply combine them.  😀 ... View more

Hi @Cmadiam82  Should be simple to do this via Network-Wide > Configure > Group Policy and you can specify your firewall and traffic shaping and content filtering rules as well as specify a schedule for when the policy is enforced.  Hope that helps!  More info: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Creating_and_Applying_Group_Policies   ... View more

First I've heard of this issue, good idea checking here with the Community, and I'd also suggest getting a support case open in parallel if you have not already, since Meraki Support will be able to quickly cross reference with other customers having the same issue.  Sounds like you've already done the basic troubleshooting steps, including temporarily disabling IPS and AMP and have been checking the logs and running packet captures, and ruled out an ISP issue since it's consistent across multiple providers.  Sounds like the next step is letting Support also dig into why you're getting connection reset packets from the remote IP.  ... View more

Love it @KarstenI !  I didn't realize we've added Meraki USB fans to our swag lineup, nice!   @cyriel95 here's one of my replies to a similar, earlier post - and I now see there's a better/correct option, LOL:    I don't disagree, the fanless convection-cooled devices run pretty hot, and there's no "thermometer" reading in Dashboard.  However the products are designed to withstand that indefinitely, which is why they are covered by the lifetime product warranty.  Still, it can be unsettling, they can be very hot to the touch, and we all know electronics don't necessarily like very hot ambient (and internal) temperatures.  Like you, I've had stacks of MX64/65 appliances and MS220-8P switches running in my lab for years, stacked right on top of one another, in a poorly ventilated basement storage closet, no issues.    That said, I have had customers with the same concern, such as premature failure due to constant hot operation for multiple years.  So I suggested, since they have  MX appliances, to use the USB port on the MX to run a low-cost USB powered personal fan like this https://www.amazon.com/ARCTIC-Breeze-Mobile-Flexible-Portable/dp/B003XN24GY/      I got one myself to test and the temperature (between my MS220-8P and pair of MX65 appliances) dropped by an impressive 25 to 30 degrees F.  Is was relatively quiet as well.  There was no other ventilation in my closet, just this personal USB fan plugged into one of the MX65 USB ports and bent in a loop to direct air across the 3 pieces of equipment.  Just a thought, in case you have a similar case with hot equipment and poor ventilation.   Hope that helps!   ... View more

@RafaelM  Are Merakians allowed to participate?  What kind of swag is up for grabs? 😁 ... View more

@cmr is correct, the radiation pattern tends to be fairly spherical by design, so vertical wall mounting is very common and can be just as effective as horizontal mounting on a ceiling.  Theoretically I always argue that horizontal mounting is optimal with the indoor MR APs, but you can see not by much looking at the azimuth/elevation charts.  Hope that helps!  ... View more

@IMustafaSaleh @PhilipDAth documentation with some guidance on this is coming soon, and I'm not sure in what format or if there will be actual distances stated, since it's RF and every deployment is going to be different.  Short answer will always be "it depends".  So like with WiFi, perhaps the officially correct answer is to do a site survey.  The main takeaway is a general statement, it is Bluetooth communication, so expect the typical Bluetooth distances and propagation and attenuation characteristics.   Note, max EIRP is 10mW (10 dBm), and antennas are integrated and cannot be replaced/modified/extended. Also keep ion mind that the MV cameras are designed to be wireless clients, so you might expect slightly better range for your MT sensors with an MR access point versus and MV camera, which may or may not be noticeable, again every deployment will vary. ... View more