Just under £450+VAT in the UK ... View more

An MR53 should function with any active PoE switch, ideally use a PoE+ switch.  If you are intending on having one Meraki AP and one other vendor's AP active at the same time on the same SSID, then try to minimize overlap and as @PhilipDAth said, whitelist the other AP on the dashboard. ... View more

As far as I'm aware, with Meraki:   Beta = new major release Release candidate = new minor release   Once more than ~10-15% use it, it becomes release. ... View more

On the WAN port you can select no Nat (it is a checkbox towards the bottom) and tag as VLAN5 ... View more

What firmware were you running, I have an MR55 on one network and it seems fine, was it roaming issues, speed issues or disconnects etc.? ... View more

@NolanHerringI think there must be something else involved as the particular AP I tested today was upgraded a month ago and has been up continuously serving 5-20 clients at any one time since...  Currently it has two on 2.4GHz and fourteen on 5GHz. ... View more

@pjcI finally managed to test one of our MR32s on 26.6.1 and I don't get the timeout issues that @randhall was seeing. ... View more

@randhallI have finally tested one of our MR32s on 26.6.1 and I get no packet loss so there must be something else that is different between our networks that causes the issue you see.  Our MR32s are plugged into Cisco 3850 switches and us them as the default gateway. ... View more

It is under the Network-wide/Clients menu and shows for clients that can be controlled; wireless if you have MRs and wired if you have MXs on the same network.     ... View more

The utility of the virtual IP is limited in SD-WAN, but it reduces the downtime to near zero when doing a firmware upgrade as well, which as we have been using the 15.x train that is currently on its 26th iteration for our 24/7 operation, I'd personally never go non HA with virtual IP! ... View more

The socket on the PSU needs a high temperature power cord and connector as mentioned above (C15).  Here is a good layman's guide: http://www.blogquail.com/the-difference-between-iec-connectors/   Any long enough manufactured cable with a C15 on one end and whatever power socket you have C14, C16 or country specific connector should be okay. ... View more

Concentrator mode doesn't do NAT and a few other things so load on device is lighter than routed mode.  Depending on bandwidth and activity of devices the extra load might be fine for an MX250 as it is pretty powerful.  Look at the data sheets to compare throughput data.  Also best in mind that having the remote sites as spokes is the lowest load. Translating subnets will add load, can the remote sites not use different subnets? Using virtual IP makes failover smoother as the virtual IP is used for traffic and is held by whichever MX is currently master.  If you use uplink IP then failover can often be disruptive with ongoing conversations and tunnels needing to reconnect etc. ... View more

One of our venues has 5 floors and they are all on the same network.  In UK buildings the vertical signal is often better than the horizontal (thick walls, feeble floors) and we would need at least double the APs if we segregated by floor.   Is there a reason you want the devices to use an AP on their floor, device count etc.? ... View more

They are both the average percentage lost over the sample time.  For the 2 hour graph there is a shorter sample time so as packet loss is usually intermittent tiny periods of loss, you end up with longer sample times showing less average loss.   i.e. 100% loss for 1 second If the 2 hour graph has a 2s sample time it will show 50% loss If the 1 day graph has a 10s sample time it will show 10% loss ... View more

Our dashboards are still showing the alert 4 hours later, not sure what the progress is? ... View more

Our dashboards have been showing the below for four hours now:     Perhaps the IPv6 rollout is having a wobble...? ... View more

We have about 60x MR42s running 26.6.1 and haven't seen any particular issues. ... View more

@NolanHerring In this post   https://community.meraki.com/t5/Wireless-LAN/Is-MR-26-6-1-stable-release-safe-to-upgrade/m-p/75110#M11413   It was being discussed that that MR32 particularly had issues with 26.6.1. ... View more

We had a somewhat similar setup and the way we did it was:   All SSIDs have a VLAN tagged on them, all are in bridged mode Switchport config like your example VLANs that want to simply go out to the internet, no VLAN interface on switches. Firewall(MX/ASA) on internet connection connected to a port with those VLANs on it Firewall runs DHCP for those VLANs VLAN(s) that you want to go to DC get their DHCP from a local L3 device, either the WAN router, or in our case the L3 core switches at the site. Port where WAN router is connected does not have local VLANs 52,53 on it, just 5 ... View more

Running it on a WLAN with 1xMR32 and 2xMR34, when connected to the MR32 I am NOT seeing the packet loss/timeout issues that some others complained about with 26.6.1.   I haven't yet had the chance to test our MR32s on 26.6.1. ... View more

On our shard 184 and 199 dashboards the following warning, oddly in green, rather than orange/red has just started being displayed:   The Meraki dashboard is currently undergoing critical maintenance. During this period, Meraki devices that are currently online can still be configured from the dashboard. Making account changes, attempting to create new networks or organizations, and adding new devices to your existing networks will not be possible until this maintenance is complete. We will provide the next update in an hour. ... View more

@MarshMadnessif you have the enterprise subscription on your MX then you may well want to leave another more fully featured device on the WAN side of it, however it is fairly unlikely that the AT&T device is such a thing, if you let us know the model I'm sure someone here will know.  If you have the advanced license then you definitely don't need the provider's equipment unless it is a media convertor (DSL to eithernet etc.) or the contract stipulates that you must use their edge device.   You can tell what MX license level your organisation has by going to Organization / License info as below, as you can see we only use Enterprise as we don't use our MXs as corporate edge firewalls:     ... View more

Yes that is the idea ... View more

I'm pretty sure that you cannot advertise non Meraki VPN networks to Meraki VPN peers using the same MX. You need two and to use static routes. If you simply mean LANs on the MX, as long as their DG is the MX then they should find the non Meraki VPN subnets. ... View more

And we're they recently upgraded from a different one?   We have ~20 MR32s on 26.6.1 and one has now stopped working with availability looking like the below:   We are bringing it back to the office to see what the matter is with it. ... View more