You may or ay not have an additional device(s) in your Dashboard led to being out of compliance even though the co-term is set for 336 days away.    A screenshot of your license page can help add more context. ... View more

@John-Yberllan    I work for Cisco Meraki, and licensing is still sometimes mysterious to me(jk). However, if you call the support line, you can speak to a license specialist who can assist in rectifying the situation.   Hope that helps. ... View more

Hello @Tarmahmood1,   The topology that you have laid out is feasible. The VLANs configured on the MX67 will not compete with the VLANs on the MX95.   The egress for the MX67 will be a VLN ON THE MX95.    I hope that this makes sense. Let me know if you have any questions. ... View more

Hello Everyone,   One thing I can say for rebooting C9300 series switches is to be mindful if the uplink is LACP or not. The reasons can vary for a switch not coming online after a reboot.    If you are able to take a packet capture on the upstream device of the switch, I would do so and look for traffic patterns. For example, are there any packet destined for the Dashboard, and do we have any return traffic from the cloud?   Also, proving the "show tech" can help as well, assuming you can get to the CLI. ... View more

@RyanDonaldson, @ammahend is on the money! Meraki's Google Speadsheets plug in is the way to go here! You can pull and filter the results in a spreadsheet.  Not only that, you will find more useful reports within the plug-in that will help in the future; I'm sure of it! ... View more

Hello @Stuka_Fluka, as stated by @alemabrahao, LACP is not supported on the WAN side of the MX. However, if you have dual WAN link, they can still be used as redundancy, even it's the same ISP.  ... View more

Hello @Parameswaran,   When you say "offline", are you referring to management traffic, data traffic, or both?    Are you experiencing any packet loss to adjacent devices on that same VLAN?    What other performance issues are seen during those "offline" periods?  ... View more

As a workaround, we can try using the private IP of the printer when configuring on the client device.   When searching through the Wireshark packet capture, we are looking for mDNS and if it's being broadcast on either VLAN.  ... View more

I agree with @alemabrahao. I would start with Wireshark packet capture to follow and investigate the traffic between VLANs.   Is VLAN 4 able to ping users in VLAN 5? What about vice versa? ... View more

Hello @Phi1001,   I've heard of customers leveraging free applications (like DataDog) to ping across the tunnel are certain intervals to keep the tunnel up.    If you are REALLY fancy, you could use a CRON job that sends out pings at or during times when traffic is minimal.  ... View more

Hello @Hari8370,   Do you have any server-side errors that correlate to the "failed" event seen on the switch port? Also, have you checked the event log on the Dashboard? There may be good information there.    ... View more

Thanks! I see now. Your case is a bit more complicated than "bad" configurations. Since the case has been escalated, the best path is to continue working closely with support. ... View more

Hello @BaskaranGanesan, Have you tried calling Cisco Meraki support and troubleshoot live with an engineer? They maybe able to catch something that we are overlooking.   If the timestamps of the roaming events matches up with the user experience during that time, I would record the following information: MAC address of the device APs involved (and the RF of the APs) The SSID  The radio (2.4 or 5GHz) The time   These details help a lot during troubleshooting.  ... View more

Hello @Dawson,   Please ensure that the remote ISP device is configured to forward 500/4500 downstream to the laptop.    You can also validate by running a Wireshark packet capture on the wireless interface of the laptop while attempting the client VPN connection. ... View more

Hello @pBrain,   When it comes to matter like that, I'd recommend speaking with an SE (if possible) who can take the requirements and design 1 or more solutions. They are usually privy to new (or soon-to-be) features that can be of use.    Here are some KBs that may help: https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Networks_and_Routing/Integrating_an_MPLS_Connection_on_the_MX_LAN https://documentation.meraki.com/MX/Deployment_Guides/MPLS_Failover_to_Meraki_Auto_VPN ... View more

Hello @Craieggg,   If you go to the Organization > Monitor > Firmware Upgrades and look at the release notes for 'IOS XE 17.15.1.9', there is a message addressing VLAN RSPAN/SPAN. ... View more

I agree with @cmr.   However, first and foremost, bring the C9300s online individually and allow them to connect to the M.Dashboard before building the stack. ... View more

I agree with @michalc. The description sounds a bit unusual. I would focus on the specs and the ability of the server's NIC. One can even take packet captures to validate how said traffic is being treated.  ... View more

Great question. ... View more

Hello @Holli69,   Has the switch stack been deleted in the Dashboard?    Consider unplugging the device, hitting the reset button 10-15 times (to kill any juice that may be remaining), powering on the devices, and trying another reset.    If the switches are in a stack, perform the reset on the "active" switch.    Also, if the switches are in a stack, consider deleting the stack momentarily (please mind any L3 SVI on the stack).    If you have DHCP available on any other the VLANs, see if the switches can come online using DHCP.    Lastly, consider taking a packet capture on the upstream device if possible. This will show us what traffic patterns (if any) are seen from the switches.   ... View more

@JFR  Hello,  I agree with @alemabrahao. You may want to speak to your Cisco Meraki rep to see how much "sanitized" information you can get on how Cisco Meraki devices validate and authenticate to the cloud for firmware management.    What @alemabrahao described can be considered as general process that is used.  ... View more

Hello @siya, I'm more than happy to help!    Are these errors consistent or sporadic?    Is there a specific parameter that you feel is responsible for the 500 error? Have you tried to POST a small to benign change, like increasing or decreasing the transmit power by 1?    I believe that I've found a workaround to this issue. Please try the following steps:   1. Enable band steering on all SSIDs with both 2.4 and 5GHz enabled 2. Run an API that has had constant failure to see if we get a 200 code  3. Disable band steering where is was enabled in step 1 4. Test again that same API   ... View more

Hello, This API call return resuls in kbps for a given time frame. You can request a time frame by adding '?t0=2025-04-29T11:54:11.289392Z&t1=2025-04-30T12:09:11.289316Z' at the end of the URI. What do you mean by 'dataVolume'? I'm afraid that I don't see that parameter by that title. Please let me know if this answered your questions. ... View more

@Hannah-C wrote:   New articles:   Using Tags to Manage MR Access Points Change: Added "Adding or removing a tag from an AP that is broadcasting SSIDs configured to use 802.1X with my RADIUS causes the SSIDs to restart on that AP and clients will be disconnected. Non-802.1X SSIDs remain unaffected."  A change that increases reliability and accessibility on wireless networks is always welcomed! ... View more

Yea... there are some... growing pains 😬 ... View more