We have a small branch office. At this point our  MS320-48LP doesn't have any VLANs on it.  There is a single lan: 192.168.1.0/24. default gateway 192.168.1.1 (the ip address of our cisco). We are givng access to a small group for a couple of weeks. We'd like to retain our existing LAN but give them a different LAN to use.  So I'd like to add this subnet 192.168.10.0/24 and to keep it separate I'd like to tag it VLAN 10.  We will provide them with access to a wireless SSID which will have its traffic tagged vlan 10 and a couple of physical ports on one of our switches.  How do I add this config?  I've added the VLANs in this configuration (see image). I have been tinkering... I Understand that the interface ip has to be different to our default gateway hence me choosing something completely different: 192.168.1.254. This has created a static route to 192.168.1.1 VLAN 10 says it is already routed.  Have I set this up correctly is there anything else from a switch perspective I need to do? At this point I am not getting internet on vlan 10.  Clients connected to the switch or the new SSID ARE picking up the correct IP settings (192.168.10.0/24 ip and gateway of 192.168.10.1). Supplemental question.  I have another Switch to which we have a couple of APs. The new SSID should be available on these. I've stacked the switches, will this be enough to route VLAN 10 if clients associate with the APs on that switch?   ... View more

The switch we use for our SAN has failed. It was an old Dell switch but we weren't too worried about it because we are moving more and more traffic into the Cloud. We're not using the fibre channels on the SAN - just the RJ45 ports - it's just 3 node setup running on 10gig ports. It works fine, or rather it did.  Today I need to replace that switch.  We have a sticking plaster solution but I am not happy and I'd like to think a bit more long term. I've had a look at a couple of conversations on here about using a Meraki switch to run a san. The consensus is... don't??? Why? There seems to be some discussion that the Meraki switches don't handle jumbo frames. Surely a modern switch should be able to handle the traffic? And as we already have Meraki switches it makes sense to keep using the interface we like.  Am I missing something?  Anyway, hoping for a decent discussion on the pros and cons.  We are a small setup. As time moves on I expect we will move even more stuff into the cloud and leave the switches just handling a small lab setup and lan traffic. ... View more

Does anyone know if it's possible to push SOPHOS endpoint to MacOs?   I've read some older threads which suggested that it wasn't possible. However we've moved to the new SOPHOS Central. Unlike Windows machines we don't have any tools to push the AV to macs which means we need to put it on the Macs by hand - which is painful.   I've found this article which suggests some command lines. https://community.sophos.com/kb/en-us/120570   Has anyone tried? My colleague is having a go but he's stuck with the "invalid app for Mac" error even though it's a DMG installed. ... View more

Hi,   We have 5 Access points. Some of wireless users are complaining that they are experiencing poor performance at their end of the office.   There's nothing obviously wrong and there's been no changes to AP location, underlying infrastructure etc.   I HAVE read this: https://documentation.meraki.com/MR/Other_Topics/Client_Balancing   We notice that of our access points the distribution is something like this: 1. 45 2. 15 3. 10 4. 15 5. 14 The access points are roughly equidistant.... What I don't understand is, what is causing all of these wifi clients to cluster round AP 1? ... View more