Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
- About nst1
About nst1
nst1
Building a reputation
Member since Sep 18, 2018
3 weeks ago
Community Record
104
Posts
3
Kudos
0
Solutions
Badges
3 weeks ago
Hola, Estoy configurando un SSID con MAC Filtering, de la siguiente manera. Configure unnSSID con un PSK. Configure reglas de Firewall & traffic shaping de la siguiente manera. Configure un Group policies y la estoy aplicando a una MAC address que di de alta. Todo aquellos equipos que la MAC address este dada de alta se conectan obtiene una IP y tienen slaida a internet. Pero tengo una MAC address que no esta dada de alta mucho menos estoy aplicando el group policy y este equipo logra conectarse y obtener una IP, no tiene navegación mucho menos internet. Pero quiero evitar que no obtenga una IP y que no se conecte para nada. Hay alguna manera de lograr esto ???
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Wireless LAN MR
3 weeks ago
I am configuring an SSID with MAC Filtering, in the following way. Configure an SSID with a PSK. Configure Firewall rules & traffic shaping as follows. Set up a Group policies and I am applying it to a MAC address that I registere. All those devices whose MAC address is registered are connected, obtain an IP and have access to the Internet. But I have a MAC address that is not registered, much less I am applying the group policy and this device manages to connect and obtain an IP, it does not have navigation, much less internet. But I want to prevent it from not getting an IP and not connecting at all. Is there any way to achieve this???
... View more
3 weeks ago
Hi I configured an SSID with MAC filtering as described here and indeed this works. But what I have noticed is that if I have a device that its MAC address is not registered in the dashbord By just having the password, this device connects and obtains an IP but it has no access to the Internet because the MAC is not registered. This device will have access to the Internet until the MAC address is registered in the Dashbord. I have made several L3 rules conventions but I have tried to ensure that my computers do not have IP. Is there a way to avoid what I'm talking about. ??? Note: The addressing is being given by Meraki.
... View more
Mar 29 2024
9:58 AM
I had to open a case with Meraki TAC. The only thing they told me was that it was a known issue. But they still didn't know which version it would be resolved in. So they made an adjustment in the backend but they never told me what it was. Since that moment the problem has not occurred again.
... View more
Yes, it was only once, so far it has not happened again.
... View more
They are only logs in the MX, in the MS I don't see anything at all, these logs are no more than 1 minute.
... View more
I have the following connection but today I noticed the following log. I even lost service for approximately 1 minute or less. peer_type gateway, peer: 10.52.20.2 connection_status: connected peer_type gateway, peer: 10.52.20.2 connection_status: disconnected These logs are only seen in the MX, in the MS I don't see anything Check the configuration of both ports on both the MX and the MS and they are identical.
... View more
Apr 4 2023
12:51 PM
Currently I implement a meraki LAN network (1 switch core 425 and 14 switch ccess 225). My network works without problem, but I have a question; How do I know when I have broadcast problems on my network? any Is there a configuration that avoids broadcast problems?
... View more
Mar 3 2023
8:42 AM
I tried sending an email to MyNumberPhon@txt.att.net, but the email tells me that the message could not be delivered.
... View more
Mar 2 2023
5:02 PM
Hello, I am interested in receiving alerts via SMS I found this URL: https://documentation.meraki.com/General_Administration/Cross-Platform_Content/Alerts_and_Notifications#Receiving_Email_Alerts_via_SMS Here it says that this is the AT&T syntax: phonenumber@txt.att.net I have added my number with the format to receive alerts but it has not been successful, Do I need something else????
... View more
Feb 16 2023
11:46 AM
1 Kudo
This post was very helpful. https://community.meraki.com/t5/Wireless-LAN/hostname-not-showing-in-Ekahau-results/m-p/184895#M24929
... View more
Nov 24 2022
10:28 AM
Currently the firewall is L3 and DHCP we want to take that job away from the firewall
... View more
Nov 24 2022
8:42 AM
That's a good idea, but we want the MS425 to manage L3 and not the Fortigate.
... View more
Nov 23 2022
7:35 PM
We will have an infrastructure renovation. And the equipment that we will use will be MS 425-16 (core) and MS225-48 (access) Scenario 1 The MS 425-16 (core) will be connected to the Firewall (Fortinet) In total, 7 Firewall cables will be connected to the MS. Namely: 1 cable will be for the (VLAN & SVI) of wifi guest. 1 cable will be for the LAN (VLAN & SVI) 1 cable will be for the (VLAN & SVI) of admin switches. ....and so on And also the MS 425 want it to be the DHCP And it is intended to reach the following, as shown in the following image I do not agree, because meraki does not allow me to assign an IP to a specific port. The ports can only be access or trunk but not L3. Scenario 2 I have commented having only 1 cable from the MS to the Fortinet and creating a transport VLAN between these two devices and creating the different VLANs in the MS. When creating it I will already have a default route from MS425 to the fortinet and in this way it will allow me to create my VLANs and also run the DHCP the scenario is possible ??? is the scenario correct ???
... View more
Labels:
- Labels:
-
Interfaces
-
Layer 2
-
Layer 3
Nov 9 2022
7:48 PM
Currently I have two MS (in stack) and an MX I want to connect a second cable from the second MS is this possible?? because I already tried it and the network becomes unstable, that is, I start losing packets.
... View more
Aug 26 2022
8:17 PM
Hi, I have a question about best pratices, Currently in my network there are switch MS 225 and MR 44, i´m interesting to apply best practice in the ports where are connected only my access point. Are there a best practices for this porpouse ???
... View more
Jun 1 2022
4:32 PM
I have the same problem, do you have any idea what could be happening???
... View more
Apr 14 2020
12:37 PM
I am apply best practice in all my netwok. I am follow the recomendation of best practice for LAN of Meraki, then i saw the part of QoS in the switches. I check my firewall and have the configuration of Security SD-WAN > CONFIGURE > Security SD-WAN and Traffic shaping rules Enable default traffic shaping rules. That´s why my question if is necessary the configuration QoS in the switches or only with configuration of the MX configuration is it enough.
... View more
Apr 14 2020
11:39 AM
ok, then your recommendation is enable QoS in my switches and my MX ? or is sufficiently only in my switch ?
... View more
Apr 14 2020
11:32 AM
Then, the QoS in the Switch is for the user than have connect ? for example.
... View more
Apr 14 2020
10:28 AM
I want apply best practice to my network. In this case i want QoS, but i have a doubt, why in my dashboard i have in the route Switch > CONFIGURE > Switch Setting and Quality of service And In the route Security SD-WAN > CONFIGURE > Security SD-WAN and Traffic shaping rules What is thedifferencebetween each menu ????
... View more
My Top Kudoed Posts
| Subject | Kudos | Views |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3795 | |
| 1 | 33252 |
© 2024 Cisco Systems, Inc.
