One other way you could perhaps tackle this is to combine ISE's bulk import with Meraki's API.   The API call you could use is this one: List the status of every Meraki device in the organization   HTTP REQUEST GET /organizations/[organizationId]/deviceStatuses PARAMETERS None SAMPLE REQUEST curl -L -H 'X-Cisco-Meraki-API-Key: <key>' -X GET -H 'Content-Type: application/json' 'https://api.meraki.com/api/v0/organizations/[organizationId]/deviceStatuses' SAMPLE RESPONSE Successful HTTP Status: 200 [ { "name":"My AP", "serial":"Q2XX-XXXX-XXXX", "mac":"00:11:22:33:44:55:66", "status":"online", "lanIp:"1.2.3.4", "publicIp":"4.3.2.1", "networkId":"N_1234" } ]   ... View more

I have a new avatar! ... View more

Thank you for the quick reply, believe there is a site survey but it's probably 2 years old and there's been multiple changes to the Network in general since then. ... View more

Thank you @MeredithW for the wonderful note.😊 ... View more

for me is a problem that it can be configured only on the template configuration rather than on the network instance attached to it. I would have local guest ambassador for each site and I don't want guest ambassadors from every site to be informed about guest users created from other sites. ... View more

Congratulation Winners !!! ... View more

Thanks Philip.   That's a great suggestion. I will go through that link. ... View more

Very cool Swag! Thanks Meraki! ... View more

Actually, logout seems to be working now. Let me know if you're still seeing it not work! ... View more

If you are using voice/video sensitive applications over the wireless, then I would disable as it will most likely cause your fast-roaming to not be so fast, dropping voice calls etc.   To be honest Nolan this isn't a major issue for us. All that might go over WiFi is the occasional Teams/Skype call. Not much more than that.   I would basically just check the power levels, that is usually the reason if an AP is blasting and the others are not. You can change the Indoor Profile for the power level range, in case its still set to default values of 5-30dBm. You might want to close that up to like 11-14dBm for example, or whatever your initial survey results intended for.   TBH I can't remember what the initial survey suggested for power levels, I'll tinker and see what works. ... View more

No, not just a test device is happening to every device ... View more

Thanks for the link. This looks more like something geared towards more control on per client limiting and that can be done but that'd be hard to enforce considering clients on this network won't all be equal in usage and the only thing that matters is the pipe data limit itself. Probably can be done with RADIUS though, thank you. ... View more

That's a bug.   When you use Meraki as L3 switch you usually get a random client in the network that get's allotted most traffic coming from the L3 switch. From logical deduction (I don't have the facts like the Meraki team does) I believe the problem is as follows: - The switches/AP can only track clients using MAC - The MX can do both but is configured to use MAC because they're all in the same combined network. - But the L3 switch of course uses it's own MAC to forward frames towards the MX if you use a best practice point-to-point /30 LAN between MX and MS and all LAN traffic gets routed out that /30 towards the MX. - I also believe the traffic recognition differs on the switches than the MX'es so that means if the MX and the MS agree that this traffic is skype.. then the registration of that traffic to the dashboard will be coming from the MS with the correct client MAC address.   However if they don't agree for example the MS says it's HTTPS traffic, but the MX classifies the traffic as bittorent then you will have duplicate registration of the same traffic and of course the MX will see the traffic coming from the MAC of the MS causing one client to have major traffic towards WAN/Internet.  How it chooses the client name though is a mystery for me. I hope a Meraki technician could provide more inside clarification on this. ... View more

Our LogRhythm appliance is physical so all logs get sent to that 🙂  ... View more

@NolanHerring wrote: I'm tempted to try this in my freeze now lol I have an MV72 on the soffit of my garage that I put up a month or two ago. Next winter when we're at -40C here in the Great White North I'll let you know how it's doing 😉   The logs are weird for this too... I get lots of heater off messages, but no on.Might be time to open a case.   ... View more

Hi there,   The Cisco Meraki Solutions Specialist certification is intended to be launched as a Cisco Technical Specialist certification akin to other specialist certifications like the Cisco Telepresence Solutions Specialist. More information on Cisco’s Technical Specialist certifications can be found here: https://www.cisco.com/c/en_ca/training-events/career-certifications/specialist.html.   Our intention is to have this certification integrate with the Cisco Certification Tracking System at launch and be trackable just like any other Cisco specialist or career certifications. Be on the lookout on the Community for more information in the coming months as these processes get finalized. ... View more

I just spent a bit of time testing this (see my thread) and found that if both MX's are connected to a L2 switch, then when you direct connect them as well, there is a loop and the client connected to the switch is no longer able to access anything.   If you only have 2 MX's and are directly connecting your client into them, then you will need to direct connect them for VRRP to work. Otherwise you end up with 2 Masters which is apparently not good. ... View more

@Richard_W wrote: I found a gnome is that an egg? Gnomes are not eggs 🙂 ... View more

Haha nice find!   Thank you, Peter jJame ... View more

Neither do I. Either read the manual, Ask for help or turn the job down it as simple as that.  ... View more

On hindsight, I probably should've changed it from wired.meraki.com ... View more

Just a follow up on this as I got two MX67C recently so I am testing this out.   First time powering this MX67C on I already installed the AT&T NANO-SIM card WAN 1 connection active   After a few minutes, it downloaded firmware and rebooted. The Cellular interface did not show anything until after the reboot. Then I saw it (live) populate information.   Screenshots below   Status only says 'READY'   When I click on the edit icon, it has 'disabled' already highlighted. Not sure if that means anything.   I manually selected Enabled and now the status shows 'READY, ENABLED'   So I'm pretty sure that we don't need to do anything (like clicking enabled). I'm going to test this on the second one and see if when I unplug WAN 1, the cellular kicks in automatically (without me doing anything GUI wise).   ... View more